By Alan Caruba
Full disclosure: Years ago I received a small stipend from The Heartland Institute to help cover the costs of writing articles regarding the global warming hoax, well before it was exposed in 2009 when emails between its perpetrators—the UN’s Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change—revealed the total lack of real science involved. I have continued to expose the hoax without any support from Heartland or any other entity.
A total of six conferences on climate change have been sponsored by The Heartland Institute. I attended the first conference in New York City in 2008 and my initial observation was that virtually no one from the press was there and the meager coverage it received disparaged it.
This week, a major smear campaign against the Institute erupted as the result of an act of deception and thievery that may well result in criminal charges against its as yet unknown perpetrator.
The President of the Institute, Joe Bast, immediately informed its supporters, directors, donors and friends that someone pretending to be a board member had sent Heartland an email claiming to be a director and asking that documents regarding a January board meeting be re-sent.
A clever ruse, but the result was that elements of the confidential documents were then posted on a number of so-called climate blogs and from there to various members of the media who, with the exception of The Guardian, took no steps whatever to verify the authenticity of the documents, some of which Heartland says were either a concoction of lies or altered to convey inaccurate information.
The leading disseminator of the global warming hoax, The New York Times, published its version on Wednesday, February 15th, titled “Leak Offers Glimpse of Campaign Against Climate Science.”
Suffice to say, the “climate science” served up by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change has been a pack of lies from the day it first convened. Its “science” was based on computer models rigged by co-conspirators that include Michael Mann of Penn State University and Phil Jones of the University of East Anglia.
The original leak of their emails in November 2009 instantly revealed the extent of their efforts to spread the hoax and to suppress any expression of doubt regarding it. A second release in 2011 confirmed what anyone paying any attention already knew.
The “warmists”, a name applied to global warming hoaxers, launched into a paroxysm of denial that has not stopped to this day. Their respective universities have since engaged in every possible way to hide the documentation they claimed supported their claims. Suffice to say, the global warming hoax was the golden goose for everyone who received literally billions in public and private funding.
We have reached the point where the warmists have been claiming that global warming causes global cooling! Along the way the bogus warming has been blamed for thousands of utterly absurd events and trends. What really worried the perpetrators was the fact that the planet had entered a cooling cycle in 1998.
At the heart of the hoax was the claim that carbon dioxide (CO2) was causing the Earth to heat and that CO2 emissions must be reduced to save the Earth. Next to oxygen, CO2 is vital to all life on Earth as it sustains all vegetation which in turn sustains every creature that depends on it as a source of food. It represents a mere 0.033% of the Earth’s atmosphere and is referred to by warmists as a “greenhouse gas.” It is, as any meteorologist or climatologist will tell you, the atmosphere that protects the Earth from becoming a dissociated planet like Mars.
The New York Times article is a case study in bad journalism and bias on a scale for which this failing newspaper is renowned. The Times reported that “Leaked documents suggest that an organization known for attacking climate science is planning a new push to undermine the teaching of global warming in public schools, the latest indication that climate change is becoming part of the nation’s culture wars.”
Wrong, so wrong. Polls have demonstrated that global warming is last on a list of concerns by the public. It barely registers because the public has concluded that it is either a hoax or just not happening. Teaching global warming in the nation’s schools constitutes a crime against the truth and the students.
The Times article makes much of the amounts some donors to Heartland have contributed, but in each cited case, with one exception, the donations had nothing to do with its rebuttal of global warming science.
“It is in fact not a scientific controversy”, said the Times article. “The majority of climate scientists say that emissions generated by human beings are changing the climate and putting the planet at long-term risk, although they are uncertain about the exact magnitude of that risk.”
The exact magnitude is zero. Thousands of scientists have signed petitions denouncing global warming as a hoax. The Times lies.
A post at The Daily Bayonet on February 14th said it well, “What the Heartland documents show is how badly warmists have been beaten by those with a fraction of the resources they’ve enjoyed. Al Gore spent $300 million advertising the global warming hoax. Greenpeace, the WWF (World Wildlife Fund), the Sierra Club, the National Resources Defense Council, NASA, NOAA, the UN and nation states have collectively poured billions into climate research, alternative energies, and propaganda, supported along the way by most of the broadcast and print media.
The Times will continue to publish lies about global warming, as will others like Time and Newsweek magazines. The attacks on Heartland and the many scientists and others like myself who debunk this fraud will continue, but their efforts are just the dying gasp of the greatest hoax of the modern era.
There’s a reason the theme of Heartland’s sixth conference in 2011 was “Restoring the Scientific Method.” Real science does not depend on declaring “a consensus” before the hypothesis has been thoroughly tested, a process that often involves years of effort. Meanwhile, the planet continues to cool.
© Alan Caruba, 2012
Comment
Comment by Ron Boyer on February 17, 2012 at 5:09am When people live their lives in fear they will believe anything and that is just what the government wants. People are gutless and what to be SAFE and SECURE and do it with no effort on their own part. So in steps the government and no matter what lies they are told they will believe it if they are told it will make them SAFE and SECURE.
I've noticed that so many of the "findings" from the left, whether scientific, economic, etc., are based on the assumption of a static model. They present a snapshot on which to build their case, completely disregarding the fact that any system is in constant motion.
For example, they fail to mention that the previously mentioned flourocarbons, while noxious in concentration, quickly break down into fairly harmless components when released in the atmosphere, especially if exposed to sunlight. In the realm of economics they base redistribution arguments on the assumption there is only so much wealth to go around, never admitting that new wealth can be generated through personal industry.
They bombard us with these specious arguments knowing that very few will notice the fallacies or, if they do they don't have the platform (no MSM for us!) from which to refute them effectively. So while we're left fuming, they're laughing. And spending our money!
Comment by Morry Markovitz on February 16, 2012 at 11:14pm Let's keep reminding people that Al Gore is a 5-star congenital liar with the Global Warming hoax being his Major Lifetime Lying Project, and that he flunked out of Harvard's Divinity School (the easiest course to pass, and the one requiring perhaps the least acquaintance with matters scientific of any course one could possibly select -- and Al flunked it); Al then tried a small Divinity college where he dropped out before his flunking grades could be posted once again; Al's support for numerous environmental hoaxes has made him the de facto though not de jure accessory to the murder of millions of the most vulnerable human beings on the planet, the poor and malnourished of the third world, whom Al Gore has made a fortune from, while they pay with their lives. All this is demonstrable -- despite its appearance in black and white here and in many other places, Gore will not sue for defamation of character, because the truth is a defense against such a suit, so it would only serve to prove to the world the truth about Gore's subhuman, sub-animal character. He's about as valuable to the planet as a single e coli organism -- ie, all life on earth will benefit when Al Gore becomes extinct.
Mr. Caruba,
Thank you for this glimpse into the scientific community. The left has been trying to trick the public for years with arcane "scientific findings."
I was in high school in the 60s when the big scare was that the flouro-carbons in aerosols were eating a hole in the ozone layer. We were all going to be burned to a crisp without the ozone layer to protect us from UV rays. My thought was I'll believe it when I see it. I haven't seen it yet!
Comment by Charles F Nichols on February 16, 2012 at 5:48pm Despite my best attempts at explaining to people that man kinds existence on this planet is merely a part of its natural evolution,the global warming \climate change rolls on. So now I choose a little different path. So when a noble peace prize winner top scientist resigns from one of the main scientific institutions because he says there is no evidence the earths temperature is increasing. CASE CLOSED. THE EARTH IS NOT WARMING DUE TO OUR ACTIVITY. IF IT IS. IT WOULD BE DUE TO THE EARTHS GREATEST CONTRIBUTOR TO HEAT AND THAT WOULD BE SOLAR ACTIVITY.
Comment by Linda Sills on February 16, 2012 at 5:31pm Awesome Alan. I am on a task force here in San Diego to fight against Agenda 21 and ICLEI, et al. Thanks for what you are doing as well.
Comment by Gary L Hastriter on February 16, 2012 at 4:04pm Alan: I wonder how much Al Gore made above his $300 million invested in advertising.
I understand his energy use in his home would pay for the energy used in many normal homes.
Comment by John S Bacsenko IV on February 16, 2012 at 4:02pm Two things......it is a obviously a natural progression that alternate means of power needs research.....not for the sake of 'arm-chair scientists', the proclaimed 'warmists', but simple growth and advancement. Thank you Alan for the article. It is not my intention to be-little your blog, but I can't help but add that if methane produced as a human by-product could be shaped into a 'cash-cow' for leftist-thinking money-grabbers to legislate....they would certainly study and propose mandatory, government issued corks for where the sun don't shine! Sorry to be gross and infantile, but the analogy may be spot on considering current liberal proposals!
Great article revealing the truth about so-called global warming. However, I disagree that this is the "greatest hoax of the modern era". I reserve that designation for the notion that Barack Obama was ever Constitutionally qualified to be elected as President of the United States.
© 2013 Created by Judson Phillips.
You need to be a member of Tea Party Nation to add comments!
Join Tea Party Nation