Islamic Sharia law must be banned throughout our state and federal governments.  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/03/02/tennessee-lawmaker-conti...


We have duly enacted state laws and statutes throughout our 50 states in this, our United States of America.  We also have duly enacted, by our elected officials, federal laws and statutes.  Everyone who is a citizen of, and who lives in or visits the United States of America, is subject to the laws of our states and federal government.  No one gets to come to the United States and bring their own laws here and expect them to apply in our states or federal government, or our courts.  Islamic Sharia has no place in America.  We must enact legislation barring the implementation of this foreign, non-representative sect of law.  Islamic Sharia law must be banned throughout the United States. 


I, Lynne Torgerson, am running for Congress in Minnesota, against radical Islamist Keith Ellison.  Keith Ellison fails to oppose banning Islamic Sharia law in the United States.  He accuses people of trying to ban it as "conspiratorilists."  Keith Ellison also fails to support that the United States Constitution should be supreme over Islamic Sharia law. 



Views: 152


You need to be a member of Tea Party Nation to add comments!

Join Tea Party Nation

Comment by George Graham on July 20, 2011 at 8:40am

Islam is a system that was "invented" about 200-350 years AFTER the death of Ubu'l Kassim, (the real name of the "prophet" Mohammed).


Click here first: http://americasenemieswithin.blogspot.com/


and here second: http://nullificationandsecession.blogspot.com/2011/07/myth-of-mecca...  for proof

Comment by Gail Cohen on July 19, 2011 at 5:29pm
Christie should never be the nominee..must get funds from Muslims
Comment by Paul Shortino on July 18, 2011 at 7:25pm

I believe this says it all:

                       Can Muslims Be Good Americans?

                        (This is certainly “Food-for Thought’. What do you think?)

This is very interesting and we all need to read it from start to finish and send it on to everyone.  Maybe this is why our American Muslims are so quiet and not speaking out about any atrocities.  Can a good Muslim be a good American?  This question was forwarded to a friend who worked in Saudi Arabia for 20 years. The following is his reply:

Theologically- No…Because his allegiance is to Allah, The moon God of Arabia.

Religiously- No…Because no other religion is accepted by his Allah except Islam. (Quran,2:256)(Koran)

Scripturally-No…Because his allegiance is to the five Pillars of Islam and the Quran.

Geographically- No..Because his allegiance is to Mecca, to which he turns in prayer five times a day.

Socially- No… No…Because his allegiance to Islam forbids him to make friends with Christians or Jews.

Politically- No…Because he must submit to the mullahs(spiritual leaders), who teach annihilation of Israel and destruction of America. The Great Satan.

Domestically- No…Because he is instructed to marry four women and beat and scourge his wife when she disobeys him.(Quran 4:24)

Intellectually- No…Because he can not accept the American Constitution since it is based on Biblical principles and he believes the Bible to be Corrupt.

Philosophically- No…Because Islam, Muhammad, and the Quran does not allow freedom of religion and expression.  Democracy and Islam cannot co-exsist.  Every Muslim government is either dictatorial or autocratic.

Spiritually- No…Because when declare “One Nation Under God”, The Christian’s God is loving and kind, while Allah is Never referred to as Heavenly Father, nor is her ever called love in the Quran’s 99 excellent names.

Therefore, after much study and deliberation….Perhaps we should be very suspicious of All Muslims in this Country…They obviously cannot be both “Good” Muslims and good Americans.  Call it what you wish it’s still the truth. You had better believe it.  The more who understand this, the better it will be for our Country and Future.  The Religious War is Bigger than We know or understand……………………

Footnote: The Muslims have said they will destroy us from within.  SO FREEDOM IS NOT FREE. 

THE US MARINES WANT THIS TO ROLL ALL OVER THE U.S. Please don’t delete this until you send it on. You owe it to the Marine that is fighting for your Freedom in Afghanistan and Iraq!


Comment by Ronald DuBois on June 29, 2011 at 1:16am

Ron Sorrels, so far , Shariah-compliant rulings have been overturned. Yesterday, Governor Chris Christie (NJ) had his appointment of Sohail Mohammed to the NJ Superior Court confirmed, in spite of the pleading of many of us to the Judiciary Committee, in writing, in person, and in testimony, not to confirm him. He is the second Muslim to be appointed to that court. The reasons are these: Mohammed is the Muslim attorney who prevented Imam Quatanani from being deported by Homeland Security. Quatanani is Imam of the Passaic mosque, a longtime personal friend of Christie, as is Mohammed, and he lied on his application to enter this country. Seems he was in jail in Israel for terror-related activity, and failed to mention it when he applied to come here.

Quatanani also is connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, and is an admitted member of Hamas.

Christie sent an Asst. Prosecuter, (Christie was a Prosecuter at the time), Charles McKenna, to give a good character reference for Quatanani at the trial. Christie then appointed McKenna to head NJ's Dept. of Homeland Security. Now, as Governor, Christie has appointed Mohammed to the Superior Court. With Muslims like this climbing up the Judicial ladder, the appeals of Shariah-based rulings eventually will be heard by Muslim judges, like Mohammed. Which way do you think they will rule?


The aim of the Islamists is to take over from within, by infiltrating our courts, our military, our education system, our political offices, etc. Christie made a big mistake in appointing Mohammed to the Superior Court, and you are making a big mistake in thinking it's alright to have Shariah-adherent judges because their rulings can simply be overturned.



Comment by Robert L. Voelsing Sr. on June 29, 2011 at 12:27am

Dear Ms. T,,,I agree,,,but in my opinion,,,it is NOT the average everyday POL that's is pushing for Sharia law in our courts.   I'll bet you a huge NYC Pizza that it is the laywers,,,the trial lawyers assoc. & the judges,,whether they are appointed for life or elected in 'safe' districts,,,who are going to 'go to bat' for Sharia law in their courts. WHY???   In my opinion,,,they are AFRAID of muslim backlash & violence in their towns ,cities & above all,,their Courtrooms,,,,so in order to 'appease' the violent muslims,,,they just give in to them.   Just like the NYC POLS did in the 60's to try to avoid the "Long hot summers" in the so-called "Inner cities" a Pol correct term for ghettos

Best of Luck in your upcoming race against "Weepy" Ellison,,,who,,,like Obama,,,will side with the muslims.

PS   We need more Scandinavian Reps in Congress,,,especially Conservative ones. Good Luck Lynne.

Comment by Gail Cohen on June 26, 2011 at 12:09am
Any judge who uses Sharia law in their judgements needs to be impeached - get names and start proceedings
Comment by George Graham on June 25, 2011 at 11:19pm
Ron.you are so right. First nullification and if that doesn't work, secession.
Comment by Pat Chadwell on June 25, 2011 at 10:42pm
ron its the DOJ`s office an he is working for the MB along with bho....
Comment by Susan Wondreis on June 25, 2011 at 10:18pm

Why is there even a question about Sharia Law? This is America .I,m sure our laws would go over well in there countries. GET OUT and STAY OUT if u don,t like the laws here.We need our heads examined if we give it one second of a thought. Susan Wondreis


Comment by Robert Marcoccio on June 25, 2011 at 10:07pm
I just published a book on First Constitutions and not only are the original intents of separation of church and state defined within those documents, but the original intent that established religious and civil liberties -and are in detail of what these liberties are and how they are protected. After doing my research and trans-scribing the documents the most defining restriction upon government which establishes the separation of religious and civil liberties is that; the government can have no opinion in regards to religion-for or against.  It also establishes that the separation of church and state does not give the government the ability to exempt religious symbolism, or reference on public property or in official government ceremonies or assemblies.  This right to include religious regard in the daily business of government and display on public property is protected by - Personal Preference.   PERSONAL PREFERENCE is protected as the governments exclusion to not be able to legislate "how much an individual can pray or believe". Whether prayer or religion is in the public domain belongs to the people under the Tenth Amendment and that is subject to the rule of majority and not the opinion of the court or government.  The myth that the Constitution created religious and civil liberties, or established the separation of church and state is miss-information.  The original state constitutions did this in 1776-1780  Shariah Law is not a decision to be left to the court and this is exactly why a system of federal referendum needs to be established....www.thepetitionsite.com/1/ratification_of_absolute_consent

Tea Party Nation is a social network

© 2016   Created by Judson Phillips.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service