hanoi-John Kerry’s Family Fights for Border Security at Palatial French Villa Because of Terrorism


{westernjournal.com} ~ Following the law is for the little people, and enforcing secure borders is only for elites… That seems to be the conclusion after the family of hanoi-John Kerry rejected rules about land access in France, while demanding that migrants and hikers be kept away from their multi-million dollar property. hanoi-Kerry, the former liberal senator, presidential candidate, and secretary of state, spends a significant amount of time at his family’s ancestral home in Saint-Briac-sur-Mer, a beach escape and resort playground for the elite. It’s a lifestyle that most people in America and indeed the world can’t afford, and hanoi-Kerry’s family seems intent on keeping it that way. The laws of France say that a portion of all beaches must be public access, but the wealthy Saint-Briac residents don’t think that law applies to them. “Hikers demanding right of way along a pristine stretch of coastal France are locked in a legal war with villa owners in a posh Brittany resort town, not least the family of US statesman and former presidential candidate hanoi-John Kerry,” an AFP report published by MSNstated. “Under French law the country’s coastlines must be accessible to all,” the outlet continued. “But for decades Saint-Briac leaders have steadfastly refused to obey via a series of legal moves, in particular Senghor’s predecessor Brice Lalonde — hanoi-Kerry’s first cousin.”…But he’ll want open borders in America.  https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/john-kerrys-family-fights-border-security-palatial-french-villa-terrorism/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=patriotupdate&utm_campaign=dailyam&utm_content=libertyalliance


Mick Mulvaney Highlights Nancy Pulosi Position to Weaponize Government Shutdown as Part of Coordinated Resistance Agenda

by sundance

{theconservativetreehouse.com} ~ Incoming chief of staff Mick Mulvaney gives an impromptu press briefing to the media highlighting the position of incoming House Speaker Nancy Pulosi… and the democrat intention to weaponize the government shutdown. Career Democrats are working through a highly coordinated political agenda, defended by institutional media allies, that involve weaponizing the House of Representatives. If we take the empirical 2006 example as the starting point and overlay the 2018 landscape to modernize the predictive model, what results is a most likely scenario. First, any intellectually honest review must overlay the current political environment. In 2018 the scale of unchecked lawless behavior is a significant influence toward the differences we can expect from the last time Democrat/Marxists held congressional power. The term “Democrat-socialism”, in essence a Marxist approach, is now the dominant fuel within the professional DNC political operations. When the Democrats last held power in 2006, their actionable objective was toward a far-left, Saul Alinsky-type aggressive tone and influence; however, there was a need to couch that intention as they positioned Senator Barack scumbag/liar-nObama for the 2008 presidential election… https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/12/28/mick-mulvaney-highlights-nancy-pelosi-position-to-weaponize-government-shutdown-as-part-of-coordinated-resistance-agenda/

VIDEO 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0rkrZfgNws

VIDEO 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UluOOf69e28


Arizona Attorney General Argues BDS Seeks to ‘Strengthen’ Terror-Supporting Palestinian Groups

by Shiri Moshe

{algemeiner.com} ~ A brief filed last week by Arizona’s attorney general maintains that the boycott, divestment, and sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel aids terrorists… potentially marking the first time a US government official has formally taken such a stance, according to a lawyer familiar with the case. In an opening argument submitted to the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, Arizona Attorney General Mark Brnovich wrote that legislation enacted by his state in 2016 that bars public bodies from contracting with companies that boycott Israel seeks to prevent taxpayer funds from subsidizing discrimination based on nationality, national origin, and religion. The law, passed with bipartisan super-majorities, was blocked by a federal court in September following a lawsuit alleging First Amendment violations, with Judge Diane Humetewa ruling in favor of plaintiff Mikkel Jordahl, a state contractor who said his ability to boycott Israel in a professional capacity was being unconstitutionally limited. “A restriction of one’s ability to participate in collective calls to oppose Israel unquestionably burdens the protected expression of companies wishing to engage in such a boycott,” Humetewa determined… https://www.algemeiner.com/2018/12/28/arizona-attorney-general-argues-bds-seeks-to-strengthen-terror-supporting-palestinian-groups/?utm_content=news1&utm_medium=daily_email&utm_campaign=email&utm_source=internal/


Lindsey Graham Writes An Open Letter To Nancy Pulosi About The Border Wall

by Molly Prince

{dailycaller.com} ~ Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham told House Minority Leader Nancy Pulosi and her Democratic caucus on Friday… that there would not be a deal on a funding bill unless it included appropriations to construct a wall on the U.S.-Mexico border. “To Nancy Pulosi and the House Democrats,” Graham tweeted. “No Wall Money, No Deal.” The House passed a stopgap funding bill on Dec. 20 that included $5.7 billion for a border wall, however, with a 51-seat majority in the Senate, Republicans fell short of the necessary 60 votes needed to send it to President Donald Trump’s desk for signature. Senate Minority Leader Chuck scumbag/clown-Schumer vowed to kill the legislation on arrival in the Senate, and consequently, a government shutdown has been in effect since funding expired Dec. 21. Pulosi has reportedly walked away from further shutdown negotiations and pledged not to appropriate a single dollar toward funding a wall. The California congresswoman promised to put forth a funding bill that does not include any of Trump’s demands when she assumes the speakership in January… Its time to use your EO Trump.  https://dailycaller.com/2018/12/28/graham-pelosi-border-wall-deal/?utm_medium=email


Five Dumb Arguments Against ‘the Wall’


{spectator.org} ~ The benefits of building a wall on our southern border are so obvious and abundant that, in a sane political environment, there would be no debate about whether it should be done… Indeed, until Donald Trump made “the wall” a central component of his presidential platform, proposals for such an obstacle weren’t even controversial. As the President and others have pointed out, most Democrats supported the idea and have voted for legislation that included funding for the construction of some sort of physical barrier. Their policy pirouette on this common sense measure has thus led to some truly comical claims. Most of the arguments against the wall are variations of the perennial claim that Democrats and their “progressive” supporters make against any proposal of which they don’t approve — it won’t work. Just as they claim that the free market somehow doesn’t work in health care thus the urgent need for a centrally controlled, government-run medical system, they insist that a wall on the southern border will produce none of the outcomes promised by Trump. By far the most hilarious contribution to this genre was made by rapper Talib Kweli Greene, who took to Twitter and offered wall supporters the following history lesson: So, you’re unaware of the fact that nazi Germany had a wall called the Berlin Wall that was torn down in 1991 in order to foster humanity and diversity? Walls didn’t work for Nazis so why build them here? Build bridges not walls Nazi lover. After excavating himself from the mountain of ridicule beneath which he was inevitably buried pursuant to this exercise in smug ignorance, Greene took down the Tweet. Fortunately, the Western Journal published a screen capture so posterity will not find itself bereft of this valuable source of mirth. But Greene is by no means the only advocate of the Berlin Wall analogy. Last June, the Los Angeles Times published a column by Carolina Miranda titled, “What the dismantling of the Berlin Wall can teach us as Trump tries to build his wall.” The obvious answer is “absolutely nothing,” yet she conjured a comparison: This year, Feb. 5 marked the day that the wall had been gone as long as it had been up — 10,316 days … the deconstruction of the Berlin Wall and its attendant Cold War legacies highlights the construction of walls elsewhere — such as the “big, fat, beautiful wall” President Trump wants for the US-Mexico border…  https://spectator.org/five-dumb-arguments-against-the-wall/?utm_source=Daily+Afternoon+Email&utm_campaign=2bdb2960d4-EMAIL_CAMPAIGN_2018_12_28_07_22&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_d65fc4e11e-2bdb2960d4-104762253


Trump Threatens Total Border Shutdown if No Wall Funding

by Kaylee McGhee

{libertyheadlines.com} ~ President Trump promised to close the U.S. border with Mexico entirely if Democrats don’t agree to allocate $5 billion for the construction of a border wall… In a series of tweets on Friday, Trump blamed the “obstructionist” Democrats for the government shutdown, which is on its seventh day. Last week, Republicans appeared ready to approve a Senate-passed bill that would have funded the government through Feb. 8 without the border wall. But within hours, House Republicans backed by Trump rallied GOP members behind the president’s campaign promise and vowed to fight for full funding. Trump—whose efforts at establishing border security have repeatedly been thwarted by activist liberal courts issuing injunctions—criticized the nation’s weak immigration laws. He also attacked the Democrats for their stubborn refusal to compromise and said it’s less about the wall than it is about preventing the GOP from fulfilling its campaign promise… https://www.libertyheadlines.com/trump-shut-down-border/


How Compassionate Is the Democrats’ Open-Borders Policy?

by David Limbaugh

{townhall.com} ~ People are having fun lampooning commie-Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s selective exploitation of Scripture to support the Democrats’ advocacy of open borders, but let’s not allow this mirth to distract us from larger questions.

The incoming congresswoman tweeted: “Joy to the World! Merry Christmas everyone — here’s to a holiday filled with happiness, family, and love for all people. Including refugee babies in mangers + their parents.”

Let’s put aside that commie-Ocasio-Cortez is conflating the Nativity story described in Luke’s Gospel, in which Mary and Joseph went to Bethlehem to register for the Roman census, with Matthew’s description of the couple’s fleeing to Egypt to protect Jesus from King Herod’s decree to murder every boy age 2 or younger in Bethlehem. The latter example also fails because there was no illegal border crossing into Egypt, as it, too, was part of the Roman Empire and, in any event, because Mary and Joseph were following God’s command for them to flee to protect Jesus; a divine order trumps all man-made laws. Let’s also defer until a later time the bizarre scolding about refugee babies from one whose party virtually supports abortion on demand.

commie-Ocasio-Cortez’s biblical illiteracy is irrelevant. The point is that she is carrying on an unfortunate practice of cherry-picking Scripture for political gain. She’s simply trying to show that conservatives have no compassion for “foreigners” or the lost and that they are egregious hypocrites and frauds for holding themselves out as Christians while declining to model Jesus’ love.

In a less imperfect world, I wouldn’t have to bother refuting this, but Democrats have done a masterful job permeating our culture with these slanders, and far too many people actually believe them — just as they believe their equally wicked mantra that we are hateful racists, sexists and homophobes.

It’s wicked because they know it’s not true. But the Democratic Party’s main recruiting strategy is to show that Democrats care about people and that Republicans don’t. In a world where supposedly good intentions are the yardstick, results don’t matter.

Though I am convinced that the average conservative has as much compassion or more than the average liberal, I realize I’m not going to convince anyone of that just by asserting it.

What might be more helpful would be to examine how compassionate and prudent the Democrats’ policies on immigration and related issues are in practice.

Underlying commie-Ocasio-Cortez’s tweet on refugees is her implied charge that Republicans don’t care about refugees, foreigners or other vulnerable people — that we would deny asylum to those truly fleeing their countries to escape harm and we sadistically desire to separate children from their parents.

These are all malicious lies. Republicans don’t want to repeal asylum laws, but they do want the laws to be applied in an orderly fashion to ensure that we help those truly in need. When Democrats support open borders, sanctuary cities, across-the-board amnesty and a catch-and-release policy, they are incentivizing border anarchy, human trafficking and lawlessness. They are endangering American citizens and discriminating against immigrants who played by the rules.

The question we ought to insist on discussing is whether Democrats even believe in the concept of nation-states anymore — and specifically American sovereignty — as opposed to deferring to some enlightened global entity. Do they even remotely embrace the American idea anymore? Socialism and top-down authoritarianism were hardly contemplated by the Framers. I might tell commie-Ocasio-Cortez that the Apostle Paul said, “From one man God made all the nations, that they should inhabit the whole earth; and he marked out their appointed times in history and the boundaries of their lands.”

It is axiomatic that a nation cannot exist without borders and border enforcement. This is especially true of America because its uniqueness is in its founding ideas, which are enshrined in the Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

Our patriotic ancestors knew that our freedom tradition depends on adherence to the Constitution and on a citizenry dedicated to ordered liberty — understanding that freedom is meaningless and ephemeral unless undergirded by the rule of law. They believed that the government’s first duty is to protect its citizens from domestic and foreign threats. They disagreed on whether and to what extent we should export our democratic principles but never on whether we should preserve them for ourselves.

Conservatives fervently believe in ethnic diversity. America is undeniably — and gloriously — an amalgam of countless ethnicities. But we also believe in the assimilation of all ethnicities into a common culture committed to the Constitution and rule of law — as opposed to a Balkanized society of competing groups that are suspicious and hostile toward one another.

This is why the legal path to citizenship and its attendant naturalization process have involved the applicants’ pledge of loyalty to this great nation of which they want to become a part.

Democrats need to explain whether they still believe in the American system itself and in America’s sovereignty — in its right and duty to enforce its immigration laws, as well as the orderly, controlled system of immigration those laws establish. Let them explain how eviscerating these laws would be in the best interest of America and its citizens in any respect, how flooding our borders with people we can’t support or assimilate would help either those immigrants or existing American citizens.

If we care about preserving America as the freest, most prosperous and most benevolent nation in the world, then we cannot continue to ignore border security and thwart the rule of law. How compassionate would the world be without America?



Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *