Real Time Analytics


 

 

David Lawrence

awesomelawrence@aol.com

 

Eric Holder Retreats from DOMA

 

Eric Holder considers love the basis of marriage rather than marriage as an institution that supports its own foundation.  Marriage is a corporation that pragmatically benefits itself. But love has little relevance to marriage.  Marriage is basically a corporation where a man and a woman join together to have children and protect each other from their inherent proclivities—the man’s tendency to recklessness and the woman’s need for physical protection.

 

Eric Holder disagrees with DOMA which defines marriage as the union of one man and one woman and allows spouses medical, dental and other benefits. He doesn’t recognize that same sex marriage destroys the historical fabric of society.  That it contradicts the natural family structure.  

 

Marriage is not an affair.  It is a business arrangement. Marriage is between a man and a woman because they have negative and positive polarities that attract. Their unification is a societal building block. 

 

Marriage is stipulated as a compromise between opposites.  Thinking that it is a same sex proposition doesn’t make it different.  Licentious redefinition does not make same sex marriage permissible or sensible.  Why should we offend the thinking of ninety-nine percent of the population just to satisfy the homosexual leanings of a tiny minority? 

 

To give benefits to gay spouses is ridiculous and celebrates the logical contradiction of same sex marriages.  Why do the gays want us to rename their proclivities as norms?    Giving gays benefits de-benefits society and bankrupts the functioning corporation of marriage. 

 

Often gay rights are wrong. There can be no rightness in misconstruing a woman as a man or a man as a woman.  It would be like eating a bone rather than the lamb chop.  It’s time we stopped feeling guilty about someone else’s differences. Let them be but let them be other than me. It’s time we solidified the country with the structure of opposite sex marriages.

 

Eric Holder’s abandonment of DOMA is short-sighted. The military’s whole identity depends on their sexual and physical confidence.  Soldiers are automatically discomforted  by homosexuality’s effeminacy and should not have to confront it when they are putting their lives on the line for us. If I were them, I wouldn’t want to die for a gay society.  Many soldiers will bow out of service. Soldiers go into the service to feel cool.  Rightly or wrongly they won’t feel so cool when they are sharing dorms with gays.  Is Holder more interested in appeasing the liberal left or generating an army that can defend us?  

 

Of course, Holder and Obama don’t really want to defend us. In addition to confusing our sexuality  and ratifying its redefinition, they are giving up most of our nuclear weapons, scaling down the military and the navy and ruining our economy so that we can’t afford to fight. Is there a method to their madness or is there just self-destructive  madness to their method?

 

Views: 1547

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Nation to add comments!

Join Tea Party Nation

Comment by Robbie Eagle on April 22, 2012 at 8:55pm

ANTI- 'GAY' MEANS YOU'RE A CLOSET HOMOSEXUAL?

I remember this from this 70's.It all ended a few years ago when the Dr. who claimed to have found a gay gene admitted  before he died  that he lied because he was gay & wanted gay's to be openly accepted.He said being gay is a choice.Are they rehashing this again to get gay marriage pushed through on the Fed. level?vbho needs it,he is in trouble with the group.

Comment by Henry Hekker on April 22, 2012 at 8:14pm
I was a cop for 32 years and worked the streets and jail with some gay partners who were as good as any other cop and better than some. When the s''t hit the fan I knew they had my back (no pun intended). If they can put their lives on the line for the citizens of their cities why can't they do it for the citizens of the USA. Do I approve of gay marriage, NO, and my gay police partners knew it.
Comment by Robbie Eagle on April 22, 2012 at 6:47pm

 Let the gays have their civil unions,but don't allow them to marry or adopt.They will die out in one generation.LOL!!

Comment by John Henry Botkin on April 22, 2012 at 4:27pm

From Miriam Webster online:

Definition of PERVERT

transitive verb
1
a: to cause to turn aside or away from what is good or true or morally right : corrupt b: to cause to turn aside or away from what is generally done or accepted : misdirect
2
a: to divert to a wrong end or purpose : misuse b: to twist the meaning or sense of : misinterpret

Those who would choose to pervert their sexual expression so that they burn with desire for partners of their own sex actually harm society in general.  Their example is one of rebellion against godliness in the eyes of Christians and Jews.  Their example is one of rebellion against the norms that adhere to godless Darwinist theory since their actions do not promote the processes that lead to the improvement of the species.  Their example is one of  rebellion against good health practices since homosexual practices spread many diseases.  Their example is one of rebellion against all that is seemly.  What can be more unseemly that an effeminate male seeking sexual attention from another male or the male who gives it to him?  The same is true of females who burn with desire for each other.  To those who claim that there is a genetic mandate to homosexual behavior, I challenge them to show proof.  There is none.  On the other hand there is abundant evidence that the sexual urge is subject to social manipulation.  Those who advocate homosexuality are dangerous to all impressionable young people.  Obama's whole administration is engaged in a perversion of government and all levels of social behavior.  
Comment by SHARRON AMSTER on April 22, 2012 at 4:09pm

Columbo' I left the west coast for that reason and I am seventy. I know what you saying. I'm with you.

Comment by Columbo Steve on April 22, 2012 at 3:51pm

PS: I live on the west coast and we voted in marriage protection, Prop 8, and a gay judge threw it out. So much for the will of the people.

Comment by Columbo Steve on April 22, 2012 at 3:50pm

My dear friends... If we keep this type of social issue in front of the public we will lose the elections coming up. Make a big deal about abortion, lose the election. Defend the upper 1%, lose the election. Attack the elderly, women, students, minorities... lose, lose, lose. The issue should be the fiscal Titanic OB has place us on. Crushing debt, cronyism, no jobs that's how we can win. Get power first, like the Demos have done, then make the changes by appointing the right judges. None of this matters until conservatives take hold of the power in this country for an extended period of time, maybe 20 to 25 years. Till then, we are just a bunch of foolish losers!

Comment by SHARRON AMSTER on April 22, 2012 at 3:41pm

Take a long look at the rest of the world. They did it and look how it has work out for them. This is what they want foe us. Bring us down to their level. I say don't do it. This is America and WE ARE THE PEOPLE.

Comment by Barry Gabrielson on April 22, 2012 at 3:29pm

Destroy the marriage, destroy the country.  Gain a culture that accepts and tolerates everything, the culture turns soft, liberty gone.  Dont step up, accept and tolerate immoral behavior, we are done as a country.  Dont step up, dont get involved do to fear of retaliation, keep quiet, dont offend anyone, go along to get along, lose your freedom.

 

 

Comment by Charles F Nichols on April 22, 2012 at 3:23pm

Never in my life have I heard so much disagreement with a presidents policies ,no if fact out right outrage! So much that it really begs the question ,who is it that gives this man an approval rating? Sure ,in the past there has been certain groups that were upset with one decision or another but nothing like today. Insert the idea that this is because today we are having socialist ideas and principles forced upon us. Not presented and voted on as accepted rather shoved down our throats with no choice on the matters. Could someone point to one American aspect of our life that this administration supports or defends? This is what earns him the title of most un American president in history.  No matter how his minions write the history books,the book of truth will have him as the worse president in the history of the world. More akin to Judas or Benedict Arnold selling out his countrymen for a pocket full of gold. Every person who had a hand in supporting this lunatic should receive the full punishment worthy of all traitors. 

Tea Party Nation is a social network

 






© 2013   Created by Judson Phillips.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service