WHAT is SCYTL & WHY Should You Be VERY, VERY Concerned?

Finally, there seems to be growing concern about vote fraud. Over the last couple of months I have attended meetings about vote fraud and have become more alarmed that it may extend beyond our borders.  See:  Nov 2012 vote tabulation raising concerns  like: True the Vote (http://www.truethevote.org/) and The King Street Patriots among others, have been reaching out to teach us what they have learned. Based on some of that information, and a suggestion in an email from The King Street Patriots, I decided to help some of my friends and family participate easily because many people are good at forwarding emails, but do not follow through… (See sample letter below).

Here’s another of those quiet, subtle, but very dangerous little stories that has somehow slipped past all the mainstream media outlets.

The United States of America has a brand new private VOTE COUNTING company that the Obama administration has personally handpicked.

The company is called Scytl and it is based in Michelle Obama’s most favorite vacation spot, Barcelona, Spain.

Forget the fact that Barack is once again providing jobs for people in another country; there are much bigger fish to fry in this story.

According to the “About Us” section of the Scytl website:

Scytl is a worldwide leader in the development of secure solutions for electoral modernization.

Scytl was formed as a spin-off from a leading research group at the Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. This group, funded by the Spanish Government’s Ministry of Science and Technology, has pioneered the research on e-voting security in Europe since 1994 and has produced significant scientific results, including 25 scientific papers published in international journals and the first two European Ph.D. theses on electronic voting security, by Prof. Joan Borrell and Scytl’s founder Dr. Andreu Riera (in 1996 and 1999, respectively). This research group also participated in the first Internet binding election in Europe (i.e., the 1997 election to the Presidency of the IEEE IT Spanish chapter).

Scytl has customers both in the private and public sectors. Some of these customers represent leading references in the electoral modernization market (e.g., governments in Spain, the USA, France, Austria, Switzerland, United Kingdom, Philippines, Argentina, Mexico, Finland and Australia) and are pioneering new electronic voting applications. Scytl’s solutions have been successfully used in multiple projects worldwide, some of which represent breakthrough projects for the electoral modernization industry.

So what does this mean for all us non-European voters here in America?

According to Michael Savage, “[T]his critical component to a free election, the transparent tabulation of votes, will not be handled by individual precincts but by a company over which we will have little control…The problem is that once the votes are merged, it will be impossible to go back and check their integrity at the local level. It is very likely that this is the final step in Barack Obama’s corruption of the voting process. It has the promise of enabling him and his cohorts to control the outcomes of federal elections with no accountability. On top of that it’s one more step toward a global government.”

There are no Americans on the Board of Directors of Scytl—but CEO Pere Valles once lived and worked in Barack’s old stomping grounds, Chicago. From the Scytl website:

Mr. Valles joined Scytl in March 2004 after spending most of his professional career in the United States. Prior to joining Scytl, Mr. Valles was Vice-President and Chief Financial Officer of GlobalNet, a NASDAQ publicly-traded telecommunications company headquartered in Chicago. Mr. Valles assisted GlobalNet in becoming one of the leading providers of Voice-over-IP in the world and was instrumental in the successful sale of the company to the Titan Corporation, a NYSE defense company. At GlobalNet, Mr. Valles was responsible for designing and executing the strategic plan that led to an increase in revenues from US$ 25 million to over US$ 100 million and brought the company to profitability. Previously, Mr. Valles had worked as Senior Manager for KPMG‘s Mergers & Acquisitions group in Los Angeles and Miami providing financial and strategic consulting services to private equity groups and corporations involved in acquisitions in the United States, Latin America and Europe. During his career at KPMG, Mr. Valles actively participated in more than 20 transactions in the telecommunications and technology areas. Mr. Valles has a bachelor degree in Economics and a bachelor degree in Law from the University of Barcelona and a MBA (summa cum laude) from Indiana University.

In 2008 the Florida Department of State looked into using Scytl’s remote voting system but turned it down. Their reasons:

Our findings identified vulnerabilities that, in the worst case, could result in (i) voters being unable to cast votes, (ii) an election result that does not accurately reflect the will of the voters, or (iii) disclosure of confidential information, such as the votes cast by a voter. The extent to which these vulnerabilities could actually be exploited in the ODBP is beyond the scope of this report given our lack of system context. Secure handling and audit of the Voter Choice Records may defend against some or all of these vulnerabilities, but these procedures were not available for review.

We identify three findings of particular significance:

  • The use of supervised polling stations provides significantly better protection against voter coercion or vote- selling than is present in some other absentee voting systems, such as voting by mail.
  • Two copies of each vote are stored: one electronically, and another on paper as a Voter Choice Record. This pro- vides redundancy that is not present in existing vote-by-mail systems. If the electronic votes are well-protected, then they can enable audit of the paper records in ways that are not currently possible.
  • After casting their ballot, each voter is given a receipt that is intended to give voters confidence that their votes were “Counted as Cast”. These receipts do not achieve their stated goal of allowing voters to “independently verify that their ballots have been correctly accounted for.” These receipts might indicate that a vote was received and decrypted by the county (a property not typically provided by current postal voting systems), but they do not provide assurance that the voter’s vote was correctly recorded.

Also interesting to note, one of the organizations on “Scytl Partners” tab is Oracle, a major supporter to all-things-Democrat. And another Scytl Partner is a spooky “global governance” organization called Gov2u.org. Check them out. Yikes.

There are many, many reasons for all of us to be concerned about Obama’s choice in vote-counting this November—yet no one seems to be up-in-arms about this other than Michael Savage and a handful of Internet bloggers.

Goodbye ACORN, hello Scytl…

*This is all part of Team Obama’s plan, Progressive plan… to fight voter ID laws wherever they can to allow dead people and non-citizens to vote as well as allowing them and others to vote multiple times, to use rigged voting machines,to  intimidate people at the polls, to control the Secretaries of State, who certify the votes and now to use remote vote counting companies and systems that are tied to the Democrats and global governance supporters.  Even the use of online voting and overuse of absentee ballots, when not needed, should be of concern! Ww need to wake-up and stand-up America.  A small group of bloggers and conservative pundits have been warning about this for years. Now that Election 2012 is less than 7-months away people are finally waking-up.  Time to get involved and stand up (immediately and fervently) before it is too late!!  M~ – h/t to MJ & AJ

Related:

How Does Team Obama Plan to Steal Election 2012 And What Will You D...

Voter Fraud – Hacking Democracy

Here is a simple sample letter (by GILTN1stborn)

Sample email:

Dear YOUR Sec. of State name here,

Over the last several months I have been following the stories about SCYTL, a foreign vote tabulation company in Spain. There is a long list of reasons why this is alarming and unacceptable. I know the State of Florida declined to use these systems in 2008: http://election.dos.state.fl.us/voting-systems/pdf/FinalReportSept1...

I would like to know if YOUR state here has used or intends to use SCTYL or any affiliates in vote tabulation.

I would also like to request that you change your choice for vote tabulation before Election 2012 and for any other future elections if the answer is yes.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

YOUR NAME

God Bless America

Stealing Election 2012 through voter fraud and vote counting fraud are two of the main things the various tea party groups and concerned patriots should be focusing on and negating practices like utilizing companies like SCYTL should be at the forfront of all our concerns!!

Source:  AskMarion

Views: 2152

Tags: 2012, Election, SCYTL, Team-Obama, alert, fraud, voter

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Nation to add comments!

Join Tea Party Nation

Comment by Marion Algier on April 22, 2012 at 4:25pm

SNOPES is part of the Soros network...

FYI:

Snopes…. For Dopes?

Posted on July 14, 2010 by Ask Marion

For those of us who have used SNOPES to verify info: Snopes receives funding from an undisclosed source. The source is undisclosed because Snopes refuses to disclose that source. The Democratic Alliance, a funding channel for uber-Leftist (Marxist) Billionaires (George Soros etc.), direct funds to an "Internet Propaganda Arm" pushing these views. The Democratic Alliance has been reported to instruct Fundees to not disclose their funding source.

For the past few years (http://www.snopescom/ has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the ‘tell-all final word’ on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. It is run by a husband and wife team – that’s right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It’s just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby. David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research.

The reason for the questions – or skepticisms – is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the ‘true’ bottom of various issues.

A few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the Internet, ‘supposedly’ the Mikkelson’s claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort ‘ever’ took place. I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this and I gave him Bud Gregg’s contact phone numbers – and Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec’s at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg that no one from snopes.comever contacted anyone with State Farm.

Yet, snopes.comissued a statement as the ‘final factual word’ on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things – not!

Then it has been learned the Mikkelson’s are very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the Internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson’s liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock?

So, I say this now to everyone who goes to snopes.comto get what they think to be the bottom line fact ‘proceed with caution.’ Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Plus,you can always search a subject and do the research yourself.

I have found this to be true also! Many videos of Obama I tried to verify on Snopes and they said they were False. Then they gave their liberal slant! I have suspected some problems with snopes for some time now, but I have only caught them in half-truths. If there is any subjectivity they do an immediate full left rudder.

I have recently discovered that Snopes.com is owned by a flaming liberal and this man is in the tank for Obama. There are many things they have listed on their site as a hoax and yet you can go to You tube yourself and find the video of Obama actually saying these things. So you see, you cannot and should not trust Snopes.com, ever for anything that remotely resembles truth! I don’t even trust them to tell me if email chains are hoaxes anymore.

A few conservative speakers on MySpace told me about Snopes.com. A few months ago and I took it upon myself to do a little research to find out if it was true. Well, I found out for myself that it is true. Anyway just FYI please don’t use Snopes.com anymore for fact checking and make your friends aware of their political leanings as well. Many people still think Snopes.com is neutral and they can be trusted as factual. We need to make sure everyone is aware that that is a hoax in itself.

Thank you,

Alan Strong

Alan Strong CEO/Chairman

Commercial Programming Systems, Inc.

4400 Coldwater Canyon Ave. Suite

200 Studio City, CA. 91604-5039

Read more: http://thehuffingtonriposte.blogspot.com/2010/05/snopes-exposed.htm...

Comment by Shavager on April 22, 2012 at 4:20pm

Before everybody out there runs to Snopes for their information, Barbara and David Mikkelson are the owners of Snopes--neither is a LAWYER or professional investigative researcher.  It's supposed to be a "mom and pop" company, it's a private company that DOES NOT reveal their funding or who has money invested in keeping the site open besides advertising revenue.  She is a Canadian, he purports to be a "former" Republican--that's their story and they're sticking to it. They say their funding is strictly from advertising, if they receive funding from any leftwing organizations they deny it.  Just like Glenn Beck says, DON'T take their word for it, check out the facts with YOUR own research.

Comment by william f. duryea on April 22, 2012 at 3:33pm

Marion, That you for this confirming article on this company. Apparently few had heard of it because I had posted a request via blog on the Beverly Huffman's piece on April 13th., and no one had responded with confirmation of the intel I had recieved. As I had stated before, so much for the power of the "vote". If this information does not get people motivated to get envolved and speak out... nothing will! God bless us against the erosion of our Constitutional rights, freedom and liberty. Where are elected representatives and their oversight?

Comment by Joseph Michael Painter on April 22, 2012 at 1:16pm

I find it very strange that the election committee's in the US would use a foreign company to do their vote counting.

Comment by Juls on April 22, 2012 at 1:13pm

Ron, I understand that info on the internet must be taken with a grain of salt until or unless verified - preferably through a variety of different sources.  Snopes may be one part of that process, but too often IMO it has become the only and final source. 

Comment by Fallon L. Foster on April 22, 2012 at 12:58pm

Have a laugh on the issue:  http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=fvwp&NR=1&v=tcdUvKr8sDE

Comment by Fallon L. Foster on April 22, 2012 at 12:48pm

Snopes has one source: "Media", aka MSM, LSM, Agenda-Media, StenographicPool, Linotypers for Lenin, etc.

 Funding for Snopes matters little when they refer only to "Authorized Journalists".

Obama could not sell the contract, as a national contract for tabulations never existed.  The Dept. of State had to approve the sale of SOE to Skittles.  That is all they had to do, and all that they legally could do.

As to the tin-foil rayzists, I don't care what they call me so long as the votes are cast by legitimate voters, and the tally is entirely and provably reflective of each and every legitimate vote cast.  Since that is not likely to be the case, the election will have to be so lop-sided that even the swing states carry little swing.

IF IT AIN'T CLOSE, THEY CAN'T CHEAT [ well, they can; but, it won't matter!]

Comment by Ron Hayden on April 22, 2012 at 12:42pm

to Juls: We ALL must become smarter consumers of information, especially from the internet. Always consider it a great rumor mill and just like your own friends, treat the info's veracity based on experience with the source. Snopes is not without bias but still tries to get to the truth. Learn to read it for the loaded words that tell you if there is an agenda breaking through. In this case, IMHO, Snopes may be letting us know that the facts are false and we need to look at the motives for passing this email around.

If all we do is strike everything that doesn't meet our own World View, we are just as bad as those we blame for the impending demise of America as we know it.

Comment by Juls on April 22, 2012 at 12:21pm

When did Snopes become the all-knowing, unquestioned arbitrator of internet information?   

Comment by Fallon L. Foster on April 22, 2012 at 12:03pm

Here's the guy who admitted to designing a vote-stealing program at the request of the then-serving Speaker of the House in State of Florida... timed for use in the Bush/Gore election...completely undetectable.

You may have seen it then - it is worthy of review -

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mq9WVuKGwOM&feature=related

Tea Party Nation is a social network

 



© 2013   Created by Judson Phillips.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!