
I remember sitting in my college dormitory cubicle as a Freshman at The Ohio State University many years ago, drinking more beer than any one 18 year old idiot should ever have been allowed to imbibe. As with all drunks, and various other people who altered their thought processes through better living via modern or in this case, ancient chemistry, I came up with, and went along with some real gems. Our drunken discussions included the Kennedy assassination, The Loch Ness Monster, UFO's, Bigfoot, the Face on Mars, and what ever else the world of crazies tried to convince us was real. In that drunken stupor you see, (which my Freshman and Sophomore years in college pretty much were, in their entirety,) I still found it impossible to believe that anyone could fall for those particular pieces of nonsense. The thing about conspiracy theories is this, while they may be fun to kick around, there is also a certain amount of malevolence to most of them. (The gems we came up with usually involved idiotic pranks, spray paint, mild explosives, more beer, swimming in nearby rivers, or any other thing a parent may worry about their foolish unsupervised teen kids doing.)
There is a certain amount of narcissism that is necessary for these things to be believed. The thought that, "I might know something that the majority of my fellow humans are clueless about," lends a feeling of unearned gravitas to the fraternity of believers. Each theory itself becomes a sort of cult, an us versus them club in which the non believers are viewed as some sort of brainwashed group of lemmings.
Another aspect of the phenomenon is that it is difficult for people to believe that life itself would have the unmitigated gall to allow the universe to be in any way, shape, or form, chaotic. The thought that an American President, one as beloved as much as JFK was at the time, could be brought down by such an unimportant, and until then extremely insignificant little punk that Lee Harvey Oswald was, seemed anathema to the inherent order of the cosmos that each human by his nature expects. Great men and great institutions you see must only be brought down by other great men or great institutions. This may shock some of you, but the single most dangerous animal on planet Earth is a mosquito. Mosquito's account for more human deaths each year than any other cause, (not combined, but individually.)
Another aspect of this phenomenon is every person's need to be necessary. Knowing the hidden truth behind disastrous events that few people know of is something that lends the purveyor of these theories instant self importance, and espousing that truth to the brainwashed masses so that they might awaken, is certainly a valuable part of the gravitas earned. The self promotional delusion that all of man kind is benefiting from the police action of spilling the beans, elevates the conspiracy theorist to the head of the class of all importance.
Here is a fairly funny compilation of some of the more popular candidates for what I like to call the soup pot hall of fame.
Those things in themselves are not really harmful. I can even understand the fun that some might find in participating in the discussion. Are both of the Presidents Bush actually descendants of reptilian aliens seeking to take over the Earth? Admit it, if you don't believe it, (and it would take years of abusing hallucinogenic drugs to believe it,) then the smallest hint of a smile formed on your lips, or at least a smirk. For about three and one half seconds, pondering these insane meanderings of the human mind seeking to form an alternate reality can be a fun way to pass the time when you just want to shut your brain down for some deserved vacation from the reality that is there every day.
There is a down side to all of this however, and that comes with a fourth aspect to those theories. They require a healthy dose of paranoia. Each of these theories requires a bogey man to be the locus of the conflict. And as some other groups in our world learned via rather harsh lessons, being the bogey man is not much fun at all. With the Presidents Bush being space aliens theory, the bogey man are the Bush men, and of course the non existent reptilian space aliens. I say go ahead and hate on those space aliens all you want, since they don't exist in the real world, there's no harm. Not all conspiracy theories however are quite so benign.
I'm going to let you in on a secret here, not a conspiracy, just a peek into where I'm coming from. My article a couple of days ago about Norman Borlaug brought out some interesting counterpoints. One person, and one only, accused me of being part of the Zionist conspiracy to control the world. Only an evil Zionist you see, or someone who was spoon fed his lessons in history from the Zionist effort to brainwash the masses would be willing to defend the evil Monsanto Corporation which is undoubtedly operating totally at the behest of those evil Zionists who wish to inflict their nefarious plans on the rest of man kind. I had to paraphrase his comments, as the administrators of that particular forum made it a point to delete his ramblings. So, I recommended that he wear a soup pot as a helmet complete with tin foil insulation and went about my day.
Then I decided to write about it all. There is a difference between conspiracy and conspiracy theory. That difference is called evidence. I once heard it said by a physicist that extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. That seems like sound advice for every aspect of my life. This is not a politically left or politically right kind of thing. I have seen these theories espoused from both sides of the aisle, but there is a sameness to all of them. Extraordinary claims are made, and a bogeyman is identified to be blamed for some perceived ill. While discussing my article which admittedly was written as a dagger meant for the, "organic farming," crowd, I was hit with the following gem by the same fellow who accused me of being part of the Zionist entity who wished to control the world.
The Kosher industry has been extorting money from almost every consumer in America for decades, did you mind paying the kosher tax for putting their symbols on every food stuff? Where barely a couple percent of consumers actually buy Kosher?
Before we move on, a special note on my problem with the, "Organic farming," crowd:
I could care less about your personal choices regarding what you choose to eat or purchase. In fact, I applaud your choices and commitment to your principles. It is your infliction upon my personal freedom to choose for myself that I protest. For all of the protestations about the massive agricultural lobby and how it has corrupted our legislative process, I can not help but notice that it is the, "organic only," lobby which seeks to outlaw the group who wishes to use scientific farming methods as a means to feed the world, and not the other way round. This group wishes to see all non approved methods of farming outlawed within the next fifty years, and that's hardly something envisioned or attempted by a group of victims.
And now, back to my point:
Let's look at this particular conspiracy from birth to what should be its abortion, just as an example. For years, Rabbis have been going into America's food producing companies, at the request of their congregants, to help people of the Jewish faith determine which foods were safe to eat from their religious perspective. For those who are christian, (and yes I realize that there are non Judeo Christian people in America,) people who wish to live their lives according to Kashrut law, will avoid purchasing prepared foods in a grocery if they are not sure if that product was prepared accordingly. They may want to eat Doritos for example, but might not be certain that the fat that those addictively delicious chips were fried was not rendered from some verboten animal, like a pig. The corresponding food manufacturers invite the visits because they wish to sell to as large a market as they can. The Rabbis do it for free, and if the product passes muster, then the corresponding companies are allowed to put one of the Hebrew Union College's kosher approved symbols on their product. All it says is this, this symbol certifies that those keeping kosher are allowed to eat this. The entire process has added nothing to the cost of the product.
By the way, the Muslims do the same thing with foods prepared according to their dietary restrictions, and yet somehow, I have heard nothing about the Islam Tax. A few years after this fairly recent innovation, CAIR, and we'll discuss this fine group of people later on, invented and began disseminating a rumor that this symbol represented a hidden tax imposed by that vast Zionist Conspiracy, of which apparently I am now a member, despite having missed each and every one of the secret meetings.
CAIR, for those of you who do not know, is the public relations tentacle of the Muslim Brotherhood, which operate here in America. They are also unindicted co-conspirators in the Holy Land Foundation Terror Funding Plot. CAIR, amongst its many other activities, pays couch potatoes to sit in front of their computers and spread their anti-Semitic crap on various web based forums, such as the comment boards here. They publish material and push their bile through a slickly funded campaign, and have made some inroads on a few fronts. The Kosher tax and the USS Liberty are two examples of those efforts. (The Liberty is a different topic entirely, and please let's not go down that road on this thread. Anyone who wishes would easily convince me to open that particular can of worms and give it the discussion it so richly deserves all to itself.)
As I said, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. In this, and every case of the conspiracy theory, evidence is absent. What these stories have are a few disparate facts, no evidence, and a story made up to fit those facts. There is a reason why our system of jurisprudence requires the person making an allegation to prove it. Proving the negative is damn near impossible. I can not prove that none of the male members of the Bush family are reptilian aliens. I can not prove that I am not a reptilian alien. Yes, there is a symbol designed by the Hebrew Union College on many of the food products that you buy. That is where the factual portion of this particular story's legend ends. I can not prove that there is no Kosher Tax, only that I have never ever seen any portion of our tax code, or any tax code which alludes to such. I am not an expert on our tax code by any stretch of the imagination, and yes there are passages that I have never seen, but the burden of proof does not lie with me. I have never seen one of these imbeciles present anything even remotely resembling evidence to support their extraordinary claim. When pushed for such evidence, here are some of the responses that you'll get.
Open your eyes man.
I'm just asking questions man.
You can't prove it isn't true.
Look at the facts, that's my evidence.
Quit allowing yourself to be brainwashed.
Then there's the fact that these stories are invariably a liable which smears an entire swath of our fellow citizens. The 9/11, "truthers," merely ask you to accuse every member of the U.S. government of either murdering their very own friends and neighbors, or acting to cover up those murders. The same is true for the, "Chemtrail," crowd. In each of these stories, we are asked to hate some random swath of society, and that's evil. Full disclosure here, I'm Jewish. So, imagine my surprise to learn that I was involved in some sort of conspiracy to not only impose a tax upon the remainder of society, despite the fact that I am really against all taxation, but that I'm part of a cabal which seeks world domination. I have news for each and every person reading this. I have worries just like you do. I am fully caught up in that s*** storm that is adult life, like working in order to feed self and family, keeping shelter over my head, and I just generally do not have time to take over the Earth, nor would I know what to do with it once such a takeover was complete.
Comment
Comment by Royce Latham on February 21, 2013 at 8:09pm Cynthia
Not sure, but there was a do not disturb sign on his bedroom door.
Comment by Cynthia Catsman on February 21, 2013 at 4:28pm Obama could have an orgy in the Oval office and no one in DC would give a damn. He simply would be exercising an alternative lifestyle...Was Reggie visiting during Benghazi?
Comment by Royce Latham on February 21, 2013 at 3:10pm from:http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/02/benghazi-white-house-changes-stor...
White Houses Changes its Story on Benghazi...AGAIN
Posted by Gunner Panobscot
Written by Tim Brown @ freedomoutpost
Last Friday I wrote about how the White House had sent a letter to Congress that said that Barack Obama didn’t make one single phone call on the night of September 11, 2012 as the attacks on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi were taking place. Well just how the narrative on Benghazi has changed over and over with this administration, they have changed their story again. Now, White House Press Secretary Jay Carney said that Obama Called then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at approximately 10pm EST on the night of the Benghazi attacks.
CNS News reports,
That was more than six hours after the attacks started, more than an hour before Tryone Woods and Glen Doherty were killed–and about the time that Clinton first released a statement linking the attacks to “inflammatory material posted on the Internet,” a reference to an anti-Muslim video on YouTube.
“Like every president before him, he has a national security adviser and deputy national security adviser,” Carney told CNSNews.com on Tuesday. “He was in regular communication with his national security team directly, through them, and spoke with the secretary of state at approximately 10 p.m. He called her to get an update on the situation.”
Carney was responding to questions from CNSNews.com about who Obama communicated with on the evening of Sept. 11, 2012. Outgoing Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Gen. Martin Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs, told the Senate Armed Services Committee they first notified the president of the attack during a Sept. 11, 2012 meeting that began at 5 p.m. and ran for about 30 minutes. They also told the committee they did not talk to Obama or anyone else at the White House after that meeting.
The Washington Times made clear that, “The White House has said Mr. Obama was kept up to date on the attack by his staff, though after being alerted to the attack in a pre-scheduled afternoon meeting he never spoke again with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Martin E. Dempsey or then-Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton.”
It was on that night the Secretary Clinton released a statement on the attack in Benghazi in which she linked an anti-Muslim video as the cause of it. “Some have sought to justify this vicious behavior as a response to inflammatory material posted on the Internet,” Clinton said. “The United States deplores any intentional effort to denigrate the religious beliefs of others. Our commitment to religious tolerance goes back to the very beginning of our nation. But let me be clear: There is never any justification for violent acts of this kind.”
CNS confirmed with several news outlets, including the Associated Press, Reuters, and FactCheck.org, about the timing of their stories about Clinton’s statement. The stories hit the wire within the hour of Clinton’s statement being made public around 10pm.
I’m wondering how much longer the Senate Armed Services Committee is going to put up with the blatant lying of this White House and it’s administration before they have had enough. In fact, I’m wondering when the American people are going to seriously burn up the White House phone lines demanding an end to this nonsense and real accountability, responsibility and punishment for all involved in what is becoming more clearly understood to be a cover-up in which American citizens died.
Comment by Debrajoe Smith-Beatty on February 21, 2013 at 2:54pm Royce, point well taken, however, if we remove any of the Supreme Court Judges, Obama will appoint a new judge. Now that is a catch 22.
Comment by Royce Latham on February 21, 2013 at 2:53pm
Comment by Royce Latham on February 21, 2013 at 2:49pm Debrajoe
If you ignore that Obama is an illegal President, his extra-Constitutional actions, his destructive economic and social behaviors, his attacks on our Bill of Rights, his exploitation of mass murder, and his gutting and demoralizing of the military, make it clear that he is unfit to usurp the office of the President of the United States.
On a related note the Pope has resigned. Lignet has attributed this to a power play in the Vatican and specific problems with the Vatican Bank. I wouldn't want to start a conspiracy theory, but didn't John Roberts have a bank account with the Vatican Bank?
Comment by Royce Latham on February 21, 2013 at 2:32pm BB
Obama just came back from his secret vacation. Reggie Love came out of the plane after Obama. Michelle was vacationing elsewhere. So if Michelle is the first lady, what does that make Reggie? As far as letting Ambassador Stevens be raped and murdered, Obama was covering his tracks, because Stevens had been arming al-Qaeda since the beginning of our illegal foray into Libya. Or Stevens was doing someone that made the Resident jealous.
Comment by Debrajoe Smith-Beatty on February 21, 2013 at 2:04pm Impeach BH Obama. He has earned the distinction of Presidents who have been removed from public office for cause. He has violated the laws of the USA, he has
ignored the US Constitution and the Bill of Rights, he has demonstrated that he is a proficient liar and he has been on a 4.5 year spending spree, with tax-payers money.
BH Obama has interfered with the Fast and Furious investigations, Four Americans were killed in Benghazi, why is BH Obama still in office?
BH Obama and Michelle Obama are expensive welfare recipients. During the year 2011, the Obama’s cost the US tax payers 1.4 billion dollars. Michelle Obama, was not elected into public office by the voters of America. However, as of February, 2012, Michelle, a vacation junkie, has taken 16 vacations on tax payer money. Many will argue that she is the first lady of the USA. She does not act nor behave like a first lady. She has received world wide criticism for her behavior and her appearance. She freely tells American’s what and how to eat while she is the queen of gluttony. The high spending Obama’s act like welfare folks who hit the jack pot. The Obama’s are descended darkness upon the American nation.
Comment by Chuck Wingfield on February 21, 2013 at 2:03pm Don't know about conspiracies but do know a little about ballistics. Having been a deer hunter I've seen enough entry and exit wounds to know the difference. I also know that every projectile (bullet) shows some damage after it encounters an object, even soft targets. The Warren Commissions own document shows pictures of "THE KILLING" bullet that supposedly hit the President 1st then the hit and exited the Governor twice. It was totally unblemished just like a new one. Of course the most telling clues are that one of the Presidents entry wounds was in the front of his neck the other was the upper front right of his skull . The flight paths of the Presidents wounds appear to have originated from 2 locations. The neck wound looks like it came from a firing position in front and lower than the Presidents head and the 2nd came a few seconds after the first shot and came from a position in front and above. The Governors entry wound was from much higher and behind and the undamaged killing and wounding bullet on the floor of the car. It is what it is.
Comment by Billy Bowlegs on February 21, 2013 at 11:28am Royce;
Do you think maybe the foursome got killed in Benghazi when the White American Gay Ambassador turned down the Black President's advances? Kinda like "To hell with them, let them fend for themselves". Now that would be news even for the liberals.
© 2013 Created by Judson Phillips.

You need to be a member of Tea Party Nation to add comments!
Join Tea Party Nation