Work From Home

We aren’t communist?

When the obvious is obvious, why is it that there are those who can’t seem to see the obvious? Strange metaphor is it not? That we in this nation have those who can’t see this obvious scenario that this nation is as communist as any that has ever been, or will ever be!

Perhaps it’s our identification of what we use as the yard stick to measure what is a communist government?

When we look at the definition of communism, it is obvious that it had never existed, will not ever exist, and cannot exist as it is defined. Communism is a revolutionary socialist movement to create a classless, moneyless and stateless social order structured upon common ownership of the means of production as well as a social, political and economic ideology that aims at establishing this order.

Is it not interesting that the failure of communism is defined in the very first identification of this ideology? Why is the word ‘revolutionary’ so prominent?

The answer is simple really—for in fact communism is based on the oldest of human actions—theft. This is the why it must be a revolution of taking that from a society that has productive capacity—as communism is not the ideology of the beginning…for it produces nothing…as the literate history of mankind has proven.

There is no more one need to know of communism. The basis of this dementia and the results are all based in this simple reality.

One thing about communism is that reality is never part of the evaluation. Take a moment to think of this; movement to create a classless, moneyless and stateless social order structured upon common ownership of the means of production as well as a social, political and economic ideology that aims at establishing this order.

We read this presentation using the word classless. What does that mean? Or is it to make some social distinction to create the very ‘revolutionary’ ‘theft’ from those who have produced? What is the difference between the simple philosophical identification of our ‘Declaration of Independence’ where we state ‘All men are created equal!’ Does this not make all men in the same class—are we not all created by our creator with the same foundations of physical structure? Do we not all have a brain, some intellect, and the capacity to observe and make independent decisions? Is not this the whole concept of Christianity—that we have free will—and as such have by our choice the desire to do what we wish?

You see, the philosophy of Christianity, that all men are created equal, and that we are endowed by our creator with certain unalienable rights—makes simple fact; it identifies man’s very existence.

Does one not have to have a ‘willing suspension of disbelief’ to even think of this statement, and not find one’s self in complete confusion of what it could possibly mean? Think of this and engage your reasoning. Communism is a moneyless and stateless social order structured upon common ownership of the means of production as well as a social, political and economic ideology that aims at establishing this order.

In the world of critical theorist, they take a statement, then correlate it with something completely illogically different, put the two together and say; see doesn’t this make sense. Is this not one of those sentences, and can’t you identify this obvious illogical and irrational reasoning in the very presentation.

Think of this; the term moneyless—and then the term economic ideology—is there a problem with this? If we are to have an economic ideology, how do we do it without some measurement of activity? For if there is not measurement, how do we know that whatever we are doing is for good or bad, right or wrong, productive or wasteful? Is there not another question that should also be asked? How do we determine who is to be the most educated…for we need certain skills in our society…from all others? If we require more effort from some—as becoming trained as doctors—then in this classless society; why would anyone work hard and become accomplished, what is the motivation? What altruism of magical proportion exists to have some work hard, while the true communist, sits back and receives the theft from others? Do we not ensure that if it is not there to steal, we will ensure that none ever achieve, and we will not have what is required in the future?

Yet the coup de grace is the wonder of the ‘stateless’ social order! Is it not interesting that in the communist societies, all is dictated by the god little (g) of government controlling all things? How is this ideology so stateless when it is the power of the state that dictates all in society and everything that is done? And is it not interesting that the objective is to create an ideology aiming at ‘establishing order?’   

So now we have the identification of just what communism proposes. Shall we hold it up to the mirror of the current American experience and see the obvious?

First of all; let’s look at the idea of a moneyless society. We use money in this nation as a measurement—but the value of that money is dictated by whom? Our nation in design was very careful with the power of giving the state control of the ‘value’ of money. The reason was simple, we had the experience. In both Britain and in this nation—when the state can make money out of thin air—or with just ink and paper—it makes money not representative value, but the whim of the state. Is this not the perfect example of a moneyless society; replaced with currency of state dictate?

This is the most interesting term of all communist identifies to me; common ownership of the means of production. Now many believe this only applies to the workers taking over the means of production; but what about corporations? Is not a corporation an entity that allows those who wish to participate in this common ownership of the means of production the same thing? Except there is one interesting difference; in the ‘fallacy’ of communism, the wealth is stole by whom? Is it the people, or the state? In the fiction it is the people, but in reality is it not the state?

Let’s take it one more step; who pays the majority of taxes that supports the state? Is it not the corporations? If the corporation is the procurer of wealth for the state—the means of production used to finance the state—then are not they also an extension of the state? If they are, are they not also then controlled by the state? If corporations are controlled by the state, and spend their time procuring legislative actions for…political actions in the legislative halls of the state—for the state controls them…is this not communism? Is this not the means of production are controlled by the state? If not, who can possibly show or explain that the very entity of corporations, which are based on legislative fiat of the state’s creation, are not as communist as direct interference in the production of the state—as in communism?

The true identification of communism is as old as time—or the literacy of mankind. It is the clash between the ‘liberty’ of man and the totalitarian sovereignty of the state. When the state has all of the power—as occurs in this nation today—then the society is but vassals of the state’s design. This is communism.

Think of how different that concept as our first tyrant explained, a society of the people, by the people, and most importantly for the people—not the state—has perished from the earth!         

 

 

 

  

 

 

Views: 956

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Nation to add comments!

Join Tea Party Nation

Comment by Judy Lyford on June 12, 2013 at 11:50am

Dan, Thank you for the truth. It hurts to admit we have become a communist country, but it can't be fixed without admitting the problem.

Comment by No more flip floppers on June 12, 2013 at 9:25am

Dan, you are absolutely correct! People like John R. Lancellotti need to realize that in todays high-tech society, our freedoms can succumb to Communism in the blink of an eye. Do you not realize the Commi's have control of the EPA, Dep of Ed, FEMA, FDA, DOD, military, DHS, TSA, NSA and more. Plus they want our guns!

Seriously???

Wake up! It's probably already too late.

Comment by John R. Lancellotti on June 12, 2013 at 1:15am

DON SHORT ... No ... in my opinion and your tortured explanation notwihstanding ... we are NOT Communists and this is NOT Communism.  The state certainly is TENDING towards it ... but despite the best efforts of the radical Democrats, we have remained a capitalist nation.  I should probably go back and re-read your post but frankly, I had trouble staying awake as I read it the first time.  In my opinion, it was far too ESOTERIC to actually have any meaning...or effect.  John R.

Comment by kinthenorthwest on June 11, 2013 at 9:51pm

Just recently i was thinking  back to the 50s,60s and 70s.  Back when what we loved most about our country was the freedoms we had that other countries like Russia, East Germany & China didn't have.  We were told how the citizens in these countries could get arrested for saying or doing the slightest thing that could be construed Anti-government. I mostly remember how people in Russia, and Eastern were so afraid of all the spies that spied on them everywhere.

So here we sit in the same shoes of these countries, and so many are applauding our government doing these things to us.

How far away are we from being the the Russia, East Germany and China that we once feared.

Comment by James Flowers on June 11, 2013 at 9:02pm

"Common ownership of the means of production"  The politically correct name for this is "Social Justice".  No liberal can define "Social Justice" without running into Communism.  Although, there is true social justice enshrined in our founding documents  ---  "the unalienable right to life, liberty, and the PURSUIT of happiness."  Social Justice for the liberal (aka communist) means the guarantee of happiness, (taken from the producers by the government.).

What's to stop Obama from running another 4 years, there are house democrats pushing for ending term limits?   One wonders how Obama supporters would react if Obama, himself, proposed to end term limits?  And what about all the lack of term limits for all the members of Congress?  (Tea party folks have been pushing & dreaming about term limits for everyone.)

One election does not make a democracy.  And the uninformed will never notice the end of democracy until AFTER the last election.  (there are many instances of "democracy" one day -- dictator the next  ---  Palestinian "elections", Nazi Germany, essentially any democracy that ever existed, so it is arrogant to think democracy cannot end.)

Like a sadistic brat that cuts off the legs of a frog, then gets mad at the frog for not jumping, That is how liberals treat the free market system.  They destroy it then blame free-market capitalism for not working or not being fair.

(For example:  They put in place minimum wage policies (which were originally developed in the Jim Crow era to keep blacks from competing with white trade unions), then they blame capitalism for our Wal-mart monopoly-based economy.   In the real world minimum wage laws place barriers b/w the working man & the elites.  How can a black man compete for labor (workers) and grow his business if he cannot afford the government required labor costs?  How can a young black male gain on-the-job training if the government places wages so high that entry level jobs are taken by more experience folks = a "living wage".  That is,  for any entry level position a black employer has to pay a wage that would support a family of four ---  how many young teenage black males should be supporting his parent's family?  (So a black entrepreneur in rural Duplin County, NC has to pay a minimum wage that would support the employee of a white liberal executive in New York City.)

Only the rich elites can afford these "regulations" and wages,  thus our Wal-Mart economy.  Elite liberals and unions know this and support government coerced regulation of wages & labor costs to push the entrepreneurial black man out of competition, while the uninformed liberal is easily played by the "something for nothing" promises and need to feel compassionate.  What do elitist liberals have to worry about, when government keeps putting up barriers to prevent up-ward movement of the entrepreneurial black man?

Conservatives blame government and corporations that participate in Crony Capitalism.

Conservative work for a Free-Market economy where government cannot pick winners & losers; among their crony corporate supporters (Solyndra) or their political enemies (IRS v/s Conservative groups.) respectively.

Conservatives believe in the dignity and entrepreneurial spirit of the individual; not the selective "generosity" of government (with tax-payer money).

Conservatives believe in subsidiarity, that your community knows better how to care for your neighbors than some politically appointed bureaucrat 100s of miles away.   Conservatives believe in family, community, church responsibility for their members. It is about everybody having the right to PURSUE happiness without the government (and their elitist corporate supporters) putting up barriers to the "peasants".

To learn about what conservatives support economically, one should google, read and utube Dr. Thomas Sowell or Dr. Walter Williams.

(I single out Black men as a major victim of liberalism, but these liberal policies hurt everyone.  But let's be honest:  Nobody cares if a elderly white trailer-trash woman dies in a pool of her own urine.)

Comment by Stan Williams on June 11, 2013 at 7:44pm
I will continue to say this... The POTUS can only serve 8 years. You can blame Obama all you want. Why does government make the descions that they do? To stay in office? How can they stay in office?
Comment by Stan Williams on June 11, 2013 at 7:14pm
I think that divide and conquer is what is going on. It's crystal clear. I think that it comes down to "who is at blame"... The left systemically blames corporations, which makes sense. The right at the root blames government.

Why can't we be pragmatic and say the problem is with both corporations and government?
Comment by sharon ostwinch on June 11, 2013 at 6:59pm

Maybe Obama is misinformed.  NOT  he is a communist and his goal  this country will be via Islam or just plain genocide.

Comment by Frank Sebek on June 11, 2013 at 6:40pm

Who are realy communist.

Democrat at Washington DC and White House.

Comment by Herb Irish on June 11, 2013 at 6:36pm
On a personal note, I committed two years to a Russian joint-venture company, starting in 1991, attempting to work with a group of Russians to create a company to supply engineered systems and equipment to newly emerging industries formerly operated as part of the Soviet Union. I encountered the same problems we now have in America trying to motivate generational entitlement participants to get a job and get off welfare. After 70+ years of being told when to work, how to work, where to work, with no incentive other than a paycheck, I found that the Russians I was assisting had lost all desire to make their own decisions, be self-starting, to go beyond the minimal of physical or mental effort, or do any of those things required to become successful entrepreneurs. Actually. it was just like present-day America.

Tea Party Nation is a social network

Whole Body Research

Young Living Essential Oils

 






© 2014   Created by Judson Phillips.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service