Work From Home

Will U.S. Supreme Court Affirmative Action Case end Reverse Discrimination

If a lie is said often enough, it will become the truth when left unchallenged. Affirmative action is the new slavery. It is the new second-tier of citizenship, Abigail Fisher, in Texas does not keep your child from excelling in school. So why are black supporters of Affirmative Action letting Affirmative Action and its discriminatory use block Abigail Fisher’s opportunity at the American Dream?

Black mothers and fathers should seriously consider this. When was the last time you saw a white person stand in front of your child in school to keep him from learning? When was the last time you saw a white person stand in front of your child and told him to commit a crime? When was the last time that you saw a white person stand in front of your child and told him not to study, not to get good grades, not to try harder, not to do better, not to be better and not to succeed?

Race based affirmative action may come to a screeching halt and finally put an end to decades of reverse discriminatory policies utilized in higher educational institutions.

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court took up arguments concerning a case brought by Abigail Fisher, a white applicant who was denied admission to the University of Texas (UT) at Austin in 2008. Fisher is challenging UT-Austin’s decision to use a race-conscious admission plan which considers race as a factor in admitting students to its incoming freshman class.

Instead of using a fairer race-neutral plan, which Texas law already guarantees the top 10 percent of high school students in their graduating class admission to the university, UT-Austin, went a step further. It used an unnecessary and highly unfair reverse discrimination practice of considering race as a factor for admittance, thus making the purpose for the race neutral Texas law meaningless.

The problem which Miss Fisher and any other high school applicant in Texas and in any other community in America has to consider, is will they be admitted based upon their academic ability, content of their character or any other measurable qualities? ( Read More )

Views: 928

Tags: Abigail, Action, Affirmative, Court, Discrimination, Fisher, NAACP, Noel, Reverse, Supreme, More…U.S., UT-Austin

Comment

You need to be a member of Tea Party Nation to add comments!

Join Tea Party Nation

Comment by Sumsanity on October 11, 2012 at 8:50am

Calling it reverse discrimination indicates the discriminators are being discriminated against. The truth is discrimination is discrimination. The direction from which it originates is irrelevant. Discrimination based on race and creed etc is wrong and should be eliminated, not encouraged by law.

Comment by Wilafret on October 11, 2012 at 7:48am

You think that affirmative is doing this in the civilian populace you should have seen it in the military, It was awful, minorities were given totally different tests for promotions than the caucasians. The minorities test questions were written by sesame street, and the caucasion test were written by professors at the Military war College.

Comment by Richard Harper on October 11, 2012 at 3:16am

PS  And nothing about the meeting was ever reported.  Sounds like Chicago style intimidation to  me.

Comment by Richard Harper on October 11, 2012 at 3:14am

Jalina, most people do not realize that when Obama first took office (or maybe just after he was elected), he requested, and had, a meeting with the entire Supreme Court, at the Court.  I believe that is when he intimidated them.  It is the first time that has happened in history, and seemed strange at the time.  What other reason would a President Elect have for holding such a meeting.  I am amazed Robert agreed to it.  Talking about corrupting serparation of powers.

Comment by Richard Harper on October 11, 2012 at 2:14am

Because of the "guilt" of whites, in general, that was created and exacerbated by their leaders (after Martin Luther King - King did not believe in dependency of his race, and I have often thought he may have been killed because of it.  I do not think he would have approved of the tactics of Jesse Jackson and the idiot who lied about the Tiwana Brawley (sp?) case, whose name I can not remember right now.)  

 

All of the race preferrence has been carried to a ridiculous degree, IMHO, and has, unfortunately kept many blacks not only "on the plantation of government dependency", but encouraged their extremist groups, like the Black Panthers, etc.  They never mention the fact that at least (and I think it was far more) 41% of the white population was required to help them get the legislation passed by Congress anyway.  I have never heard one of their leaders mention that.  They take the credit all for themselves, never mentioning that a majority of whites are also instrumental in their having the rights anyway.   Slavery was a terrible thing of that century, and we did have a struggle over it as a nation, but all of this has gone on too long, and weakened their race as a part of the culture.  75% of black children now are born illegitimately.  In the 50's, they were the most religious segment of our society and there was very little illigitimacy.   They were much more Christian centered then, and like the rest of the population, frowned upon illigitmacy.  Their leaders and churches should be preaching against these changes in their society, because it just makes them more dependent, and helps their leaders convince them that they should value the government helping  them, more than keeping their religious values.  Their parents of the 50's are probably appalled themselves at the changes in their own segment of society from how religious they were in the 50's.  And it all lays at the feet of the leaders that followed Martin Luther King.  With the religious tendacy of the race, which is what got them through the horrible era of slavery, it is sad their own leaders led them into their state of dependency on the government, and to shed their values, just for the political power it has given them.  Just my opinion. 

Comment by jalina susan stutte on October 11, 2012 at 12:15am

The will probably uphold Affirmative Action if Obama gets re elected, because i think Obama has something on Roberts, blackmail if you will. That's the only thing that would explain his vote on Obamacare. If Romney wins I believe they will abolish Affirmative Action, which they should. Thier was a time that I feel it was needed but that has long passed. Now it's discrimination againest Whites in our country. Blacks and Illegals can go to college with Federal Grants but not white children. My son, my Son-IN-Law , were both told that if they were black they could recieve grants by the office workers in the local colleges. It's a shame. This has got to stop. Hiring people who are not qualified but the right skin color is disgusting and this will never help race relations in this country.

Comment by Dwight M. Schmitz on October 10, 2012 at 11:25pm

Agreed, Jerry. While I may not have the quote quite right, MLK preached that we should judge a man by the quality of his character, not the color of his skin.

Comment by Jerry Morris on October 10, 2012 at 10:23pm

I don't beleive Affirmative Action is what Martin Luther King had in mind. I also beleive he's be against it, if he were still alive today.

Comment by A. R. on October 10, 2012 at 10:04pm

This is WAY overdue! 

Comment by Dwight M. Schmitz on October 10, 2012 at 9:42pm

Yes, Billy, you're right.  I think I was trying to be logical, but then that's the same as being politically facetious and naive, right?  Liberals have hijacked MLK but conservatives seem to actually embrace him.

Tea Party Nation is a social network

Whole Body Research

Young Living Essential Oils

 






© 2014   Created by Judson Phillips.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service