Trump: liar-Pelosi ‘broke the law’ by ripping up State of the Union speech

by Madison Dibble{ } ~ President Trump claimed it was illegal for liar-Nancy Pelosi to destroy her copy of the State of the Union speech on Tuesday night… liar-Pelosi, 79, sparked controversy when she ripped a copy of Trump’s speech right behind his back. Many Republicans criticized her for tearing the speech. Trump took it an extra step and said liar-Pelosi’s actions were illegal. “I thought it was a terrible thing when she ripped up the speech,” Trump, 73, told reporters on Friday. “First of all, it’s an official document. You’re not allowed. It’s illegal what she did. She broke the law, but I haven’t been asked a question other than a lot of people that viewed it, they couldn’t believe that she did it. I thought it was terrible, I thought it was very disrespectful to the chamber, to the country.” Trump added: “I got very high marks on the speech. I didn’t know she did it until I was walking out, and some of the congressmen and women were saying, ‘Can you believe what she did?’ But I didn’t know she did it.” A number of Trump’s Republican allies in Congress have pledged to take action against liar-Pelosi after she ripped up her paper copy of the speech. The Democrat-led House voted down a Republican resolution condemning liar-Pelosi for the stunt. Talking to reporters in front of the White House on Friday, Trump called Democrats “crazy,” adding, “There’s a lot of evil on that side.” He said he believed the administration has gotten a lot done, despite pushback from Democrats. When asked if he plans to work with Democrats following impeachment, he responded, “I do work with Democrats.” “I work with everybody, but that group is, you know, they say Trump derangement syndrome. They’ve got it,” Trump said. “They’ve got a bad case of it. You saw that. That was on display the other night when she ripped up the speech.”    

The New Way Forward “End America” Bill: The Worst Legislation You Never Heard Of

by Selwyn Duke{ } ~ What would you say about legislation requiring the government to use tax money to transport convicted criminal illegal aliens who’d already been deported back to the United States… calling it the “right to come home”? What if that bill also created a situation in which a known Mexican drug cartel leader could be released from prison, enter the United States “illegally,” and it would no longer be a crime? Such radical and self-destructive legislation has already been proposed. It’s called the New Way Forward Act (H.R. 5383), and it goes way beyond scukbag/liar-Hillary Clinton’s 2013 call for a “hemispheric common market” with “open borders,” according to commentator Tucker Carlson. In fact, it would be the coup de grâce to our already balkanized country, reflecting a radical new Democratic Party that views our nation as “a rogue state, in which everything must be destroyed and remade: our laws, our institutions, our freedoms, our history and our values,” as Carlson put it on last night’s edition of his Fox News show. This is no exaggeration. Introduced by Democratic Representatives Jesús “Chuy” Garcia (Ill.), Pramila Jayapal (Wa.), Karen Bass (Calif.), and Ayanna Pressley (Mass.) in December 2019, the New Way Forward Act (NWFA), shockingly, is supported by almost one-fifth of House Democrats, including Representatives worthless-Ilhan Omar (Minn.) and commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (N.Y.).Just as shockingly, this nation-rending bill has received virtually no media attention, tragic as it “would entirely remake our immigration system, with the explicit purpose of ensuring that criminals are able to move here, and settle here permanently, with impunity,” Carlson also relates. The commentator calls the NWFA “the most radical single piece of legislation we’ve ever seen,” making the Green New Deal, and proposals to end fracking via executive order and nationalize healthcare seem sane by comparison. The bill’s promotional materials actually state, “Convictions … should not lead to deportation” Carlson reports. Targeted are serious convictions, too — felonies bringing years in prison. Currently, “legal U.S. immigrants can be deported if they commit an ‘aggravated felony’ or a ‘crime of moral turpitude’ — that is, a vile, depraved act, like molesting a child,” explained Carlson. Yet under the NWFA, “‘crimes of moral turpitude’ are eliminated entirely as a justification for deportation. And the category of ‘aggravated felony’ gets circumscribed too”…  


Rush Returns: Limbaugh Back On-Air After Cancer Diagnosis

By Erin Coates { } ~ Conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh has returned to his radio program days after he announced his cancer diagnosis and received the Presidential Medal of Freedom this week… “Despite living in the public eye, I really am a private person. It’s just who I am,” Limbaugh said Friday morning. “Nevertheless, it has been one of the greatest blessings.” He went on to talk about when New York Yankees legend Lou Gehrig announced he had amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and said, “Today, I consider myself the luckiest man on earth.” Limbaugh explained that he had first thought that was just something famous people had to say in response to getting that kind of diagnosis. “Now I know there was nothing forced or phony or public relations-related about it. Because I feel the same way. I cannot thank all of the people that I have heard from since Monday,” he said. “The sentiments, the thoughts they are expressing are just incredibly nice and supportive. And to have this kind of support and to know it, to be fully aware of it, yeah, it does make me one of the luckiest people alive.” The 69-year-old host announced at the end of his program Monday that he had been diagnosed with advanced-stage lung cancer. He underwent treatment this week, according to The Hill. “So, I have to tell you something today that I wish I didn’t have to tell you. It’s a struggle for me because I had to inform my staff earlier today,” Limbaugh said during the live broadcast.“I can’t help but feel that I’m letting everybody down with this. “But the upshot is that I have been diagnosed with advanced lung cancer.” He said that while he undergoes treatment, “my intention is to come here every day I can and do this program as normally and as competently and expertly as I do each and every day, because that is the source of my greatest satisfaction professionally, personally.”…  


Impeachment witness Vindman fired, escorted out of White House after Trump acquittal

By John Roberts & Brooke Singman{ } ~ Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman, who made waves as a witness during the Trump impeachment proceedings, was fired Friday by the National Security Council… and escorted off of the White House grounds, Fox News has confirmed. Vindman was on detail to the National Security Council from the Department of Defense, and it is expected he will return there. It comes just two days after President Trump was acquitted in the Senate on the impeachment charges brought by the House last year over his dealings with Ukraine. In a lengthy statement, Vindman’s attorney, David Pressman, confirmed that Vindman had been escorted out of the White House on Friday. “There is no question in the mind of any American why this man’s job is over, why this country now has one less soldier serving it at the White House,” Pressman said. “LTC Vindman was asked to leave for telling the truth. His honor, his commitment to right, frightened the powerful.” A senior administration official also told Fox News that Vindman’s twin brother Lt. Col. Yevgeny Vindman has also left the National Security Council. Yevgeny Vindman was assigned to the office that vetted publications like former national security adviser John Bolton’s book – though he has said he was not involved in the vetting of the Bolton manuscript. The news comes after reports that the White House was weighing options to dismiss Vindman from the NSC in an effort to shrink its foreign policy bureaucracy. Bloomberg reported Thursday that the White House planned to frame Vindman’s exit as part of an NSC staff downsizing, not retaliation. Trump, when asked about the reports Friday, told reporters that he was “not happy with him.” “You think I’m supposed to be happy with him? I’m not,” Trump said, adding that a decision would be made soon. Meanwhile, Defense Secretary Mark Esper appeared to welcome the speculation that Vindman could be reassigned back to the Pentagon…  


Muslims Celebrate! Harvard Declares Koran ‘Best Book on Justice’

by Raymond Ibrahim{ } ~ Muslims around the world are thrilled at the recent news: “Harvard University ranks the Koran as the best book on justice,” is the January 20, 2020 headline of a report published by Youm7… a popular Egyptian news site visited by millions of Arabic readers.  It writes in translation: The official website of the World Muslim Communities Council  said on social media that, after lengthy, scientific studies that closely examined the rules of justice contained in the Noble Koran, the American university of Harvard has ranked the Noble Koran as the best book on justice….  In its final evaluation, Harvard University’s Classification Committee cited verses from the Noble Koran which confirm that the Noble Koran is a book replete with the rules of human justice … and that Islam has no room for injustice but rather includes tolerance and respect for the other. Several other leading news websites and newspapers—including Al Ahram, Egypt’s most widely circulated and state owned newspaper founded in 1875—carried the story, followed by all sorts of triumphant celebrations on social media. But is it true? Did Harvard make such a pronouncement?  No. The real story is that, back in 2012, a group of law students painted a number of historical quotes dealing with justice on the walls of a Harvard building. Known as the “Words of Justice,” they consist of 33 quotes from a variety of thinkers and civilizations—including African, Chinese, European, and Hindu—from 600 BC to the present. Among some of the more recognizable names and documents quoted are Cicero, Augustine, Aquinas, the Magna Carta, Benjamin Franklin, Immanuel Kant, Gandhi, and Martin Luther King Jr.  Among these 33 quotes is one that is Islamic, derived from Koran: O you who have believed, be persistently standing firm in justice, witnesses for Allah, even if it be against yourselves or parents and relatives. Whether one is rich or poor, Allah is more worthy of both. So follow not personal inclination, lest you not be just (4:135). That’s it—the entire story.  There were no “lengthy, scientific studies,” nor “classification committees,” that led Harvard to announce that the Koran is the “best book on justice.”  Rather, one Islamic quote was deemed worthy of inclusion with 32 other non-Islamic quotations. What to make of this shameful episode? Why would Muslims fabricate such a story? More to the point, why would they even care what infidel Harvard thinks in the first place?… No, Harvard University made no such claim.  

scumbag/liar-Schiff Asked Bolton to Submit an Affidavit, His Alleged Response Tells You Everything About that Fiasco

by Nick Arama{ } ~ House Intel Chair scumbag/liar-Adam Schiff (D-CA) was on with Rachel Maddow on Wednesday night when he dropped some news that was pretty interesting… in light of all that had gone on in the impeachment trial. Last week, the impeachment trial was rocked by a New York Times story which claimed to have information about what was in the draft of a book by former Trump national security adviser John Bolton. Supposedly the book contained comments about Trump wanting to link investigations to withholding aid to Ukraine. But there were several problems with this story. There were no quotes from the book in the story and it wasn’t even clear that’s what Bolton actually said, since he never confirmed it. Second, it was pretty much irrelevant anyway since there was never actually any quid pro quo made to Ukraine according to the Ukrainians, the witnesses who testified and the transcript of the Ukraine call that was at the crux of the matter. Rachel Maddow mentioned “Bolton’s statements” uncritically without noting any of the above problems and spoke about how Senate Judiciary Committee Chair scumbag liar-Jerry Nadler had said that at some time in the future they might subpoena Bolton to testify. scumbag/liar-Schiff explained that there hadn’t been any decision made as to whether to subpoena Bolton. He said that he and scumbag liar-Nadler had decided with the House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi they would decide on that after the conclusion of the impeachment trial. What he said next is where it gets interesting. scumbag/liar-Schiff claims that after the vote against having more witnesses went down to defeat on Friday, Jan. 31, Democrats reached out to Bolton’s legal counsel to try to get an affidavit from Bolton about what he knew. According to scumbag/liar-Schiff, Bolton refused to submit such an affidavit. So if that’s actually true, that means after all that, after all the nonsense that the Democrats pulled over it, Bolton wasn’t willing to speak up or isn’t able to back up the claimed report under oath. So either he’s saving it all for the book or the report was only about teasing something that wasn’t real to hurt the president. All the liberals who had embraced Bolton over the claim are now flipping on a dime saying to boycott his book.    

Trump ‘Acquitted for Life’

Thomas Gallatin:  Wednesday was a memorable day for our Republic. For only the third time in U.S. history, the Senate voted to acquit the president of articles of impeachment introduced by the House. To this day, no U.S. president has been convicted by the Senate and removed from office, and with President Donald Trump the vote wasn’t even close. In a clear repudiation of the House Democrats’ partisan impeachment charade, the Senate voted 53-47 and 52-48 acquitting Trump of the Democrats’ two vacuous charges. The lone Republican siding with the Democrats on the “abuse of power” charge was, unsurprisingly, rino-Mitt Romney, the GOP presidential nominee who lost to Barack scumbag/lia-nObama. Thus ends the most hyper-partisan impeachment in U.S. history.

Trump celebrated his acquittal and promised to further respond to “our Country’s VICTORY on the Impeachment Hoax!” by noon Thursday. It certainly is a big win for the president, for the Republican Party, and for the country. Once again, the wisdom of our Framers was poignantly displayed, as the Democrats’ politically motived gambit failed precisely because impeachment was never designed or intended to be used as a political tool by the opposing party to oust a duly elected president over purely partisan sentiments. As The Wall Street Journal notes, “Chalk up one more victory for the Framers of the Constitution, who realized the dangers of political factions and created the Senate to check them.”Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi’s petulant action of tearing up her copy of Trump’s State of the Union Address perfectly matched the grossly partisan nature of the Democrats’ impeachment charade. Thus, in response to her declaration that Trump is “impeached for life,” House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy shared a video of himself declaring Trump “Acquitted for life” as he tears up a copy of the articles of impeachment.Getting back to the vote, what may have come as a minor surprise was the fact that Joe Manchin (WV) and Doug Jones (AL), Democrat senators representing solidly pro-Trump states, voted to convict Trump. Then again, it’s really not surprising at all. In Jones’s case, his chance for winning reelection in 2020 in deep-red Alabama is so slim that no matter how he voted he’s unlikely to win — so why break with his party? He might as well be a loyal sailor and go down with the ship.In Manchin’s case, the calculation was that of pragmatism. He’s not up for reelection until 2024, so that was hardly a pressing concern. The bigger factor was his standing within the party and the reality that if the Democrats win control of the Senate in November he doesn’t want to be on the wrong side of Chuck scumbag-Schumer for failing to hold the party line. In all likelihood, scumbag-Schumer also engaged in a little quid pro quo with Manchin to ensure his vote to convict. As we have previously noted, the Democrats’ primary aim with their impeachment gambit was not the removal of Trump but winning control of the Senate. scumbag-Schumer’s oft-repeated talking point is that Senate Republicans held an unfair impeachment trial. For that to have any appearance of credibility, he couldn’t have any Democrat defectors.Finally, immediately following the Senate’s acquittal vote, Majority Leader Mitch McConnell got back to business by filing cloture on several judges. He continues the  unrelentingly effort to act on Trump’s agenda to fill the nation’s federal courts with solid constitutionally committed judges.  ~The Patriot Post  


Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *