Work From Home

Red Ink Flowing::Al-Qaeda's Man of The Year

Like most political organizations, Al-Qaeda has different factions in its ranks. One of the issues that separates its members in recent times is the issue of “The Al-Qaeda Man of the Year”.  

The more conservative factions - the right wingers - are totally against the idea because they feel that the very idea is blasphemy against The Profit Mohamed. The more liberal  - the progressive - factions believe that having a Man of The Year would show how modern and progressive Al-Qaeda really is and would enhance the effectiveness of their evangelical efforts. 

The success, notoriety and ultimate martyrdom of their founder, Osama bin Laden , gave strength to the arguments of the Al-Qaeda progressives. It was that martyrdom thing that put the damper on the argument for a period of time.

The recent near miraculous successes of their brother organization, The Muslim Brotherhood, has rekindled the arguments with considerably less resistance to the idea of an “Al-Qaeda Man of The Year”.

I know that it is easy to confuse Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood because westerners do not understand the finer points. In very simplistic terms, Al-Qaeda is a religious organization with political aspirations; committed to holy war as a means of achieving universal subjugation of all free men whereas The Muslim Brotherhood is a political organization that uses religious doctrine in a holy war as a means of achieving universal subjugation of all free men. I hope this clears things up for you.

When we understand that The Muslim Brotherhood has been in existence as a political organization since 1928 and remained unknown to the western world until recent times. In a remarkably short period of time, the Muslim Brotherhood has risen from a minor footnote on the political landscape in the Middle East to a world force encompassing ten countries in East Asia, seven countries in Africa, and four other major countries to include both Russia and the United States. The last time the world saw such a meteoric rise to prominence was the Rise of The Third Reich - Nazi Germany under Adolph Hitler. And some might argue that Nazi Germany’s treatment of European Jews was much more kind and humane than the treatment of all those who oppose the Al-Qaeda and the Muslim Brotherhood - to include other Muslims.

So what put such wind in their sails after more than three quarters of a century of anonymity?

If one were to examine the time line of events it is quite obvious as to how this resurrection of Satan’s minions occurred and why there is such outpouring of support for “Al-Qaeda’s Man of The Year”.

In 2011 after eight years of misguided combat, the United States pulled out of Iraq.

In 2011 after eighty plus years of relative anonymity the then outlawed Muslim Brotherhood was legitimized in Egypt when our strongest ally in the middle East, Hosni Mubarak, was ousted by the Muslim Brotherhood. 

In 2012, the United States sent the Muslim Brotherhood $450,000,000 in American Tax Dollars. It has been reported that from the initial American incursion into Iraq, captured arms and ammunition were being exported to the Muslim Brotherhood throughout the Middle East by the trainload. 

In 2013, working with the Muslim Brotherhood, the black flag of Al-Qaeda was raised over two of the three major cities in Iraq.

In 2013, the Egyptian military removed the Muslim Brotherhood stooge, Mohamed Morsi, the Egyptian Constitution was restored and the Muslim Brotherhood was declared a terrorist organization in the nation of its birth.

In 2014, Barack Obama publicly refused to back the position of the Egyptian military and stood fast with his soul brothers, the Muslim Brotherhood - thus earning him the much envied title of “Al-Qaeda’s 2014 Man of The Year”.

Views: 534

Tags: #Al-Qaeda, #MuslimBrotherhood, #Obama, #redinkflowing, #terrorism

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Nation to add comments!

Join Tea Party Nation

Comment by Dennis L. Kolb Sr. on January 10, 2014 at 3:07am

Allen West; "The Obama Administration Is Indeed Aiding, Enabling, and Abetting Our Radical Islamic Jihadists"

http://allenwestrepublic.com/2013/05/01/allen-west-the-obama-admini...

by Allen West............................ Published on May 1st, 2013 | by Allen West Republic ..........

“What kind of country have we become when we allow Islamic organizations with ties to the Muslim Brotherhood to ruin the career of an Army officer with 6 combat deployments, decorated for Valor? The fact that these groups went to now CIA Director John Brennan with their complaint when he was our counter-terrorism adviser warrants investigation. We are giving domestic Islamic jihadists welfare. We cease interrogations of domestic Islamic jihadists to read them Miranda rights. We are calling treasonous domestic Islamic jihadists perpetrators of “workplace violence.” The Attorney General is lecturing Americans about reprisals. Enough! I believe this Obama administration is indeed aiding, enabling, and abetting our enemy, radical Islamic jihadists. The evidence is certainly mounting and I am sick of the progressive socialists who just want to excuse this away and try to silence us as “Islamophobes.” You progressives are all complicit in this as well! I want Lt. Col. Dooley back on the list for consideration of Battalion Command, anyone not agreeing is in the camp of the enemy. Read and share this article. Call and write the Secretary of the Army, Chief of Staff of the Army, Secretary of Defense, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, and President Obama…ask them whose doggone side are they on?”

Suggested reading by Allen West – Washington Times article by:  Rowan Scarborough

Top brass crush career of Army officer who warned of jihadists

Comment by Dennis L. Kolb Sr. on January 10, 2014 at 2:56am

July 12,2011............... "Aiding and Abetting the Enemy"................ By Lauri B. Regan  ......

         http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/07/aiding_and_abetting_the_enem...

This past week, the Obama administration informed Congress that it had approved the sale of 125 M1A1 Abrams Tanks to the government of Egypt. The question of just who is running the government of Egypt was apparently insignificant to the decision-makers. And this goes to the heart of the problem, as this administration continually makes irrational and dangerous foreign policy decisions that may not only have a dramatic affect on the Mideast and surrounding areas, but that will likely impact U.S. interests across the globe.

What will likely go down in history as the first of Obama's "Carter moments," was his decision to abandon America's long-standing friend, Hosni Mubarak.  While the Left loves to argue that Obama is just following the Bush doctrine by supporting democracy, that rationale ignores the importance of the U.S. government pursuing its national security interests.  Abandoning a long-standing ally in exchange for a government comprised of the Muslim Brotherhood is not a positive development for the U.S.  Notwithstanding Mubarak's internal policies, Egypt honored a peace agreement with Israel, kept the Muslim Brotherhood's terrorist endeavors at bay, maintained the unimpaired flow of natural gas through the pipeline to Israel and Jordan, and policed its Gaza border to help prevent the shipment of weapons to Hamas.

Throwing Mubarak under the bus without any long-term plan or influence over the formation of the future government was far from a strategic policy decision. However, it is consistent with a US President who has been reaching out to Islamic fundamentalists since entering office. As Robert Spencer recently noted:

"The Muslim Brotherhood, contrary to 'intelligence' chief James Clapper's ridiculous claim that it is 'largely secular,' is dedicated to establishing an Islamic state in Egypt and implementing the Islamic law that has no room for democratic principles, uses violence against dissenters and miscreants, and tramples upon minority rights and women's rights...

"The spiritual father of the Muslim Brotherhood, the 84-year-old Sheikh Yusuf al-Qaradawi, recently returned to Cairo to be greeted by huge and rapturous crowds after the end of his fifty-year exile from the country. In January 2009, during a Friday sermon broadcast on Al-Jazeera, he prayed that Allah would kill all the Jews: 'Oh Allah, take this oppressive, Jewish, Zionist band of people. Oh Allah, do not spare a single one of them. Oh Allah, count their numbers, and kill them, down to the very last one.'"

Furthermore, the state of affairs in Egypt is completely in disarray. The protests in Tahrir Square are far from over with anti-government demonstrations continuing. It would make more sense to hold off any weapons sales to an Egyptian government until the completion of upcoming elections when the State Department and National Security Agency can best analyze whether Egypt will continue pursuing peaceful relations with the U.S. and its

allies in the region or whether it is heading down the path of Khomeinist Iran,

Egypt is not the only country in the region receiving U.S. military aid.  Omri Ceren disclosed the use by Lebanese Armed Forces of U.S.-provided M16's and armored personnel carriers against the Israel Defense Forces in on-going border disputes.  Notwithstanding the arguments of pro-Palestinian activists who vilify the IDF, Israel is the only reliable U.S. ally in the region, while Iranian-controlled Lebanon is far from reliable.  Furthermore, southern Lebanon is completely controlled by Hezb'allah notwithstanding the failed efforts of UNIFIL. This brings us back to Iran and one more potential Carter moment for Obama as he bargains away Israel's defensive borders at the expense of providing further means for her enemies to attack.

John Bolton pointed out earlier this year, "[t]he fall of Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri's government, replaced by a Hezbollah-dominated coalition, dramatically imperils Beirut's democratic Cedar Revolution." Logic dictates that not only must Washington "withhold recognition from any Lebanese government that relies on Hezbollah support," it must withhold all military support of the LAF and UNIFIL until that country stabilizes and proves its peaceful bona-fides.

Similarly, the U.S. has been providing on-going funding and military training to the Palestinian Authority's security forces. Caroline Glick reported two years ago that,

"At a recent lecture in Washington, US Lt.-Gen. Keith Dayton, who is responsible for training Palestinian military forces in Jordan, indicated that if Israel does not surrender Judea and Samaria within two years, the Palestinian forces he and his fellow American officers are now training at a cost of more than $300 million could begin killing Israelis...Dayton's statement laid bare the disturbing fact even though the administration is fully aware of the costs of its approach to the Palestinian conflict with Israel, it is still unwilling to reconsider it."

Sadly, Dayton's prediction proved correct when in April of this year, a Palestinian Authority policeman gunned down an Israeli worshipper at Joseph's Tomb in Nablus.  Furthermore, two members of the PA security forces were arrested in connection with the Itamar massacre in which five members of the Fogel family were brutally murdered.

Israeli MK Danny Danon called on the U.S. to reconsider its funding and training of PA security forces stating that, "[a]s a true friend of Israel, we expect that the objective of this training would be to ensure Israeli security and not to kill its citizens."  In the meantime, the Palestinian governing entities of Fatah and Hamas have entered into negotiations for a reconciliation of the two governments -- a step that has since encountered road blocks (as opposed to the Road Map for Peace completely being ignored by the Obama administration). One shudders to imagine a union of U.S. trained forces and Hamas militants governing a future Palestinian state living side by side with the Jews they have vowed to annihilate.

Damascus provides another example of Obama's blind eye to abject terror while, on bended knee, he props up terrorist regimes dedicated to the destruction of western values and the annihilation of Israel.  Early Monday, hundreds of Syrian government supporters attacked the U.S. Embassy in Damascus hanging signs cursing America and stating, "The people want to kick out the dog."

 

President Bush withdrew the Syrian ambassador in 2005 and it was only when Obama began his ill-sought hopes and dreams of peace with the Muslim world (and the Islamic fanatics either controlling or seeking to control so many of its unstable nations in the Mideast and Northern Africa) that he returned a U.S. representative to that country by means of a recess appointment due to lack of Senate approval. As Representative Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, chairwoman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee noted at the time, 

"Using this Congressional recess to make an appointment that has far-reaching policy implications despite Congressional objections and concerns is regrettable...Making underserved concessions to Syria tells the regime in Damascus that it can continue to pursue its dangerous agenda and not face any consequences from the US...That is the wrong message to be sending to a regime which continues to harm and threaten US interests and those of such critical allies as Israel."

The Jerusalem Post further reported the observation of David Schenker of the Washington Institute for Near East Policy that "the decision to return an ambassador to Damascus showed that the Obama administration hadn't decided to change its engagement policy with Syria despite its role in transferring serious weaponry to Hizbullah and its unwillingness to comply with the UN's International Atomic Energy Agency about its suspected nuclear site."

This once again brings us back to Iran and the hard to ignore visions of the Iranian hostage crisis that began in 1979 under Carter's watch.  It is difficult to imagine that the various Mideast "experts" in the Obama administration do not have similar images as they learn the news of the attacks in Damascas.  

Unfortunately, those with whom the real power lays have vastly distorted views of the world and make decisions that defy reason. The lack of rational judgment and informed assessment is leading our country and our allies down a path of assured destruction. Obama's replacement of strong leadership with a policy of leading from behind is destroying the pax American that helped maintain stability in the Mideast. But it is his aiding and abetting of U.S. enemies and his continued supplying of assistance and weaponry to hopeful hegemons that will most assuredly be used against friend and foe alike. This course, so reminiscent of the Carter failures, must be altered before the damage is irreversible and the Mideast is consumed by the fiery hatred of multiple Islamic republics.

"We're giving out weapons to inevitably enemy regimes, and we're doing it even as those weapons are already being turned against our allies"  - Omri Ceren, in his Mere Rhetoric blog, August 7, 2010

Comment by Dennis L. Kolb Sr. on January 10, 2014 at 2:41am

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Aiding+the+Enemy+Acts

Aiding the Enemy Acts

The outbreak of war normally ends all forms of normal relations between belligerent states. In support of the war effort municipal laws may be implemented to prevent citizens and other persons within a belligerent state's jurisdiction from assisting an enemy state through trade or other forms of contact. In the United States, for example, the Trading with the Enemy Act (40 Stat. 411 as amended [1917]) suspends all forms of trade or communication with persons in enemy territory. The statutory or executive restrictions imposed under the Trading with the Enemy Act are limited to formal periods of war, although other authority exists permitting the president to impose restrictions on trade or communications with a country without a declaration of war.

Because the Trading with the Enemy Act and similar statutes apply specifically to other nations in times of war, their provisions do not apply easily to dealings between citizens of the United States and members of terrorist organizations. After the September 11th Attacks were perpetrated by terrorist organizations against the United States, Congress enacted the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (usa patriot act) (Pub. L. No. 107-56, 115 Stat. 277) in order to strengthen the ability of the United States to protect itself from terrorist activities. The USA Patriot Act amended the existing statutory provisions permitting the president to restrict transactions and other transfers with foreign countries, organizations, and persons in order to respond to unusual and extraordinary threats against the United States.

The current statutory provisions allowing the president to impose economic sanctions against a nation that the president deems to be a threat against the United States are provided by the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), Pub. L. No. 95-223, 91 Stat. 1626 (50 U.S.C.A. §§ 1701-1702). Under this act, the president may, with respect to any person or property subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, investigate, regulate, or prohibit transactions in foreign exchange; transfers of credit or payments by or to any banking institute; or importation or exportation of Securities or currency. The president and the federal government may also confiscate property owned by certain foreign countries, organizations, or nationals.

Violation of an Executive Order issued pursuant to the IEEPA prohibiting trade with a foreign nation or organization may result in criminal sanctions. During the Gulf War in 1991, President George Herbert Walker Bush issued an executive order prohibiting citizens of the United States from traveling to or dealing with the government of Iraq. Arch Trading Company, Inc., a corporation based in Virginia, violated this decree by completing a contract with Iraq. The U.S. government brought criminal charges against the company for conspiring to commit an offense against the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C.A. § 371 (2000). Despite arguments by the company that violation of the order was not an "offense" under federal law, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit held that the company could be properly charged. United States v. Arch Trading Co., 987 F.2d 1087 (4th Cir. 1993).

Comment by Dennis L. Kolb Sr. on January 10, 2014 at 2:28am

Political Cartoons by Robert Ariail

Comment by Phil McConathy on January 9, 2014 at 6:39pm

Obama is much more a Muslim than a true American. America is extremely close to implosion from within.

Comment by frank miller on January 9, 2014 at 6:36pm

THE LID IS ABOUT TO BLOW !!!!

LOCK & LOAD !!!

OLD SARGE,'NAM VET,'68,'70

LRRP/ABN

Comment by Kristin Fecteau on January 9, 2014 at 5:41pm

I wonder if that last paragraph is supposed to be "2013" and not "2014"

Comment by Russell Edmund Fowler on January 9, 2014 at 1:44pm

Obama supporter don't want to hear or know any of this. They want to help Obama love the Muslim.

Comment by Norman Zink on January 9, 2014 at 1:16pm

Obama is Al-Qaeda's Man of the year!

Comment by Debrajoe Smith-Beatty on January 9, 2014 at 12:51pm

Obama loves his  fellow Muslims.

Tea Party Nation is a social network



The Instant Survivalist

Young Living Essential Oils

 






© 2014   Created by Judson Phillips.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service