Eric Holder Retreats from DOMA
Eric Holder considers love the basis of marriage rather than marriage as an institution that supports its own foundation. Marriage is a corporation that pragmatically benefits itself. But love has little relevance to marriage. Marriage is basically a corporation where a man and a woman join together to have children and protect each other from their inherent proclivities—the man’s tendency to recklessness and the woman’s need for physical protection.
Eric Holder disagrees with DOMA which defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman and allows spouses medical, dental and other benefits. He doesn’t recognize that same sex marriage destroys the historical fabric of society. That it contradicts the natural family structure.
Marriage is not an affair. It is a business arrangement. Marriage is between a man and a woman because they have negative and positive polarities that attract. Their unification is a societal building block.
Marriage is stipulated as a compromise between opposites. Thinking that it is a same sex proposition doesn’t make it different. Licentious redefinition does not make same sex marriage permissible or sensible. Why should we offend the thinking of ninety-nine percent of the population just to satisfy the homosexual leanings of a tiny minority?
To give benefits to gay spouses is ridiculous and celebrates the logical contradiction of same sex marriages. Why do the gays want us to rename their proclivities as norms? Giving gays benefits de-benefits society and bankrupts the functioning corporation of marriage.
Often gay rights are wrong. There can be no rightness in misconstruing a woman as a man or a man as a woman. It would be like eating a bone rather than the lamb chop. It’s time we stopped feeling guilty about someone else’s differences. Let them be but let them be other than me. It’s time we solidified the country with the structure of opposite sex marriages.
Eric Holder’s abandonment of DOMA is short-sighted. The military’s whole identity depends on their sexual and physical confidence. Soldiers are automatically discomforted by homosexuality’s effeminacy and should not have to confront it when they are putting their lives on the line for us. If I were them, I wouldn’t want to die for a gay society. Many soldiers will bow out of service. Soldiers go into the service to feel cool. Rightly or wrongly they won’t feel so cool when they are sharing dorms with gays. Is Holder more interested in appeasing the liberal left or generating an army that can defend us?
Of course, Holder and Obama don’t really want to defend us. In addition to confusing our sexuality and ratifying its redefinition, they are giving up most of our nuclear weapons, scaling down the military and the navy and ruining our economy so that we can’t afford to fight. Is there a method to their madness or is there just self-destructive madness to their method?