America’s Abortion may end with North Dakota Personhood Law
History may mark February 7th as the day that Personhood for the unborn was established. This is the day that provided the unborn at conception the God given right to life bestowed upon all since the beginning of creation. This is a significant step in the continuing evolution of sanctioning the protection of life which has been riddled by abortion rights activists since the infamous 1973 Roe v. Wade U.S. Supreme Court decision.
Forty years and 55 million plus deaths of the unborn who committed no crime except to be conceived in God’s image were murdered. This was accomplished because of a court and society that would protect a tree frog’s existence above a human life. These murders may soon be put to a stop with the North Dakota Personhood Measure that passed in the State Senate. When it is established that a fetus has U.S. 14th Amendment constitutional protection, abortion ends in America!
Often times in the history of monumental movements, they often have their genesis in the hearts and souls of the faithful who are unwilling to witness or permit the undoing of basic rights. The aptly named Personhood Constitutional Amendment initiative would codify the constitutional protections and absolute rights afforded all citizens of North Dakota and equally apply them to human embryos.
This is not just a momentary battle that supporters of life will wait to see what will happen in North Dakota’s House. The fact is that, in North Dakota as well as other states that are considering Personhood laws; the war for life should and can be won on the local battleground of state turf. These legislators, unlike their federal congressional counterparts, are not afraid to stand up to protect their religious values and principles, under the heat of unceasing liberal mass media contempt.
At the very core of the right to life is the imbalance that exists in continuing to treat the right to exist and to be born as incidental and given no more value than extinguishing the life of a common earth worm. The rights of the mother is given weight not as the carrier of life, but the right to her privacy to do as she pleases, which includes state sanctioned murder.
Yet for forty years the growing tearful cries of fathers who will never be, and mothers who are now filled with regret because of abortion. Their mournful regret is coupled with birthrights of the unborn, sheered away by abortion clinics.
Comment
Comment by Lizzie on February 28, 2013 at 2:39pm Final thoughts:
-I want to thank Kevin Fobbs for posting this good news.
-Kate Bowe, I know you had reservations about posting your story.. but it's a beautiful story about what's possible with God. Would you consider re-posting it in American Infidel's Pro-Life group?
Comment by Thomas Angle on February 23, 2013 at 7:34am Just a note. At the time Kate got pregnant. It was a very difficult decision to do what she did. Small towns can be harsh and in a day when getting pregnant before you where married was taboo (let alone a preacher's daughter). When her and her future husband done took way more courage than most pregnant girls now a days would ever have to muster.
God has a plan for all of us. Most I believe do not listen when He talks to us. But ending a life because we do not obey one of His commandments is not his plan. Kate and her future husband messed up. But then done what God wanted them to do and He blessed them. If you follow God's ways and do things for His glory, he will bless you in ways you can not imagine. Kate's story in just one example.
Kate, just before my grandmother dies. She sat up and told my aunt that she was going home. Maybe that is what you mother said.
Comment by Kate Bowe on February 23, 2013 at 12:24am Comment by James Flowers on February 22, 2013 at 12:51pm According to John (12 weeks = 84days), in this image, there are no stages of development (up to 60 days) that are alive. (see: http://embryology.med.unsw.edu.au/wwwhuman/Stages/Images/Cst800.jpg)
Seems to be more than just "a clump of cells".
-----------------------------------------------
John's soliloquy comparing end of life with the beginning of life is an excellent example of how the intellect is warped by the Gospel of Death. John is comparing a fetus that hasn't even taken its first breath, and has the full potential of doing great & good things for the world
To…
An elderly person whose, through natural aging and after a full life of experiences, body is wearing out.
So in John's warped concept of life:
A newly conceived child's "odometer" is equal to that of an elderly person's, (Average life expectancy is 78 years)
In other words: 1 minute = 40,996,800 minutes, respectively. The math doesn't even equate.
---------------------------------
In John's Concept of life ----- Brain = Life "YOU are determined to call it "life" when it has no brain"
This means:
The Kingdom Plantae* (all plants) – Gone
The Kingdom Fungi --- Gone
The Kingdom Protista* (all single cell organisms) – Gone
Phylum Porifera (sponges) -- Gone
Phylum Cnidaria (jelly fish, sea anemones, coral anemones that make the world's coral reefs) – Gone
Phylum Platyhelminthes (flatworm) – gone
Phylum Nematoda (round worms) -- gone
Any animal of pre-brain development – gone
* All herbivorous animals including cows - gone (their "food" depends on the flagellates in their gut to break down plant fib… – oops --- I forgot no plants for the herbivores to feed upon)
* Oops forgot --- no brain = no life = no plants = no oxygen = no John
In John's concept of life, a grasshopper, which has a brain, has more potential to do good for the human species than the potential of a Human fetal child.
["Organism" is also a good vocabulary word.]
John said: "YOU are determined to call it "life", when it has no brain yet"
Indeed, I'll accept that complement!!!
--------------------------------
Finally, what is the defense for abortions 12 to 36 weeks and up, including partial-birth abortions?
Comment by JOHN DELASAUX on February 21, 2013 at 10:40pm James Flowers wrote: "We got it, John --- you are determined to find any means / excuse possible to give yourself the right to end life."
No, James.
YOU are determined to call it "life" when it has no brain yet, and no proprioception. [If you have never heard that long word before, look it up in Google. You will add an important new word to your vocabulary and to your understanding of what constitutes LIFE.]
Comment by JOHN DELASAUX on February 21, 2013 at 10:34pm Kate wrote: "To abort a child before it is born because you think it's life won't amount to much is believing that you know what is best for that child."
I never said that.
You missed the point:
Imagine that you are the pregnant lady, and you know that your boyfriend just said he would not support a baby, and your little job does't make enough to live on, and you are an alcoholic or drug addict.
You know that your baby is going to starve, and you may lose your crummy job if you can't work a full day every day, and you don't have enough money to buy your next drug fix or pay a hospital bill to have a baby.
And, you can't sleep at night with the worry .........
And, then, you can fix all your problems (you think) and get your boyfriend back, just by having an abortion, which he is willing to pay for.
==================
Kate - do you really want to make abortion illegal? Who would you put in jail --- the lady, the boyfriend, the doctor -- or all three?
And, for what -- "murdering" a clump of cells which has no brain and no proprioception of its own existence?
Every place where the question of making abortin illegal was put to the voters, they rejected the idea by 3 to 1.
Comment by James Flowers on February 21, 2013 at 9:29pm ===================
John D ----- James Flowers wrote: "Hey, you already made the point yourself -- (How many babies suffer starvation, abuse, and even death when born into a sick environment?) which would you prefer? Hunger, abuse, illness, etc. on this earth or directly up to heaven? "
==========================
And I retracted that statement as stupid & rash!
===============
JOHN D --- And, how many pregnant women foresee that life for a potential child and take action to save it from that fate?
==================
You are giving the mother (and yourself) the ability to foresee the future, you are giving the mother (and yourself) the right to objectify and place a value (or lack of value) on that child, you are giving the mother (and yourself) the right to objectify and to place value on life. You further have made a foregone conclusion that the mother would not or should not place the child up for adoption. So you are again giving yourself the right to place judgement on the potential adoptive parents.
As I said in a previous post --- you seek any excuse possible to give yourself the right to kill any child or end any life, while others of us seek to find any means possible to save the child's life and her / his potential to contribute good to the world. You are obsessed with your self-given right to kill the child or end life.
==================
John D ---- The idea that a clump of cells, without a brain or any ability to feel its own personhood, is a live person is ludicrous. It is a fiction, made up to support the idea that it is "murder" to "kill" a clump of cells.
================
It is fiction and contrary to the science of biology and embryology, to believe that the zygote is not alive and, left alone, will not complete its full development.
So if you see someone running around the woods destroying bird's nests & eggs, stomping on frog eggs in a pond, or turtle eggs on a beach --- that will be John declaring himself the right to end life because that life has not reached his prescribed definition of birdhood, froghood or turtlehood.
====================
We got it, John --- you are determined to find any means / excuse possible to give yourself the right to end life.
Comment by JOHN DELASAUX on February 21, 2013 at 7:34pm Someday, you may run up against a statement from a doctor who says, "I'm so sorry to have to tell you that your Mom (or Dad) (or wife)(or husband) has no brain function. We have tested overnight, and he (she) would not be able to breathe on his (her) own. If we turn off the ventilator, he (she) will probably die in a few moments.
Although it is a difficult question to consider, most people are able to confront the fact that their loved one has reached the end of life, because life depends upon a functioning brain. Otherwise, the body is merely a collection of cells which have no congnizance of existence and no future to look forward to. The positive decision to put the person in Hospice and accept the results of removal of the ventilator is difficult, but necessary.
There is a startling similarity between the end-of-life scenario and the beginning of life.
At some point (about 12 weeks) in the development of a clump of cells into a living being, the fetus develops a nervous system and brain such that it can sense its own existence, have a proprioceptive sense, and thus move its arms and legs, in a concious activity. The mother notes this as "quickening", and thus becomes conscious that the fetus is actually a live person with a brain and sensations of its own body mothions.
It is now a live person.
The idea that a clump of cells, without a brain or any ability to feel its own personhood, is a live person is ludicrous. It is a fiction, made up to support the idea that it is "murder" to "kill" a clump of cells.
Comment by Kate Bowe on February 21, 2013 at 11:33am Comment by Kate Bowe on February 21, 2013 at 11:19am © 2013 Created by Judson Phillips.
You need to be a member of Tea Party Nation to add comments!
Join Tea Party Nation