Pulosi Is Turning a Blind Eye to Radical Islam in Her Own House! Dangerous!

by Ilanit Chernick

{ jpost.com } ~ Popular American Imam Omar Suleiman, known for his Israel-bashing antics, gave the Ramadan invocation at the opening of Thursday’s House of Representatives session… Suleiman is the founder and president of the Irving, Texas-based Yaqeen Institute for Islamic Research. He was invited to give Thursday’s invocation by US Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson (D-Texas), a Yaqeen Institute statement said. The information was originally revealed and reported by the Investigative Project on Terrorism.“We pray for peace, not war,” he said. “Love not hate. Benevolence, not greed. Unity, not division. And we commit ourselves to not betraying our prayers with actions that contradict them. Let us be for truth, no matter who, or for is against it.” Suleiman has made several vehemently anti-Israel comments and also seemed to side with Hamas in an August 2014 Facebook post. As the 2014 Gaza War broke out, Suleiman said on social media: “How befitting that the 3rd Intifada starts on the 27th night of Ramadan as worshippers are denied prayer in Masjid Al Aqsa.” He ended his post with a prayer of sorts: “God willing on this blessed night as the 3rd Intifada begins, the beginning of the end of Zionism is here. May Allah help us overcome this monster, protect the innocent of the world, and accept the murdered as martyrs. ameen.” During the war, Suleiman also denied that Hamas uses human shields in an attempt to stop the IDF from retaliating against rocket fire sent from Gaza into Israeli civilian communities. “If Hamas was using human shields, wouldn’t the Palestinians say something about it?” he wrote. “Surprise, surprise: apparently the IDF was guilty even as they tried to convince the world that the reason why they couldn’t stop massacring civilians was because of the use of human shields. This is disgusting… #FreePalestine #ICC4Israel” Also in 2014, Suleiman also made a comment on social media alluding to the antisemitic idea that Israel controls American foreign policy, claiming that it is the “51st state… Dems will burn for letting this happen. https://www.jpost.com/Diaspora/Israel-bashing-Imam-delivers-opening-prayer-at-House-of-Representatives-589337


Trump Is Correct! hanoi-Kerry Violated Logan Act-More Than Once

by Jeff Dunetz

{ lidblog.com } ~ President Trump on Thursday correctly accused former Secretary of State hanoi-John Kerry of breaking the law by meeting with Iranian officials last year… Trump told reporters : “You know hanoi-John Kerry speaks to them a lot, and hanoi-John Kerry tells them not to call. That’s a violation of the Logan Act, and frankly he should be prosecuted on that, But my people don’t want to do anything, only the Democrats do that kind of stuff. If it were the opposite way, they’d prosecute him under the Logan Act,” But it will never happen because violating the Logan Act is a Democratic Party tradition. During interviews to promote his new book this past September hanoi-Kerry told an interviewer that he has met with Iranian Foreign Minister Javad Zarif three or four times since leaving office and that their talks touched on the international nuclear agreement which hanoi-Kerry negotiated and President Trump withdrew from because it was such a bad deal or America. This was the first time hanoi-Kerry admitted this violation, but in May of this year, the Boston Globe reported that he had been secretly meeting with the Iranian foreign minister and European leaders, advising them on how to save the flawed JCPOA. The President is saying that hanoi-Kerry’s meetings were a violation of the Logan Act. And the stepfather of the Heinz Ketchup fortune has violated the Logan Act before. In 1985, Senator hanoi-John Kerry traveled to Nicaragua for a friendly get-together with the Sandinista president, Daniel Ortega. The position of the Reagan administration was to support the opposition Contras. hanoi-Kerry wasn’t much interested in the administration’s position. Upon his return to the United States, hanoi-Kerry met with President Reagan to convey a message from Ortega. Reagan “wasn’t thrilled,” hanoi-Kerry later told the New York Times. In 2006 hanoi-Kerry went to Syria to meet with Assad over the objections of President Bush #43, who was trying to isolate the Syrian despot at the time… https://lidblog.com/kerry-logan-act/


New York Times May Have Broken Law by Publishing Trump’s Tax Returns

by Hans von Spakovsky

{ dailysignal.com } ~ The New York Times no doubt considers it quite a coup to have obtained and published President Donald Trump’s tax return information from 1985 to 1994… But doing so violated Trump’s right under federal law to the confidentiality of his tax returns. The Times—which reported that Trump’s businesses lost $1.17 billion during the 10-year period—has no more right to Trump’s tax returns than it has to mine or those of any of you reading these words. Confidentiality, as the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals held in 1991 in U.S. v. Richey, is essential to “maintaining a workable tax system.” Taxpayer privacy is “fundamental to a tax system that relies on self-reporting” since it protects “sensitive or otherwise personal information,” said then-Judge (now Supreme Court Justice) Ruth Bader Ginsburg in 1986 in another case when she served on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia. Federal law—26 U.S.C. §7213(a)(1)—makes it a felony for any federal employee to disclose tax returns or “return information.” Infractions are punishable by up to five years in prison and a fine as high as $250,000 under the Alternative Fines Act (18 U.S.C. §3571). Regardless of the accuracy or inaccuracy of The New York Times story, tax returns themselves, as well as tax return information such as these IRS transcripts which are a summary of the tax returns, are protected from disclosure by federal law. And this provision applies to private individuals as well as government employees, a fact that should be considered by the New York Times’ source. According to the newspaper, it did not actually obtain Trump’s tax returns but “printouts from his official Internal Revenue Service tax transcripts, with the figures from his federal tax form, the 1040, from someone who had legal access to them.” The Times quotes a lawyer for the president, Charles J. Harder, as saying that the tax information in the story is “demonstrably false” and that IRS transcripts, particularly from the days before electronic filing, are “notoriously inaccurate.” However, that claim is disputed by a former IRS employee now at the liberal Urban-Brookings Tax Policy Center… https://www.dailysignal.com/2019/05/10/new-york-times-may-have-broken-law-by-publishing-trumps-tax-returns/?utm_source=TDS_Email&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=MorningBell&mkt_tok=eyJpIjoiWlRrd01XVmpNbVk0WXpCaiIsInQiOiJ0NjVQSHhIUFNreUhCV3Vhck9GUW05bTd5b1VNMnN4ZGV6TisyaGRRN2NCXC9ZeHVhY21hUERiTHBQN0tZNTNaUTFheUlqenNsUDRqYWRGbU4zOXBcL1dOZHVtZlNlUzF4eTBacGxvcmtyeDlheEJLS3R2Qk15K2t3VXVBN1dncFYyIn0%3D


scumbag-Schiff threatens they might slap Trump, admin officials with hefty fines if they don’t comply with subpoenas

by Tom Tillison

{ bizpacreview.com } ~ With Barack scumbag/liar-nObama having set the tone, weaponizing the institution of government to target political opponents may be here to stay… Not willing to accept special counsel dirty cop-Robert Mueller finding no evidence of collusion with Russia, Democrats push forward with their efforts to undercover enough dirt to impeach President Donald Trump — or at least damage him enough to ensure defeat in 2020. And they’re intent on doing all they can to intimidate Trump and his administration into complying with a number of investigations of the president — there are no less than FIVE Democrat-controlled House committees now targeting Trump. The latest Democrat to flex his political muscles is Rep. scumbag-Adam Schiff, D-Calif., the notorious Trump-hating chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, who made it clear Thursday he may fine Trump officials who refuse to comply with subpoenas, to include the president himself. Speaking with Axios’ Mike Allen at a Friday morning newsmaker event, scumbag-Schiff said the Pulosi-led House is considering reviving its inherent contempt power to impose hefty fines on Trump and administration officials to force them to obey subpoenas, according to ABC News…  https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/05/10/schiff-threatens-they-might-slap-trump-admin-officials-with-hefty-fines-if-they-dont-comply-with-subpoenas-753397?utm_source=Newsletter&utm_medium=BPR%20Email&utm_campaign=DMS

VIDEO: https://rumble.com/v7lyjz-schiff-you-could-fine-someone-25000-a-day-until-they-comply.html


Denver voters reject ‘Right to Survive’ homeless camping initiative

by Kurt Sevits

{ thedenverchannel.com } ~ Voters in Denver appear to have overwhelmingly rejected a measure that would have overturned the city’s ban on camping in public places… As of preliminary results released at 1 a.m. Wednesday, Initiative 300 was headed for defeat with 83 percent of voters saying “no” and 17 percent saying “yes.” Results won’t be certified until later this month. Denver’s current urban camping ordinance bans tarps, sleeping bags and tents in public. That ban was put in place in 2012. Proponents of Initiative 300 said the ban is cruel and unusual and their measure is necessary to protect human rights. The campaign to defeat Initiative 300 raised millions of dollars, and many local organizations, including the Denver Rescue Mission and other homeless advocacy groups, all voiced opposition to the measure. The all state needs to build homeless shelters for them. The same way the government builds for illegals.  https://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/local-news/denver-voters-reject-right-to-survive-homeless-camping-initiative


Dems Claim ‘Constitutional Crisis’ Over Faux Scandal

Thomas Gallatin: “Not one of the six Democrats granted access to what amounts to 99.9 percent of volume II of the dirty cop-Mueller report, which details the president’s behavior as it relates to obstruction of justice, have taken the opportunity to examine it,” writes National Review’s Jack Crowe. But according to House Judiciary Committee Chairman scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler (D-NY), there’s a “constitutional crisis” after President Donald Trump, at the request of the Justice Department, asserted executive privilege to protect Attorney General William Barr from being held in contempt of Congress. Undeterred, Democrats maintained their vacuous assertion that Barr is hiding something and voted to hold him in contempt anyway.

Spare us the hand-wringing over constitutional fidelity and the Rule of Law. This is nothing more than pure Democrat political theater meant to advance their manufactured faux scandal. scumbag liar-Nadler peddles a myth when claiming that Barr is “not being truthful with Congress.” How has Barr not been truthful? In fact, the AG went above and beyond the requirements of law in order to get as much of dirty cop-Robert Mueller’s report to the American public as is legally possible. Anyone can get a copy, and key Democrats even have access to all but a few lines of redacted material.

But that’s not enough for Democrats. Their demand is that Barr break the law by presenting the report fully unredacted. As Hans von Spakovsky of The Heritage Foundation explains, “Unless Congress’s request for Rule 6(e) grand jury material falls squarely into one of the statutory or court-created exceptions, the attorney general — any attorney general — is prohibited from disclosing that material to Congress. And the congressional request doesn’t fit any of the exceptions.”

Why are Democrats making this demand, since dirty cop-Mueller’s team, which consisted of mostly Democrat lawyers, determined after nearly two years of investigation that no crime was committed? Because, as Mark Alexander notes, “It’s not about the substance of the dirty cop-Mueller report. It’s about keeping the fake narrative alive.” Democrats will not be satisfied with anything short of removing Trump. So, if there is a “constitutional crisis,” it’s not coming from Trump and the executive branch.

scumbag liar-Nadler’s claim that the executive branch has somehow overstepped the Constitution’s delineation of powers is a charge that is nonsense on its face. Using the term “co-equal,” scumbag liar-Nadler and the Democrats act like that means the executive branch is fully answerable to the legislative branch’s every petty demand. Clearly, Democrats believe their political position and interests are “more equal” than Trump’s.

Recall that it was the same scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler who back in 2012 touted that he “just joined the #walkout of the House chamber to protest the shameful, politically-motivated GOP vote holding AG scumbag-[Eric] Holder in contempt.” When it was a Democrat sitting at 1600 Pennsylvania Ave, scumbag liar-Nadler was singing a completely different tune. But it’s 2019 and Trump is president…

The truth is, Democrats know that there is no “smoking gun” to be found in any of the redacted portions of the dirty cop-Mueller report. They just want an excuse to claim that Barr is engaged in “obstruction.” And they’re trying to tar Barr as a biased Trump stooge who is so politically compromised that he cannot be trusted as the nation’s number-one lawman. The real play? Self-protection. As Victor Davis Hanson observes, “Progressives are terrified that a number of Trump’s critics — scumbag/commie-Brennan, scumbag-Clapper, scumbag-Comey, McCabe — may soon be indicted. They apparently seek to preempt such indictments by attacking Barr, a seemingly no-nonsense prosecutor who will likely follow up on any criminal referrals from any inspector general that reach his desk.” Those coup co-conspirators pose the real constitutional crisis. ~The Patriot Post



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *