‘Mini AOC’ is back and funnier than ever after Dems exploit kids over ‘climate change’ hoax

bythenationalsentinel.com ~ You remember “Mini AOC,” right? She’s the young lady who resembles a young commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and who mocked her ceaselessly with hilarious videos… That is, until deranged Left-wing fucktards drove her off-line with threats of violence because, you know, when the Left is threatening kids, it’s okay. Well, Mini AOC, real name Ava Martinez, has returned with a new video posted to her Twitter account that lambasts the idiots who seriously believe “human-caused climate change” will destroy the planet in, “like,” 10 years and stuff. “The sky is falling! The sky is falling…in 12 years! Looks like politics are no longer off limits for children thanks to Greta. Wish someone would’ve made that clear a few months back. Comedy is much better than scare tactics and fear-mongering anyway,” she wrote as she posted her new vid. Greta is Greta Thunberg, the young lady from Sweden Democrats have been exploiting in their latest despicable tactic: Using kids to try to scare the shit out of Western youth so they will go the polls when they are old enough to vote and keep electing these retards to power. Greta, whose mother has written about her mental health issues, was paraded to the UN by scumbag Leftists so she could lecture world leaders about climate change and how they are “destroying” her future. It doesn’t matter that the claim is 100 percent bullshit. What is sad is that the young lady believes it — convinced by asshole Leftists that she has no future. Talk about child abuse. Anyway, young Ava takes all of them to task in her latest video, which ought to make thinking adults ask themselves, “If this kid gets it, how come so many adults don’t?” It’s good to have you back, Ava.  https://thenationalsentinel.com/2019/09/25/mini-aoc-is-back-and-funnier-than-ever-after-dems-exploit-kids-over-climate-change-hoax-video/  

VIDEO:  https://videopress.com/v/jxVq47wf

DiGenova reveals Soros ties to complaint: ‘This whistleblower needs to go to prison’

by Missy Halsey

{bizpacreview.com } ~ Joe diGenova thinks the whistleblower at the center of the latest controversy to oust President Trump belongs in jail… The New York Times partly revealed the identity of the whistleblower who claimed Trump had an inappropriate conversation with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky. Said whistleblower was a CIA officer who was detailed to the White House, and currently still works at the CIA. More troubling is the fact that the whistleblower is being represented by lawyer Andrew Bakaj. As BPR reported, Bakaj has deep ties to the Democrat Party and interned for Chuck scumbag-Schumer and scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton in 2001. His powerful representation didn’t scare off diGenova, who unloaded on the current scandal. loose lips liar-Joe Biden shook down the Ukrainian government. It’s very simple,” diGenova said on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity Tonight” on Thursday.“And they lied about Victor Shokin being corrupt … His son’s lawyers come in after Mr. Shokin is fired and apologized after records obtained from that law firm to Mr. Shokin and his representatives were having lied about him — this was a set-up.”…  https://www.bizpacreview.com/2019/09/27/digenova-reveals-soros-ties-to-complaint-this-whistleblower-needs-to-go-to-prison-831031?utm_campaign=bizpac&utm_content=Newsletter&utm_medium=Newsletter&utm_source=Get+Response&utm_term=EMAIL  

VIDEO:  https://rumble.com/v88v1o-joe-digenova-says-wh-whistleblower-at-center-of-ukraine-controversy-belongs.html

Congressional Democrats Have No Credibility On Impeachment 

By John Daniel Davidson 

{thefederalist.com  } ~The problem with the Democrats’ impeachment gambit—aside from the fact that it appears to rest largely on a complaint riddled with inaccuracies, falsehoods, and hearsay… is that the American people don’t trust Congress and will likely have little confidence in any impeachment process undertaken by Democratic congressional leaders. And no wonder. Ever since President Trump won the presidency in 2016, Democrats have been grasping for some pretext to invalidate the results of that election. First, it was the outlandish claim that if Trump didn’t liquidate his global business interests upon taking office, he would be in violation of the emoluments clause. Then it was more than two years of the Russian collusion hoax that fizzled with the release of the Mueller report this spring. Along the way, there were repeated attempts to pin obstruction of justice on Trump for his firing of FBI director scumbag-James Comey, as well as accusations about payments to Stormy Daniels, questions about Trump’s tax returns, and allegations of sexual assault. None of this, in the minds of the vast majority of Americans, ever approached a justification for impeachment. A Quinnipiac poll released Wednesday found that just 37 percent support impeachment. A Monmouth poll last month showed just 35 percent support. For years, polls on impeachment have stayed in this range. Democrats are therefore very far out of step with the American people on the question of impeachment, and it’s hard to see how the transcript of Trump’s conversation with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, much less the “whistleblower” complaint released Wednesday evening, will change that. The complaint, with its allegation that Trump solicited interference in our elections from a foreign country, is in effect a continuation of the Russian collusion narrative Democrats spent two years pushing, to no avail. In short, congressional Democrats don’t seem to appreciate how tenuous their position is now, or how a blatantly partisan impeachment inquiry could demolish all remaining confidence in our democratic institutions and set the country up for a crisis in the 2020 elections. Even if there were a plausible case for opening impeachment proceedings against Trump, this Congress lacks the credibility to conduct them. Democrats have demonstrated over the past three years that they will do anything, say anything, and entertain any outlandish theory if it means removing Trump from office and undoing the 2016 election… https://thefederalist.com/2019/09/27/congressional-democrats-have-no-credibility-on-impeachment/?utm_source=The+Federalist+List&utm_campaign=22f3c24165-RSS_The_Federalist_Daily_Updates_w_Transom&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_cfcb868ceb-22f3c24165-83771801  

Ukrainian official appears to cast doubt on quid pro quo claim

By Edmund DeMarche and Gregg Re  

{foxnews.com } ~ An unnamed Ukrainian official said that Kiev was not made aware that the U.S. suspended security funds until a month after President Trump’s call with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelensky… which calls into question the whistleblower’s account and Democrats’ arguments that there was a quid pro quo for the aid. The official told The New York Times that Zelensky’s government was unaware about the aid issue until a month after Trump’s July 25 phone call in which he discussed loose lips liar-Joe Biden and his son Hunter. The whistleblower complaint – citing U.S. officials – claimed that officials in Kiev knew that the military aid could be in jeopardy in early August, but the whistleblower admitted to not knowing “how or when they learned of it.” Republicans may seize on the apparent  timeline inconsistencies and claim that if a quid pro quo was in place for the roughly $391 million in frozen aid, Ukrainian officials would know about it. Zelensky said earlier this week that he never felt pressured by Trump to investigate the loose vlips liar-Bidens. Trump insisted that he wanted to make sure the country was weeding out corruption before providing the funds. Democrats insist that Trump was wrong to bring up a political opponent to a foreign leader, and that even if he didn’t explicitly make a demand, the innuendo was there. Democrats also took issue with the complaint’s claim that Trump employed his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani in the matter. The whistleblower’s complaint named Giuliani and claimed diplomats were upset about his role in pushing Kiev to open an investigation into the loose lips liar-Bidens. According to the whistleblower complaint, by mid-May, U.S. diplomat Kurt Volker sought to “contain the damage” from Giuliani’s outreach to Ukraine…  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ukrainian-official-appears-to-cast-doubt-on-quid-pro-quo-claim  

VIDEO:  https://video.foxnews.com/v/6089845988001/#sp=show-clips

Released transcripts vindicate Trump – but Democrats aren’t having it

bypatriotnewsalerts.com ~ The transcript of the call between President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has been released. Democrats, convinced the transcript would proves Trump’s guilt, demanded to see it, and Republicans wanted to end the drama… But when the transcript came out, all hell broke loose — because President Trump has won yet again. If there had indeed been some coercion of Ukraine by Trump on the transcript, then that would be cause for reprisal against him. But Democrats decided to launch impeachment proceedings before they had any proof — and it looks like they spoke too soon. The transcript was released unredacted, according to The Hill, and in the words of Mike Pence, it “completely vindicates” Trump. Indeed, Trump did nothing wrong; the “whistleblower” was spreading rumors with no proof. But did Democrats allow this issue to quietly disappear and retreat to lick their wounds? Nope. The transcript’s release prompted a wave of frantic statements from top Dems like House Speaker liar-Nancy Pelosi (CA) and Rep. worthless-Rashida Tlaib (MI), according to Breitbart. Even failed presidential candidate scumbag-Eric Swalwell had to get his take out there, tweeting: “This Ukraine transcript is Donald Trump’s version and he admitted to betrayal. America is too great of a country to be led by such a cheat.” Apparently, the new narrative is that the released transcript is “Trump’s version.” This implies that there is a separate, real version that proves Trump is guilty. It looks like the Democrats will really stop at nothing to find guilt where there isn’t any. The Dems will no doubt keep running with this, and nothing will stop them. They are willing to sacrifice any political credibility they may have had to pursue a lie. If Trump can continue to expose their dishonesty on a national scale, he will easily win re-election in 2020.  https://www.patriotnewsalerts.com/democrats-arent-having-it/    

.About That Whistleblower Complaint

Nate Jackson:  Many elected Democrats may not be able to find Ukraine on a map, but they do know President Donald Trump should be impeached for talking to its president. This morning’s news is that the still-anonymous whistleblower complaint that started the whole kerfuffle has been declassified, slightly redacted, and released. Is this the smoking gun?

Not really, because the complaint largely lays out what we already knew was an overblown accusation of Trump demanding a quid pro quo from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. In order to come to that conclusion, you have to put ellipses between at least 500 words of transcribed conversation — just as Leftmedia outlets are doing. But the fact that even some conservatives can read the transcript of Trump’s call and argue that the quid pro quo is evident indicates that the president was at a minimum not wise or well spoken in the call.That wouldn’t exactly be a first.According to the complaint, dated Aug. 12, “The President of the United States is using the power of his office to solicit interference from a foreign country in the 2020 U.S. election. This interference includes, among other things, pressuring a foreign country to investigate one of the President’s main domestic political rivals. The President’s personal lawyer, Mr. Rudolph W. Giuliani, is a central figure in this effort. Attorney General [William] Barr appears to be involved as well.”The whistleblower was not personally present or listening in on the phone call; he (or she) received his information secondhand (and some of it thirdhand). But he bolstered his credibility a bit by recounting three things Trump said that are indeed in the transcript:initiate or continue an investigation into the activities of former Vice President loose lips liar-Joseph Biden and his son, Hunter loose lips liar-Biden;assist in purportedly uncovering that allegations of Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election originated in Ukraine, with a specific request that the Ukrainian leader locate and turn over servers used by the Democratic National Committee (DNC) and examined by the U.S. cyber security firm Crowdstrike, which initially reported that Russian hackers had penetrated the DNC’s networks in 2016; andmeet or speak with two people the President named explicitly as his personal envoys on these matters, Giuliani and Attorney General Barr, to whom the President referred multiple times in tandem.Then, the complaint continues, “In the days following the phone call, I learned from multiple U.S. officials that senior White House officials had intervened to ‘lock down’ all records of the phone call, especially the official word-for-word transcript of the call that was produced — as is customary — by the White House Situation Room. This set of actions underscored to me that White House officials understood the gravity of what had transpired in the call.”And finally, regarding the timing of military aid to Ukraine, “On 18 July, an Office of Management and Budget (OMB) official informed Departments and Agencies that the President ‘earlier that month’ had issued instructions to suspend all U.S. security assistance to Ukraine. Neither OMB nor the NSC staff knew why this instruction had been issued. During interagency meetings on 23 July and 26 July, OMB officials again stated explicitly that the instruction to suspend this assistance had come directly from the President, but they still were unaware of a policy rationale. As of early August, I heard from U.S. officials that some Ukrainian officials were aware that U.S. aid might be in jeopardy, but I do not know how or when they learned of it.”Acting Director of National Intelligence Joseph Maguire is testifying on Capitol Hill this morning about the whistleblower complaint, so stay tuned to his assessment.But here’s the bottom line: It looks like the whistleblower suspects that Trump was running his own investigation into the origins of “Russiagate.” It also appears that Trump’s actions were predicated on the fact that he has little trust in U.S. intelligence agencies, which makes sense given their attempted coup. The more Trump sees of the intel community, the less he trusts it — and for good reason. He would rather have his own trusted guys, like Giuliani (for better or worse), run the investigation instead of officials in the Justice Department.It appears that Trump was working to ensure that, during a governmental transition in Ukraine, the investigation into scumbag/liar-Hillary Clinton and loose lips liar-Joe Biden operatives seeking to influence the Ukrainian government and the U.S. election in 2016 did not get swept under the rug. This seems more like Trump seeking to find the truth behind who all the players were behind Russiagate than him trying to dig up new dirt on loose lips liar-Biden.“Democrats ought not to be using the word ‘impeach’ before they have the whistleblower complaint or before they read any of the transcript,” warned Sen. Ben Sasse (R-NE) Wednesday. They now have both, of course, and they will argue that it’s more than enough to go on. For that reason, Sasse also cautioned his own party: “Republicans ought not to be rushing to circle the wagons to say there’s [nothing] there when there’s obviously lots that’s very troubling there.”Troubling but hardly conclusive or impeachable. And hysterical Democrats are going to have a tough time selling that to the American people, even with their Leftmedia super PAC shouting their talking points every night. Especially if people are reminded of how  Democrats colluded with Ukraine to defeat Trump.  ~The Patriot Post



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *