OK, what about 2016, if we're still a nation by then?

Imagine for a moment, that we're such a strong nation that even Obama and the Democrat-Socialists can't divide and destroy us by 2016. And we need a President who can put us back together from the havoc, by then.

Between her "health issues" and Benghazi, it's hard to say if Hillary will have anything left by 2016. If she was the Hillary of four years ago, I'd say she had a great chance. She just didn't realize that the Marxist Messiah would appear, in all his glory.

But now, will even the Progressive Socialist-controlled media be able to whitewash her and give her a fresh new coating of teflon by then? Seems some of the Comrades at Pravda don't think so.

http://english.pravda.ru/world/americas/26-12-2012/123311-hillary_c...

Pravda has been amazing lately, almost as if some Russians appreciate freedom more than half of us Americans. But then they support nations like Iran ( Aryan ) and blow it.

But it is time for a woman President, and at least the Democrat-Socialists will say so. If they don't have Hillary, who else they got?

So what about rolling with the times?

Hypothetically, if I was personally asked to pick someone to run against Hillary ( or equivalent - would they dare pick "Gunban" Dianne Feinstein?! <GAG> ) in 2016, I'd think "Deneen Borelli".

Firstly she's for liberty, secondly she's for fiscal sanity and knows what it is and how to get it. I'm imagining she might pick Rand Paul as a running mate, to reinforce that.

All Hillary would have, that Deneen wouldn't have, is massive foreign policy experience...and having gotten at least four people killed ( That we know of! Remember, there was talk years ago, about a friend of the Clintons dying suspiciously! ) and lied about it and covered it up afterwards. Great references. But you can be sure the Marxist media would forget about the last part by then and gloss it over. Hill's just golden! ( Would they make her blond? )

Deneen is also a great speaker, I've heard her. Very fired up and passionate about what she believes in, which is mentioned above. She has her act clearly together.

And last but sadly not least, yes, she's a woman and a black woman. Those things shouldn't matter in a post-Martin Luther King society where we're all supposed to judge people by the content of their character, but sadly "President Mordred" tore that all apart with his class and racial divisiveness and warfare. He does so much remind me of the Arthurian "Mordred" character! Get all the knights of the Round Table fighting each other, tear the kingdom apart!

An Arthurian period movie called "Mordred", starring Obama in the lead role, would be 100% believable!  Oh how evil he could be! And he'd be playing himself! ( Perhaps after 2016 - get Scorcese on the phone! )

But what about the real deal this time, not just someone who the Progressive Republicrats will like, like Romney? That worked out so well. Voters had to ask themselves exactly how different he was from Obama, couldn't answer that question all that well, so they stuck with the Marxist Messiah.

And perhaps if Deneen isn't interested, then how about Senator Rand Paul or perhaps Marco Rubio, both of which I love, and will be seasoned in Congress by then and up to the leadership task. Or perhaps one of them and Deneen?

I'm just running some things up the flagpole to see who salutes, here.

What do you think?