Started this discussion. Last reply by Jeff B. Willis Apr 15. 1 Reply 0 Likes
Please visit www.eagleforamerica.comThis week's post tackles a long awaited question: "Who are the "Neo-Cons?"Are they the "R.I.N.O.S?"Are they true…Continue
Started Mar 25 0 Replies 0 Likes
Please visit www.eaglesforamerica.comThis week's post exposes a secret that has taken it's time unfolding! The ;results aren't flattering.The question…Continue
Started Mar 17 0 Replies 0 Likes
Please visit www.eaglesforamerica.comThis weekend's post picks up discussion from the previous two posts. The subject is "contraction," how it would…Continue
Started Mar 10 0 Replies 0 Likes
Please visit www.eaglesforamerica.comThis week's post picks up on last week's thought, "the contraction alternative."Why wouldn't contraction work? Who…Continue
Jeff B. Willis has not received any gifts yet
john springer commented on Jeff B. Willis's blog post Defining Conservatives- What is and what isn't
Darrell Russell commented on Jeff B. Willis's blog post American in need of Visionaries, Risk Takers
John R. Lancellotti commented on Jeff B. Willis's blog post American in need of Visionaries, Risk Takers
John R. Lancellotti commented on Jeff B. Willis's blog post American in need of Visionaries, Risk Takers
John R. Lancellotti liked Jeff B. Willis's blog post American in need of Visionaries, Risk Takers
Cynthia Catsman commented on Jeff B. Willis's blog post American in need of Visionaries, Risk Takers
Paul Szemanczky commented on Jeff B. Willis's blog post American in need of Visionaries, Risk Takers
Jim Hoff commented on Jeff B. Willis's blog post American in need of Visionaries, Risk Takers
Debrajoe Smith-Beatty commented on Jeff B. Willis's blog post American in need of Visionaries, Risk Takers
Herb Irish commented on Jeff B. Willis's blog post American in need of Visionaries, Risk Takers
Jim Woods commented on Jeff B. Willis's blog post American in need of Visionaries, Risk TakersPosted on May 14, 2013 at 2:28pm 1 Comment 0 Likes
Please visit www.eaglesforamerica.com
This week's post returns to the classic question. What is really conservative. Perhaps there is no clear cut answer. What do know is that a lot of Americans have positioned themselves as conservatives, because it is a comfortable classification. Yet, when we review their support for "big government" and especially "government intrusion into the lives of Americans," they can hardly be called…
ContinuePosted on May 5, 2013 at 2:25pm 15 Comments 7 Likes
Please visit www.eaglesforamerica.com
Today's post begins with a recount of my communication with Cory Fritz, Speaker Boehner's Press Secretary. The point that is clearly made is Boehner faced an uphill, if not impossible challenge as House Speaker. There are lot of Republicans, including Tea Party activists who would like to see him replaced. Have we been unduly critical of John Boehner?
On paper, Boehner appears to have the right…
ContinuePosted on April 28, 2013 at 7:25pm 0 Comments 0 Likes
Please check out today's post on Eagles for America, "Social Conservatives- Neo-Cons or Constititionalists."
Please visit www.eaglesforamerica.com
The post picks up where the April 14th post left off. In that post, "Who are the Neo-Cons," a startling accusation emerges. Are these Neo-Cons indeed "evolved Trotskyites?" And, if they are, could it be possible that they have induced Social Conservatives to join them…
ContinuePosted on April 7, 2013 at 4:15pm 7 Comments 4 Likes
Please visit www.eaglesforamerica.com
This week's post picks up on a previous post in describing the Antebellum South's nearly forgotten, "Perfect Society." Modern application is thoughtfully detailed in an effort to flush out the "why" that this couldn't work in contemporary America. "No way! No how!" Or, so some might say! But let's look at the concept objectively.
"Perfect Society" is the polar opposite to Marxism. It must be…
Continue
Jeff Dover said… Hey Jeff,
I read your comment on my post and, yeah, it's all a crap shoot. As I see it, with a party structured along conservative lines, who would stay with the GOP, and why would they stay? What is there about us that wouldn't attract money, which you correctly note is key? In a very short while, after the mainstream media are done blaming the the GOP for the economic situation, their name will be mud anyway.
As for Rubio, he's a RINO. His credentials are perfect: no meaningful private sector employment on his resume, attorney, and one government position after another. How can he not be a part of that machine? It's his bread and butter. He does what he's told. And who's telling us he's a "conservative"? The Establishment!
Robert Bechtel said… Jeff I read and reread your post in secession fever and I think you are right on all counts.I also read your blog reaching out to the midwest and you are right . I truly think we the people must push secession. But I live in PA. I do not think PA. secede. Philly, harrisburg, and Pittsburg will not let that happen.
Lori Gibson said… Jeff, Unfortunately Obama would not likely accept the seccession of any states if they wished to separate from WH ?? I'm sure he would rather imprison or shoot any who defied his Communist takeover of America !
Donald Vastlik said… What Ron Paul should be able to do is influrnce the Republican platform to a more Liberai nian view.
Elaine West said… Jeff, you are honestly a very nice person and I'm sure you are sincere in your beliefs. However, I will always hold a different view than you on the Constitutionality of our politicians. My research has taken me to all the thoughts of the day, when the Constitution was written. Our forefathers never wanted an executive with split allegiance - of course they were concerned that a Britisher could somehow be elected and put us right back where they started.
I believe Sen. Rubio is a good man and capable politician. However, he has already proven to have an undue allegiance to his heritage. It is his goal to make life better here in America for the some 20,000,000 illegal hispanics. I have been a citizen of Arizona since 1953 and I've seen our state be driven downward towards 3rd world status because of the insurgence of these millions of illegal aliens. His actions show that he is willing to side with one faction over another in this issue - and I do believe it to be the WRONG SIDE. I agree with Eisenhower's "Project Wet Back" - removing these felons from our shores and allow them to come in through the proper channels. See numbersusa.com for the video "Immigration by the Numbers" for the very clear answer to this problem.
I am weary of fighting this fight and fighting against some very miniscule issues when our very foundation is being torn down before our eyes. Please understand that there are millions like me, who have educated themselves and are preparing for the fight of our lives.
© 2013 Created by Judson Phillips.
