For Everyone who knows a somewhat liberal H.S. Girl

Jack E. Kemp

In the 1970s, advocates of the Equal Rights Amendment famously said, "It's not going to lead to gay marriage." That was then. This is now.

For all you parents and grandparents, etc., who have or know a liberal high school girl who it all for transgender rights, you might want to tell them this story about what transgendered youth think of their rights - and what an all powerful state thinks of their and their parents' rights.

Today I received a letter from the Pacific Justice Institute concerning Florence (Colorado) High School where the administration is allowing a biological boy who thinks he is a girl to use the girl's locker room and toilets. This story is also confirmed after an internet search on "Florence Colorado High School Transgender." You will a find confirming article at

And you will find this story excerpted below:

Female students at Florence High School in Colorado have claimed that they were harassed by a transgender male student, who thanks to Colorado's anti-discrimination stance against "transgendered" students, has access to female facilities. But the story gets even more twisted because the girls were threatened with hate crime charges if they spoke up. Leftist outlets have tried to debunk the story as nothing but Christian "transphobia." This in itself proves the story is true.

So how many teenage girls - and their parents, even if they voted for Obama - are looking forward to having a naked boy in their high school locker room as they dress and undress? I bet not too many.

The letter I got from the Pacific Justice Institute goes on to say:

Last fall, parents at Florence High School were horrified to hear that the school was allowing a boy to use the girls' bathrooms and locker rooms. Then, when they were erroneously told by administrators that the transgender student's rights trumped the privacy rights of their daughters, their concern turned to shocking disbelief.

...And, to make matters worse, threats were hurled toward our clients' girls simply because they voiced concerns about having their privacy outrageously violated.

Specifically, there were threats by the athletic department against some of the girls' continued participation in school sports after they asserted their rights not to undress in front of this boy. Even more troubling was the Superintendent's warning that the complaining families are now subject to having their social media monitored by the police!

...We recognize that there are those who sincerely struggle with identifying with their natural gender - and we're sympathetic to their psychological challenges - but it doesn't change the fact of their biological sex.


The letter goes on to say the organization is fighting this violation of the girl's privacy (for any liberals reading this, let me clarify my language: this violation of the XX chromosome born female girls' privacy). And then goes on to state that this is a spreading trend in various school systems across the U.S. They are talking about everywhere, not just Los Angeles or Denver or other big cities.

But as some liberal who isn't familiar with this and other similar cases might say, it's not as if there will be boys undressing in the girls' locker room. And they would be wrong, lost in their delusions of a utopian and/or infantile nature. I wonder how many of the school administrators at Florence High School send their daughters to public schools in general and this public school in particular. And what might occur if a psychologically transgendered girl thought that it was alright to undress in the boys' locker room? Although I suspect one day of trying that would disabuse her of that utopian fantasy.

This society is trying very hard to self-destruct. And a lot of overeducated people with no emotional connection to high school students, common decency or Judeo-Christian morality are incapable of assuming the responsibility of acting "in loco parentis" (in place of parents to protect the high school children as a parent would). I suspect the progressives may now want to remove "in loco parentis" laws from the books. You think I'm being alarmist?

When one takes into account what has happened in Florence, Colorado and in California, I'd say I'm being realistic. Pamela Geller recently posted a story at Atlas Shrugs about "psychologically transgendered" males now allowed into, among other places, New York University women's bathrooms. http://pamelageller.com/2014/02/pamela-geller-wnd-institutionalized...
And how exactly does one distinguish a psychologically transgendered male from an ordinary male with no morals who wants access to the ladies' room? Do we post a psychologist at the door to interview him as he struggles to hold his waste products inside? This is madness.

Two years ago I was in a writing class which had a feminist woman student whom I got into a discussion with before the third class began. I mentioned the then famous case to her about the Girl Scout troop that was ordered to take in a boy who thought he was a girl - and take him camping overnight in the country. The local Den Mothers, two religious women, resigned rather than comply (I think they would have been in violation of state law and/or could be sued civilly). I thought I would catch the leftist in a quandary but she just sat their unmoved. I asked her if she had a little girl and must have hit a raw nerve. She replied angrily "No" and then defensively asked me if I had one. I replied that I didn't either but I still thought (for the common good) that little girls should be protected from this. That is what these sicko leftists are: feminists who won't protect girls - and, of course, won't protect boys.

The Barbarians are at the gate - at the INSIDE of the gate. And we had best fight hard for our children's present as well as future.

Views: 1039


You need to be a member of Tea Party Nation to add comments!

Join Tea Party Nation

Comment by Ray Marks on February 16, 2014 at 8:02am

X=X & Y=Y figure it out. Until X=Y or Y=X it's in your mind NOT your body. What does science say about X an Y and male and female?

Comment by william e grant on February 11, 2014 at 4:23pm

WHAT BOTHERS ME IS NOBODY IS CALLING FOR A RECALL ON ANYBODY ((((( WHY DON'T THEY SEE THE EVIL & FIGHT IT  )))))))) ?????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????

Comment by Jack Kemp on February 11, 2014 at 1:42pm

TV shows like "Glee" actively lying about the happiness of being gay...

Yes, I agree, James. On YouTube, there is a Dr. Phil show about transgendered kids where the doc says outright that psychologically transgendered teens kill themselves at double the national average for teens. Barbara Walters didn't say that on her show on transgendered. These kids are confused and ashamed of being confused and ashamed of their mixed feelings. Some resolve them as straights, some resolve them as gays or transsexuals - and some resolve their feelings by ending it all.

Recently I saw a sign for sale that would fit perfectly in this Colorado high school in the article if you change the word "work" to "study" and perhaps the word "crazy" to "constantly anxious" in the sign. It said, "You don't have to be crazy (constantly anxious) to work (study) here. We will train you."

Comment by James Flowers on February 11, 2014 at 12:20pm

"Please be kind and try to understand the dilemma the child is in. Adding to it by cruel statements without knowledge of the anatomical reasons only hurts them worse."     An excellent example of a compassion bully.  (Compassion the preferred weapon of the political bully.)  Translation -- "You better not say anything that is not PC, even if it is the truth, or I'll call you a bully, a homophobe and I'll have the PC Gestapo have you strung up."

How laughable! 

No I don't have any sympathy for this male child -- because he has an over-abundance of sympathy laid upon him by the libs, local, state and  federal government, soo much so that little girls are having to endure state sponsored bullying for their natural uncomfortable feelings. 

Yes let's examine the dilemma of this child:

A PC world where:

1.  heterosexuality is discouraged

2.  Heterosexuals are considered to be innately hateful

3.  TV shows like "Glee" actively lying about the happiness of being gay

4.  Hollywood glamorizing kids being gay, as in the movie G. B. F.

5.  Gender & sexuality is so confused that 15-20% of professed heterosexual NY high schoolers report to have had homosexual experiences -- i.e.  orgasm is god -- "so what's the big deal who I hook-up with?!?"

6. A PC world where if one finds themselves to be one of the unpopular kids in school, one only needs to proclaim themselves gay or transgender and viola instant popularity.Did this male child have 2 lesbian feminists as his parents?

Comment by Jack Kemp on February 11, 2014 at 6:13am

Nancy, since there are no constructed 3rd bathrooms in the school administration's plans above, let me pose another question to you. Will a high school girl, forced to let some gender identity confused biological male see that coed naked in the locker room, be more or less inclined to insult and belittle the confused biological male in both the locker room and in the halls of the school because of what she had to endure by having her privacy taken away from her? The obvious answer is she will be angry and, depending on how feisty she is, will be more likely to insult the psychologically transgendered male, making his life more miserable. But the school administrators and the idealists can get a sore arm patting themselves on the back for their "tolerance."

Comment by Jack Kemp on February 11, 2014 at 5:28am

"A sensitive school would provide other choices for bathroom and gym dressing and undressing. It is truly unsettling and a misunderstood situation for those who are not accustomed to this."

Nancy, that is the point. I could agree with your solution. But the school administrations mentioned in the article and in the comments are not wanting to be sensitive. They want to destroy the classic standards of decency and culture which America has practiced for over 230 years. They want to take a hammer to the culture and smash it to remake it into a socialist factory with "interchangeable parts," people with no allowed individual differences. These actions cited in the article are about willfully abusing the majority, not protecting the minority with gender confusion issues.

Comment by Doug Nicholson on February 11, 2014 at 12:32am

I think that any boy who wants to use the girls' facilities SHOULD be allowed to do so…as soon as he/she has had "the operation".

Comment by Robert Wyan on February 11, 2014 at 12:03am

Teenage boys are being given a legal way into the girls gym locker room to watch teenage girls dressing and undressing. Some teenage boy is going to lie about being a transgender student, just to get access to the girls locker room.

Wait until a girl is allowed into the boys gym locker room or restroom and gets raped. The school district will be sued by the girls parents. The girl and her parents will say the school didn't provide a safe environment for the girl.

If someone doesn't think either of these scenarios will happen. Please explain why  you don't think they can't or won't happen.

I wonder if the private all girl school that the Obama girls attend would allow a boy to attend the school if he was a transgender.

Comment by Steve Merkel on February 10, 2014 at 9:52pm

New Massachusetts rules allow transgender students to choose their own bathroom --The Daily Caller – Mon, Feb 25, 2013

A student’s biological gender is apparently no longer the primary consideration in the Bay State when it comes to going to the bathroom or using a school locker room.

An 11-page set of guidelines recently distributed by the Massachusetts Department of Education on how to deal with transgender students mandates that such students should now be permitted to use the bathroom they feel most comfortable using, reports The Washington Times.

The rules apply to every public high school, middle school and elementary school in the state.

“A student who says she is a girl and wishes to be regarded that way throughout the school day and throughout every, or almost every, other area of her life, should be respected and treated like a girl,” the directive instructs.

“Transgender students who are uncomfortable using a sex-segregated restroom should be provided with a safe and adequate alternative, such as a single ‘unisex’ restroom or the nurse’s restroom,” the new rules also stipulate.

The guidelines also say that the discomfort other students could feel about sharing traditionally sex-segregated bathrooms or locker rooms with a transgender student “is not a reason to deny access to the transgender student.” The justification for this rule is that transgender individuals are frequently “at a higher risk for peer ostracism, victimization and bullying.”

Comment by Nancy Evins on February 10, 2014 at 9:47pm

Medical experts report many cases of transgendered people. It is no more a shame than those who are born with weak hearts or some other situation that can be corrected. How would you as a man, really think you are a woman inside a man's body? There is a long ago medical case where twin boys were born and one had a genital defect so the doctors and the parents decided to make this boy a girl. though they dressed him in girls' clothing and gave him girls' toys, he was convinced he was a boy, and rightfully so.

A sensitive school would provide other choices for bathroom and gym dressing and undressing. It is truly unsettling and a misunderstood situation for those who are not accustomed to this.

Please be kind and try to understand the dilemma the child is in. Adding to it by cruel statements without knowledge of the anatomical reasons only hurts them worse.

Tea Party Nation is a social network

© 2016   Created by Judson Phillips.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service