Beware America, These Clintons Are Slippery Little Suckers

I caught this one on Hot Air originally, and it is fun to watch Marco Rubio eviscerate the narrative laid out by Hillary Clinton, that Benghazi is soooooo yesterday, and represents that tiny distraction issue that only qualifies for, "minor league," political discourse. Rubio however, missed the cheap magician's trick, as I believe most of us on the right are prone to do, especially when it comes to all things Clinton. Just one more comment to make before we proceed to the festivities folks. These Clintons are the best retail and tactical politicians America has ever produced. That skill however, like all things left of center, is based upon nothing more than cheap magic tricks, O.K., great magic tricks, misdirection and slight of hand. We, collectively, as a group who wish to see America survive this progressive assault upon our Constitution, must not allow ourselves to be fooled by the Okey Doke.

This is the first time I've read anything by Noah Rothman. He seems to write well enough to be on one of the web's most influential sites, and his observations are well researched and astute enough for my tastes, but in this case, he's missed the point, as had Senator Rubio. When dealing with Clintons, that can be a deadly combination. Granted, Hillary is no where near as slick as her husband, but if we aren't very careful in how we fight against this woman, we very well may be calling her Madam President one day in our very near future, and that would be a disaster.

From the Hot Air article linked to above:

Hillary Clinton has a Benghazi problem, and she knows it.

She knows that a majority of Americans, according to a recent Washington Post/ABC News poll, support the formation of a congressional select committee to investigate the attacks. In spite of Team Hillary’s strategy of casting anyone who is concerned about the deaths of three American servicemen and a U.S. ambassador as a harebrained conspiracy theorist, only 42 percent said they believed the attack has been investigated enough. That same survey showed that only 38 percent of adults approve of how Clinton handled that incident and its aftermath.

Clinton’s Benghazi problem is part of what led her to prominently feature the September 14, 2012, casket ceremony at Andrews Air Force Base on her book’s back cover art. Clinton’s Benghazi problem is also what led her to make a series of flippant and dismissive statements to ABC’s Diane Sawyer about that attack. It’s all part of a critical effort to reclaim the narrative surrounding her response to that deadly attack.

When asked by Sawyer if the Benghazi probe would deter a White House bid, Clinton replied that it has made her even more inclined to run in order to prove a point. “Actually, it is more of a reason to run because I do not believe our great country should be playing minor league ball,” she insisted. “We ought to be in the majors. And I view this as really apart from, even a diversion from the hard work that the Congress should be doing about the problems facing our country and the world.”


Asked to respond to those comments on Tuesday on CBS News’ This Morning, Sen. Marco Rubio (R-FL) exploited the obvious opening that Clinton’s strategy has created. Coldly, soberly, dispassionately, Rubio charged Clinton with an insufficient concern about threats to American national security.

“The State Department had at its disposal a steady stream of reporting about how dangerous – how much danger that facility in Benghazi was in,” Rubio began. “It is a fact they did not take sufficient security measures, and it is a fact that perhaps it shouldn’t have even been there, and it is a fact it should not have been there and it is a fact they did not have an extraction plan in place that was sufficient.”

“If she thinks it’s something we shouldn’t focus on, then perhaps that gives insight as to why it happened in the first place,” Rubio added, delivering the coup de grâce.

Did you catch it, the misdirection? Hillary wants this all talked out now, so that in two years time, we won't be having a discussion about the very real issue that we should be concerning ourselves with. This whole Benghazi thing is not about this one failure, but the fact that this one failure, as horrific as it was, is only part of a larger failure. Benghazi was the only possible result of implementing The Kumbayah school of foreign policy in the first place. Let's explore this a bit, as my keen Spidey Sense tells me that you're pulling away a bit.

We'll start here. Nothing Hillary says is unscripted. Bill may be allowed to stray from the script and ad lib, but not Hillary. There's no question as to who the brains in that operation happens to be, and who is the worker bee. Hillary has canned responses programmed for each of her turns at any microphone, and if the question does not fit exactly, she'll pivot until it does. This woman has not said anything spontaneous since the Hindenburg went down, and this interview, along with her, "what difference at this point does it make," jaw droppingly brash comments at the original Benghazi lie fest are certainly no exception to that rule. Kudos to the low level dweeb who wrote this material for her, he or she must certainly be on the Clinton short list for promotion and subsequent self sacrifice for the cause.

Hillary does know that this isn't going away, but she is not trying to remove it from the public discourse. Quite to the contrary, she and her husband both want us talking about blast walls, security contingents, escape plans, response times, anything really except for why the embassy was attacked in the first place. On day one of Hillary's stint as our nation's top diplomat, she signaled to the world that America was ready to repent for unfairly being the world's lone super power. That Mattel Toy Reset Button signaled to each and every one of our enemies that standing still and taking what ever they wished to dish out to us would be taken, and that we'd simply say, "thank you sir, may I have another." Barack Obama's famed Cairo Speech, broadcast to the world, was the beginning of an apology tour that saw us saying, "I'm sorry," to every tin pot thug hanging out in the worst toilets the third world has produced to date. Projecting American Weakness became our official position on every crisis faced by the world at large. Does, "leading from behind," sound familiar? I understand that a group of linguists from MIT are still attempting to decipher the Obama Doctrine. They needn't bother, gibberish will always be gibberish.

It is no coincidence that attacks upon American interests bloom like wild fire, literally, when ever Democrats are in the White House. Their entire foreign policy philosophy reminds me of the time hippy neighbors attempted the great Summerhill experiment of 1972. Every child in the neighborhood spent two entire days running into the hippy household and leaving with handfuls of candy completely unchecked, all convinced that Matty's parents had finally gone completely nuts. To their credit, the flirtation with Summerhill only lasted a day or two. Not so with Democrats and their beliefs. When Hillary asked, "what difference at this point does it make how they died," I was massively disappointed that not one of the people doing the questioning found the adequate answer, which was this. "The difference Madam Secretary, was that their deaths could have been easily prevented by taking smarter actions two years ago, when this suicidal foreign policy was enacted. The slightest embrace of America's strength as a positive thing for the world as a whole, and not viewing that reality as a problem to be solved, would have prevented our embassies the world over from becoming fire wood during the entirety of 2012."

Hillary knows exactly what she is doing here, and make no mistake about it, so long as we only take issue with her straw man arguments, and not her vision as a whole, she's won. When asked for a specific accomplishment while serving as our Secretary of State, Hillary offered this missive. "I've restored America's stature in the diplomatic community, and our friends like us again." That statement is really a knee slapper when one considers the fact that the whole conversation is centered around four of our citizens being dragged from an embassy in the first place. This entire discussion is most certainly not the stuff one who is witnessing America's improved world stature would expect to be having, ever.

If Hillary can keep the conversation on her idiotic premise that President's can't be concerned with small issues like the placement of blast walls and such, then we won't be talking about the small fact that her plan is to continue the very foreign policy that fomented the situation we faced in Benghazi to begin with. I am by no means ready for Hillary, and neither is America, should America wish to prosper. Keep this in mind, Hillary will not be easy to defeat. She and her husband are formidable foes to say the least. They are masters at framing the debate in a way that benefits their own narrative. They are also expert at knowing which shots they can take, and which ones are lethal, and more importantly, how to avoid the latter. If we are to stand a chance at preventing a Hillary Presidency, we must learn to fight on the real issues, and not on the silly crap that she positions as the real issues.

In that respect anyhow, I guess she is right, her comments do represent the minor leagues. Let's drag her cheap magic trick pulling a** up to the majors. Let me leave you with this exit quotation from Thomas Sowell's latest piece of brilliance.

We may yet become the first nation to die from a terminal case of frivolity. Other great nations in history have been threatened by barbarians at the gates. We may be the first to be threatened by self-indulgent silliness inside the gates.

Cross Posted from Musings of a Mad Conservative.

Views: 622


You need to be a member of Tea Party Nation to add comments!

Join Tea Party Nation

Comment by A. R. on June 12, 2014 at 3:03pm

Nor I!!!

Comment by John Wiseman on June 12, 2014 at 1:09pm

Rich Knoch,

The dog ate it.  Somewhere out there, there is a very fat Democrat dog, undoubtedly with gastric distress.

Comment by Rich Knoch on June 12, 2014 at 12:52pm

"the rodham" has the idea that simply living with willy, a zipper challenged dude, she has the silver-tongued ability to lie and get by with it as willy has done his entire life.

She's sadly mistaken but she does continue to fool her cadre of Useful Idiots, who hang on every lie.

Once she lies through all her other lies she'll still have to explain how $6 Billion went missing while she was Secty. of State, if a Republican has the Spine to ask the question.  

Surely the RNC, anxious to grab Defeat from the jaws of Victory will advise against asking this question, in public.


Comment by Lizzie on June 12, 2014 at 10:16am

Bottom line:

Hillary is totally incompetent to handle the 3AM phone call.

The fact that she hates America is really secondary-- she couldn't run the country well if she wanted to.

Comment by james simpson on June 12, 2014 at 10:01am

Very good post. Critical to read and spread. Right on!

Comment by Morry Markovitz on June 12, 2014 at 9:42am

I think the correct answer to HIllary is to NAME THE ISSUE:

"Saying that we should be playing in the major league is Hillary's way of avoiding the question, and avoiding the fact that SHE's the one who couldn't even make the farm team in the very areas she describes as the little league.  Hillary has PROVEN HERSELF to be a thoroughly DISASTROUS FAILURE in what she describes as the little league, as TOTALLY INCOMPETENT even to dust off home plate and make sure the simplest basics are properly handled, and now she is offering her conclusively proven  total incompetence even at menial little league tasks as a reason to give her the job of manager of our  major league team.  

"She has some gall, and a very shrewd way of twisting words and facts.   But the American electorate is not the crowd of stupid lamebrains HIllary thinks they are.    They know that a tenderfoot cub scout wouldn't have made the blatantly obvious mistakes she did.  Americans know that you don't put a private who's incapable of doing KP duty in charge of military strategy.   Americans are too smart to fall for Hillary's evasions, word mincing, and outrageous twisting of the obvious truth."

Comment by Phil McConathy on June 12, 2014 at 8:52am

Hillary and Bill are just like the slimy creatures from the black lagoon. They are only concerned about THEMSELVES and America be damned. I don't trust them a millimeter. Both narcissists just like our current so-called leader.

Comment by Sally Furgerson on June 12, 2014 at 8:39am

Its  to bad Obama was paid to destroy American.. if he had a b rain that works to clean up rathrer than destory he may have been a good P> Hillary is not a TRUE AMERICA either.. any one would  think in the  bad and dangerous countrys she visited in her 4 years  one would think she would  saving American  from bec not thhis time.. the rich are hated..

Comment by Gail E. Engelhardt on June 12, 2014 at 8:36am

This should be called understanding Slick Willie and Slight of Hand Hillary tactics.  It makes a person furious to listen to the tripe coming out her mouth and how she turns the tables on a question of importance to make it sound frivolous.  We need to keep hammering home that "What difference does it make now" statement as being that it makes a Hell of Lot of difference to the American People.  We can't let  her get away with constantly controlling the narrative with diversion tactics.

Comment by frank miller on June 12, 2014 at 8:34am

hang "Hillary" now !!

enough evidence has been brought forward from the "Clinton's" past to

hang BOTH !!!


Tea Party Nation is a social network

© 2016   Created by Judson Phillips.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service