Comment
Comment by Tim Nerenz on October 3, 2011 at 7:22am 
Comment by Morry Markovitz on October 3, 2011 at 4:59am SORRY but this is part THREE.
My post keeps getting cut off. You'll have to read this post and the 2 following it in reverse order. My apologies. I hope you find the unique perspective of interest, and of use in devastating liberals. Here's the finale:
---------------------------
You're not a "noble savage" but you are a savage, and a pretty darned moronic one at that.
OK, down to brass tacks now:
You, sir or madam, are an advocate against humanity, human intelligence, and everything man has accomplished in rising above the law of the jungle. You are a throwback, not of a century or even a milennium, but a throwback by eons and ages. You see someone who has what you want, or what someone you like wants, and your moral idea -- MORAL, I emphasize -- for obtaining it is ... just seize it -- like an animal would or like a human infant would try to do. You want to re-introduce the law of the jungle back into civilization, which was created to escape that very law of the jungle. You want us to regress back to even further than the operating moral code of a human child. You want men to adopt the moral principles governing the behavior of human infants and of wild jungle beasts. You want to legalize, to incorporate into the laws of OUR HUMAN civilization, provisions which will enable the moral philosophy of "gimme" to be exercised and enforced by law. You want to live in OUR HUMAN civilization, but demand that you be allowed to behave like an animal. And worse: And coward that you are, you want to use OUR LEGAL SYSTEM to force SOMEONE ELSE to use THEIR fangs to do your dirty work for you so you won't have to see yourself as the barbaric savage you actually are. You want to swing open our doors to the jungle, and welcome it back in to destroy the civilization that HUMAN BEINGS have created.
Do you really dare to think of yourself as human?
Oh, that's right, I guess you do. For a moment there I forgot how stupid you are.
Comment by Morry Markovitz on October 3, 2011 at 4:50am DARN. The last part of my post was cut off again. Here's the end, to finish up my partial post just below. Read the below part first, then come back here for the end.
A newborn human infant operates on the law of the jungle too. When he sees what he wants, he reaches for it and if nothing interferes to stop him he takes it. Just like an animal. Just like a liberal/regressive. He is not yet a full human being, just like a liberal/regressive. He still has all his non-human animal attributes, but has yet to develop his uniquely HUMAN ANIMAL behaviors, knowledge, and ideas. Just like a liberal/regressive. He has yet to develop his human MIND. Indeed, also like a liberal/regressive, an infant's mind hasn't yet progressed to the fully HUMAN level. Someday it will, assuming he doesn't have liberal/regressive parents.
HUMAN parents teach their infant how much better it is FOR HIM,HIMSELF and for EVERYONE around him who are his potential friends and assets, if he can develop the ability to see beyond the range of the immediate "now" moment in which other animals perpetually live, and look into the future, long range, and THINK, and plan for improving his lot and the welfare of everyone in society simultaneously,rather than stagnating at the level of an animal who lives today in the same way and at the same level as he did 10,000 years ago -- and who will remain there eternally. We teach our infants how to PROGRESS steadily by understanding the relationship of the present to the future, and that it is often in a HUMAN being's own best interest to give up or "trade" a current need or want for much greater rewards tomorrow and next month and next year. And that to be able to live in such a world of hope, ever increasing knowledge, ever-lengthening lifespan, ever-improving health, and ever improving conditions of every stripe, he must respect the full rights of others who share those goals, he must regard them not as objects which may be holding something he wants now, but as equals to himself, with the same human rights,which he must respect if he expects them to respect his under a moral code which would never work for animals, but which is the ONLY code that will work for a HUMAN BEING if he chooses to be a full human being, to actualize his potential, and to rise above the reflexive, instinctual "gimme NOW" level of a jungle beast or a newborn human infant or a liberal/regressive.
It is PROFOUNDLY IRONIC that those who call themselves "progressive" advocate a MORAL philosophy what amounts to a monstrous REGRESSION, demanding that we return to the morality NOT of a human adolescent or even a human child, but to the morality and ethics of a beast in the jungle. It is anti-human, it is anti-civilization, it is anti-HUMANE, it is anti-INTELLECT, it is anti-MIND it is anti-LIFE and it is anti-PEACEFUL HUMAN CIVILIZATION WITH MUTUAL RESPECT AMONGST ALL GENUINELY CIVILIZED INDIVIDUALS, who prefer the UNIQUELY HUMAN laws of civilization to the law of the jungle. And need I add: it is ANTI-PROGRESS. It is in fact, a regression all the way back to the beginnings, the absolutely most extremely regressive idea anyone could possibly conceive. Back to the time BEFORE human beings even arrived on this earth. Back to total chaos, and LITERAL "dog eat dog." That's the incredible irony of its advocates calling themselves "progressives." It would be hilarious if it weren't so stupid, and so frightening that people with advanced college degrees can be so abjectly ignorant, and so incredibly STUPID. Come to think of it, the stupidity part of it actually is believable. Isn't it obvious what a necessity abject stupidity is for someone to advocate seriously the savage ethics of thejungle as the ideal moral and practical base for human civilization? C'mon, Mr. Liberal/Regressive, admit it. You're not a "noble savage"
Comment by Morry Markovitz on October 3, 2011 at 4:42am Here's my response to the liberal/regressive:
Your "tax the rich" idea and the idea of redistributing wealth is so intellectually brilliant you can actually boil it down to one single word without losing its full essence. That word is: "Gimme."
You want it, you think you need it, there it is in someone else's possession, so just take it. Just "gimme." You want, I have, so you feel you have some kind of moral right just to take it from me. I have 5 potatoes, you have one, so just grab a couple of mine. Wonderful moral idea. An absolutely brilliant and creative solution to not having something you want. Worthy of an Einstein. What a brain you liberal/regressives have to have to think of such a complex solution for yourself.
No wonder you have only 1 potato. You've gotta be a moron to call a philosophy that belongs in the prehistoric jungle, and which comes straight from the jungle, "progressive."
See anything you need anywhere in someone's hands or garage or pocket? Take it. WOW, what a creative leap. What an admirable moral system must underlie that idea. It's probably so complex we've just gotta interview the many thousands of experienced experts who have lived by that rule and now occupy the prison system. It amounts to legalizing crime, the crime of theft, which all progressives clearly respect as a lovable and moral trait in a wise and admirable human being like their very barbaric selves. You think you have a right to a lifetime of complete and total care. Well, OK. How about this: we'll set up a nice clean prison cell for you, too. That was a joke. I know you really don't want to spend your life in a cell. So I understand why you advocate LEGALIZING your criminal activities.
When an animal wants something, it takes it. When a tiger is hungry, if he sees a litter of squirrel pups he eats them alive. If he sees a lion cub eating part of a recent kill, he takes it from the cub. It's called the law of the jungle. IT IS IN ORDER TO BANISH THAT LAW FROM HIS LIFE THAT MAN CREATED CIVILIZATION. A lone Tarzan in the jungle would have to live by that law too.
But we do NOT live in the jungle. We live together in man-made, man-created groups. And these places are NOT just collections of bricks and wood, but the result of ideas, of laws, of moral principles that men agree to live by in order to graduate from the jungle to the benefits of civilization, and in order to realize their highest potential as human beings in peace, without the threat of being eaten by a wild animal or otherwise destroyed by some inhuman liberal/regressive jungle animal like you. We acknowledge the rights of all men, regardless of their brute muscle power and we do the uniquely MAN thing, we live according to our IDEAS of what is right and wrong for ALL of us as human beings. We RESPECT each others' existence and rights. We develop detailed, rigorous thinking into documents like a Constitution. We don't live by "take, and ye shall receive." We don't live by the law of the jungle. We chose to rise above that, we escaped from it, because . . . we are HUMAN beings and the last thing we need is to drag back into our magnificent creation -- civilization -- the very thing we sought to banish when we created civilization: being subjected to the jungle's moral code of "Gimme."
If you don't like our system, go back to the jungle where your morality will fit right in. Then you can relax and be comfy in your own kind of world. You won't be "a stranger and afraid in a world you never made," or be constantly reminded of your inferior animalistic nature by all those superior HUMANS around you who know how to deal with reality better than an animal like you does.
A newborn human infant operates on the law of
Comment by USARogue on October 2, 2011 at 12:02am
The biggest deception is that the Liberal Progressives want tax rates increased. This is just the delusion they want us to believe.
Liberal Progressives don't care what the tax rates are. What they do care about is the fact that after you pay your taxes, even if they are raised, you have more money left over than they do. You see, the truth behind social and economic justice has nothing to do with fairness. It's all about equality. They want everyone to be equal. Equal opportunity didn't work as well as they wanted so now they need a new way to equalize or level the playing field.
It doesn't matter to them if you work harder, took risks with your idea, time, money and life, they feel you owe them more and more. If you make 2X the amount of money they do you should pay an amount of taxes so you have what they have left after they pay their taxes. Or, as is the case with most Liberal Progressives, don't pay taxes at all.
This is what the elitists from the hallowed halls of intelligentsia tell them, so it must be right. The Barrack Obama's of the world tested their hypothesis in the teacher's lounge at Harvard. All the other professor's agreed with him in his socialist Liberal Progressive utopia so it must be plausible even though it has never worked before. These elitists are the ones who have read many books on the subject so they know better how things in life work than we do. If they wrote a book they're revered even more as an authority. None of them ever created a business or created any commerce, but they read a book on how to do it. None of them ever worked 16 hours a day and worried themselves to sleep about their business, but they read a book about it.
This is why they can run the country into the ground and the lemmings will still follow them.
This is the delusion of the Liberal mind.
Comment by Ray Marks on September 29, 2011 at 6:25am Comment by Chris Bee on September 28, 2011 at 9:49pm I will be bit boring but do not forget all these people in healthcare (which I am best familiar with) who are contributing nothing to patient care, yet draw very nice salaries. Just in case you are wondering why is healthcare so expensive and it's cost so hard to control.
No, adding more penpushers, as suggested by obumacare, would not help.
So many problems, so little time, so few truly smart executives.
Can we save Titanic?
Comment by Victoria Knox on September 27, 2011 at 12:03pm Comment by Dana Lynn Agnew on September 26, 2011 at 3:57pm Comment by Doug Nicholson on September 26, 2011 at 3:45pm © 2013 Created by Judson Phillips.
You need to be a member of Tea Party Nation to add comments!
Join Tea Party Nation