Judge Jeanine not buying loose lips liar-Joe Biden’s innocent plea, calls for the unsealing of Univ of Delaware records

by Tom Tillison{bizpacreview.com } ~ Responding to 2020 presumptive Democratic nominee loose lips liar-Joe Biden insisting sexual assault allegations by former Senate staffer Tara Reade “never happened,”… Fox News host Jeanine Pirro is calling for the unsealing of documents from loose lips liar-Biden’s time in the Senate. “I’m very disturbed by the fact that apparently his operatives went in there and went through boxes and boxes of files,” Pirro said in an appearance on Fox & Friends. “Why is this important? It’s important because she says that she made a complaint to three people in the Senate in 1993 regarding this sexual assault.” loose lips liar-Biden appeared Friday morning on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe” and was adamant that the claim by Reade is not true, but was equally adamant about not releasing records held by the University of Delaware to see if there is a copy of a complaint Reade has said she filed. loose lips liar-Biden called on the National Archives to search for the alleged complaint, but the agency refuted his claim that it would have the document. The candidate also added a caveat to the Democrat stance espoused during the Brett Kavanaugh confirmation hearings that all women are to be believed. Stressing Reade had “a right to come forward” and make her claim, and that it should be investigated, loose lips liar-Biden then declared “if she makes the case, or the case is made, then it should be believed.” “Here is the bottom line,” Pirro said. “loose lips liar-Biden can say it’s not true until the cows come home. But there is corroboration in this case.” The former judge said Reade told her mother, brother, and a neighbor about loose lips liar-Biden sexually assaulting her, which “is strong evidence in a sex crime’s prosecution trial.” “She told her mother, her brother, her friend, her neighbor and now we’re finding out about more people that she told about this and contemporaneous with the act,” Pirro said. “That’s important and as a judge I would tell this to a jury, it lends credibility to her complaint and it is admissible evidence.” As for the loose lips liar-Biden Senate records being held by the University of Delaware, Pirro noted that the documents should be unsealed because the alleged act is a class B felony. “Why is this important? It’s important because she says that she made a complaint to three people in the Senate in 1993 regarding the sexual assault,” she said. “Let me be clear, folks, this is not sexual harassment, this is not inappropriate jokes, this is real sexual assault that is a B felony in some states,” Pirro added. “So, we need to know whether or not that complaint was reduced to writing, and I can’t imagine it isn’t.” While noting that there may be statute of limitations issues, Pirro insisted “we’ve got sufficient evidence to, at least in this case, go to a grand jury.”…  https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/05/01/judge-jeanine-not-buying-joe-bidens-innocent-plea-calls-for-the-unsealing-of-univ-of-delaware-records-915675?utm_campaign=bizpac&utm_content=Newsletter&utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_source=Get+Response&utm_term=EMAIl

VIDEO:  https://rumble.com/v9ajsf-pirro-biden-allegations-are-real-deal-calls-for-u-of-del-records-to-be-unse.html

loose lips liar-Biden Left Dumbfounded for 15 Disastrously Awkward Seconds, Unable To Answer Tara Reade Question

By Johnathan Jones {westernjournal.com } ~ Former Vice President loose lips liar-Joe Biden joined MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski on Friday morning to discuss the elephant in the room, his sexual assault allegation… and came out on the other side with egg on his face. From his home in Delaware, loose lips liar-Biden finally addressed allegations from former Senate staffer Tara Reade, who claims he sexually assaulted her in 1993. loose lips liar-Biden denied the allegation while appearing on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe,” and in the process appeared marooned deep inside an island in his own head. Brzezinski generally avoided the softball type of interview many were expecting and actually grilled loose lips liar-Biden about being transparent about the allegation, and asked him if he is willing to release his records from his time as a senator from Delaware to the public in order to clear his name. Those records are currently held by the University of Delaware and contain more than 1,800 boxes of photos, videos, documents and other files, along with a vast collection of digital files, according to Delaware’s The News Journal. Some have speculated those files might contain information about Reade and a complaint she says she filed against loose lips liar-Biden. An exchange between loose lips liar-Biden and  Brzezinski about the records should be the end of his campaign. “Are you certain there was noting about Tara Reade in those records?” Brzezinski pressed loose lips liar-Biden in a portion of the interview. “Why not approve a search of her name in those records?” she asked after loose lips liar-Biden brushed the question off, noting that the records were supposed to be released several years ago but were ordered to remain sealed when loose lips liar-Biden announced he was running for president. “There is nothing,” loose lips liar-Biden said, adding that the records would not contain personnel files and also contained excerpts of private conversations with heads of state. Brzezinski then simply asked loose lips liar-Biden if he would permit a search of only Reade’s name in the records, and loose lips liar-Biden’s response was astounding. Brzezinski was met with dead air. The presumptive Democratic nominee initially responded with silence while appearing completely befuddled. Conservative commentator Benny Johnson shared video of the exchange…  https://www.westernjournal.com/biden-left-dumbfounded-15-disastrously-awkward-seconds-unable-answer-tara-reade-question/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=CTBreaking&utm_campaign=breaking&utm_content=conservative-tribune  

VIDEO:  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seu_C08yAAM&feature=emb_title

Top Trump policy adviser Joe Grogan to leave post

By MORGAN CHALFANT{thehill.com } ~ Joe Grogan, head of the White House Domestic Policy Council, intends to leave his position at the end of May… A White House official confirmed Grogan’s planned departure, which was first reported by The Wall Street Journal. Grogan told the Journal that he was leaving the White House on good terms with President Trump and that he planned to leave the position on May 24, having stayed in the role longer than he anticipated. Grogan’s departure had been rumored as a possibility for weeks, particularly following the arrival of Mark Meadows, a former North Carolina congressman, as Trump’s fourth chief of staff. “I had a great conversation with the president and a great conversation with Meadows,” Grogan told the Journal in an interview published Wednesday evening. Grogan has served as the director of the White House Domestic Policy Council since February 2019, overseeing a broad array of policy issues including health care and regulation. Before that, he worked as a top health care official in the Office of Management and Budget beginning in 2017 and was a close ally of Mick Mulvaney, Trump’s third chief of staff, whom Meadows replaced in March. Grogan worked as a lobbyist for drug company Gilead Sciences before joining the Trump administration. Grogan’s departure marks the latest staffing change at the White House amid the coronavirus pandemic. Trump replaced press secretary Stephanie Grisham with Kayleigh McEnany, a top campaign spokeswoman, earlier this month as part of a broader makeover of the communications team executed by Meadows. Grogan was one of the original members of the White House coronavirus task force launched in late January. It was not immediately clear who would replace him as head of the Domestic Policy Council.   https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/495385-top-trump-policy-adviser-joe-grogan-to-leave-post    

Pardon General Flynn

by JEFFREY LORD{spectator.org } ~ The headline in the Hill read this way: FBI official discussed trying to get Flynn to lie in interview, ‘get him fired,’ notes show… The story, as reported by John Bowden, says this: A handwritten note penned by an FBI official involved in the investigation into alleged ties between President Trump‘s campaign and Russia discussed the possibility of getting former national security adviser Michael Flynn fired, or forcing him to lie during his interrogation. The newly unsealed note details the strategy against Flynn in his meetings during the early days of the investigation with agents whom he has accused of tricking him into lying about his foreign dealings.“What’s our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie, so we can prosecute him or get him fired?” reads the note, written by the FBI’s then-director of counterintelligence. “If we get him to admit to breaking the Logan Act, give facts to DOJ & have them decide. Or, if he initially lies, then we present him redacted & he admits it, document for DOJ, & let them decide how to address it.”Got that? Right there, literally in black and white, is hardcore proof that the Trump-hating elites of the Federal Bureau of Investigation — an organization that was run by Trump-haters Director scumbag-James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe — was plotting and planning to set up a 33-year veteran of the U.S. military with a fake “crime.” Say again, the notes say that the FBI was asking:=, What’s our goal? Truth/Admission or to get him to lie … ? This is known as a perjury trap. An unbelievable abuse of power. It’s crooked as all get out. And two things should happen immediately.  First, President Trump should pardon Gen. Flynn ASAP. Here is Sen. Rand Paul on the subject: This is egregious and unacceptable behavior. I believe @realDonaldTrump should pardon Gen. Flynn. FBI official discussed trying to get Flynn to lie in interview, “get him fired,” notes show. Fox News legal analyst Gregg Jarrett said the same thing this way: Michael Flynn is the victim of one of the worst miscarriages of justice in modern times — an innocent man who was unfairly targeted by the FBI, wrongfully prosecuted by special counsel Robert Mueller, and coerced into a guilty plea under threat… https://spectator.org/pardon-general-flynn/?utm_source=American%20Spectator%20Emails&utm_campaign=3111061c5e-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_05_01_02_14&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-3111061c5e-104608113  

The Public Option Trojan Horse

by ROGER STARK{spectator.org } ~ The COVID-19 crisis has given the government an enormous role in the U.S. health-care delivery system. In a national emergency, this makes sense, particularly in a few specific areas such as New York City… One fact must not be forgotten: Americans have benefited from our privatized system much more than people in countries with top-down government-controlled health care have from theirs. Activists on the political left continue to push the U.S. health-care delivery system toward a single-payer, government-controlled plan. The debate now revolves around either imposing a complete nationalized program or an incremental approach toward fully socialized medicine. Activists are pushing a public option merely as an extension of scumbag/liar-nObamacare; they claim it is not meant to represent a complete government takeover of the U.S. health-care system. Washington state passed the nation’s first public option bill in 2019. So far, only Colorado has followed suit, although several states, as well as federal officials, are also considering a similar program. So what exactly is a public option? In the broadest sense, a public option is any government health insurance plan that public officials use to compete against private plans. More specifically, the current terminology refers to a government plan that is available in the scumbag/liar-nObamacare health insurance exchanges. Conceptually, a public option is a tax-funded, single-payer plan that competes against private insurance. It may or may not be administered by private insurance companies. The Washington state public option begins in 2021 and will compete against private health insurance plans sold in the individual market. These government plans will look very attractive at first because they will lower deductibles, offer more services before deductibles kick in, cap out-of-pocket health-care expenses at 10 percent of income, maximize subsidies, and limit premium increases. Taxpayer subsidies will be given to anyone who earns up to 500 percent of the federal poverty level — which in 2020 is $131,000 for a family of four. The state insurance commissioner will decide what treatments and procedures are included in the public option and whether or not doctors are providing “quality care.” There is no funding mechanism for the Washington state plan. Because the program does not begin until 2021, state officials are hoping that a left-leaning federal administration will be elected in 2020. This would potentially put the cost burden on federal taxpayers, and Washington taxpayers would not see the huge increase in state taxes necessary to pay for the public option. With the hit state revenues are likely to take by COVID-19, Washington’s funding issue has become even more problematic. There is no estimate of how many Washingtonians would sign up for the public option plan. The Hoover Institution, however, recently projected estimates for a national program. Those numbers are revealing. They strongly suggest that a public option is simply a huge first step to a single-payer system…  https://spectator.org/the-public-option-trojan-horse/?utm_source=American%20Spectator%20Emails&utm_campaign=3111061c5e-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2020_05_01_02_14&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_797a38d487-3111061c5e-104608113

My Candid Thoughts on loose lips liar-Joe Biden and Tara Reade

by Erick-Woods Erickson{ewerickson.substack.com } ~ If Tara Reade were a Ph.D. professor or lawyer instead of a former Hill staffer, Democrats would treat her much more credibly… The woke intersectional crowd is so militant on the issue of diversity because they recognize their own sins — white liberal elite are far more likely to believe other white liberal elite than anyone else. Reade is not in that camp but Christine Blasey Ford was. They won’t believe anything bad about their own side, but will gravitate to any claim about the other side. If Black Lives Matters leveled accusations against Labor Unions or abortion clinics, the white liberal elite would ignore them. But because their complaints are against those perceived as being on the right, they are championed. Just ignore the Planned Parenthood body count in the black community. I will keep nothing from you. I will tell you what I think. I did not believe Christine Blasey Ford and I do not believe Tara Reade. I do not believe either because I think there is no way to prove their allegations and they waited until an opportunistic moment to come forward to complain. We should not incentivize that opportunism, particularly when so far removed from a statute of limitations or evidence. The difference is that I am holding Ford and Reade to the same standard and Ford’s advocates are scrambling to change their standards. The reality is that Ford had no evidence and Reade may if her complaint exists. But I will not hold my breath on that complaint. By now, if a complaint existed, it will have “walked away.” Another fundamental difference is that Tara Reade actually told people at the time and Ford did not. Remember, the FBI did spend a few days interviewing people who Ford offered up and none had a recollection. Here, several people have come forward to corroborate Tara Reade’s allegations. Interns recall Reade abruptly being removed from overseeing them, as Reade claimed. Her brother recalls her talking about it. A neighbor does. Others Reade was close to at the time recall it as well. Then there is her mother calling in to Larry King Live, a fact almost everyone on the left refuses to even make eye contact with. That’s all pretty damning stuff. Nothing like that existed with Ford. Something did happen to Tara Reade that made her uncomfortable. But it was a long time ago even if not as long ago as Ford’s claims existed. Again though, the many Democrats and members of the press willing to believe Ford’s forty-year-old claims without corroboration or evidence sure are quick to dismiss Reade’s more recent claims that do have corroboration…  https://ewerickson.substack.com/p/my-candid-thoughts-on-joe-biden-and?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjo2NDc5NDkyLCJwb3N0X2lkIjo0MjE5NTMsIl8iOiJ3aGVpZyIsImlhdCI6MTU4ODM1NTE0MCwiZXhwIjoxNTg4MzU4NzQwLCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMjc4NDMiLCJzdWIiOiJwb3N0LXJlYWN0aW9uIn0.iPwfq1-9m_2lg9IR66eDlRLCwURvaI1mBWTw39KVupk 

loose lips liar-Biden Finally Challenged on Assault Allegations

Nate Jackson  

“It is not true,” declared Joe Biden during an interview with MSNBC’s Mika Brzezinski this morning. “I’m saying unequivocally, it never, never happened.” That followed a written statement likewise asserting, “This never happened.” It’s the first time Biden has acknowledged allegations that he sexually assaulted Tara Reade in 1993 or that he’s faced direct media questions about a claim that publicly surfaced over a month ago.

“While the details of these allegations of sexual harassment and sexual assault are complicated, two things are not complicated,” Biden said in his written statement. “One is that women deserve to be treated with dignity and respect, and when they step forward they should be heard, not silenced. The second is that their stories should be subject to appropriate inquiry and scrutiny.”In light of that, Brzezinski directly challenged loose lips liar-Biden to explain his comments during the Brett Kavanaugh character-assassination attempt. Back in 2018, loose lips liar-Biden said, “For a woman to come forward in the glaring lights of focus, nationally, you’ve got to start off with the presumption that at least the essence of what she’s talking about is real, whether or not she forgets facts, whether or not it’s been made worse or better over time.”loose lips liar-Biden responded to being reminded of his own comments with deflection: “Believing women means taking the woman’s claim seriously, and then vet it, and look into it, and that’s true in this case as well.”Brzezinski wouldn’t let go of the glaring Democrat hypocrisy, however, repeatedly asking loose lips liar-Biden to explain why his 2018 standard didn’t apply now. “Are women to be believed unless it pertains to you?” she asked. “Why is it different now? Do you regret what you said during the Kavanaugh hearings?”loose lips liar-Biden dishonestly replied, “What I said during the Kavanaugh hearings was that [Christine Blasey Ford] had a right to be heard. And the fact that she came forward, the presumption would be she’s telling the truth unless it’s proved she wasn’t telling the truth.”That is absolutely not what loose lips liar-Biden or any other Democrat said in 2018. Kavanaugh was guilty until proven innocent, which of course they would never allow him to be. loose lips liar-Biden’s standard now is that Reade shouldn’t be given the time of day.loose lips liar-Biden even attacked the media in his written statement for using, well, the 2018 loose lips liar-Biden standard for Reade’s allegations. It’s a pity Brzezinski didn’t ask him about that.He made a show of transparency by calling for a search of the national archives for any reference of any complaint by Reade, though he insists he doesn’t remember “any type of complaint she may have made.” However, while he declared he’s “an open book,” he refuses to allow access or any search of his Senate records held by the University of Delaware. In any case, Reade still has far more substantiation for her story than any of Kavanaugh’s accusers did for their vague, uncorroborated, and outlandish charges.Frankly, loose lips liar-Biden handled himself in the face of withering questioning about as well as anyone could expect from someone whose mental acuity has been in doubt. He categorically denied the charges and confidently asserted no one would be able to find any proof. Reade has not proven her case, and loose lips liar-Biden should be legally presumed innocent — just as Kavanaugh should have been. It’s almost like due process is important.All other considerations aside, this leaves one particularly glaring question, not just for loose lips liar-Biden but for the Leftmedia: Why did it take so long for him to say anything?Perhaps Democrats really are “reaping the whirlwind” Kavanaugh warned about two years ago.  ~The Patriot Post



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *