Great news! Some dedicated heroes in the Great State of Georgia filed a lawsuit challenging obama's eligibility to be on the upcoming presidential primary in Georgia. Orly Taitz is one of the lawyers representing plaintiffs.
obama filed a motion to dismiss the lawsuit. Apparently, his argument was that the Georgia statute didn't apply to him [after all, he is the "one" we have been waiting for].
Just a few hours ago, the Georgia judge ruled, "oh, yes it does apply to obama" and DENIED obama's motion to dismiss the lawsuit.
Of course, the law suit isn't over. This ruling just means that the law suit may continue.
So! The next step for plaintiffs' lawyers is DISCOVERY! [The most beautiful word in the English language]. This means that plaintiffs' lawyers can demand that obama produce all the documents and records which reflect on his eligibility to be president.
Article I, Sec. 2, clause 5!
HERE IS THE JUDGE'S ORDER!
Some more info that I've just received, elsewhere on TPN. Not vetted, but here's the whole message:
Additional Information:Heads up. BH Obama is scheduled to give a speech in Las Vegas, Nevada, Thursday, January 26th at 10 AM so he will not be in court in GA. Thanks Debbie Smith Beatty
Need I comment further?
No need to comment further.
The point to this discussion is that Art. II, Sec. 1, clause 5, U.S. Constitution, sets forth qualifications for President. It is up to The People to enforce Our Constitution. What David Farrar (the Plaintiff) has done in Georgia is expressly provided for in Georgia Law. Farrar is seeking to enforce The Constitution, and he is showing us one of the ways to do it.
No court in the Country can force obama to appear - they lack the power (i.e., the means to enforce their order). However, one of the penalties available against a party who fails to comply with court orders is entry of judgment AGAINST him.
We will see what happens. No need to speculate. And speculation just takes us off the focus here: learning the original intent of Our Constitution.
Well! Today, obama's lawyer (Michael Jablonski) sent a letter to the Georgia Secretary of State complaining about Orly, the hearing officer (ALJ), how everyone knows that obama is a citizen, etc., and that they are not going to attend the hearing tomorrow.
So! The Georgia Secretary of State writes Jablonski back today and says, among other things, If you and your client [that would be obama] suspend participation, "you do so at your own peril."
Of course I don't know what will happen, but one result could be a "default" entered against obama and that the relief sought by plaintiff could be granted. BUT we will have to wait and see.
You can read both letters at Orly's web site: They are on the left side: http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
Pray for the Georgia Secretary of State also. Courage to do the right thing, and safety for him and his family. As for all who are in the fight.
This purports to be an account of the proceedings in court today (Jan 26). The author is not a lawyer, but his account of the evidence presented is consistent with the evidence I have seen online.
Looks as if plaintiffs put on a good case. We will see how the judge rules. It is common for judges to retire when they make their decision.
Then we will have to see what the Georgia Secretary of State does.
What our courageous Plaintiffs and their dedicated lawyers have done is an illustration of what Alexander Hamilton says we must do when people in the federal government trample on OUR Constitution:
If the federal government should overpass the just bounds of its authority and make a tyrannical use of its powers, the people, whose creature it is, must appeal to the standard they have formed, and take such measures to redress the injury done to the Constitution as the exigency may suggest and prudence justify. (Federalist No. 33, 5th para) [emphasis added]
Applause and Thanks to them all!
JUDGE TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGEMENT AGAINST OBAMA !!
and get even more complete details at the site(s) linked in and at the end of the article.
I have been informed by someone who is in a position to know that nothing is to be publicly announced until the 5th day of February.
Fox News just announced that Georgia declared Obama was eligible as a "Natural Born Citizen" because he was born in Hawaii! What am I missing?
Look at the wall of this Study Group.
PB, Although I have not been active for quite a while, I have been reading your blogs on Canada Press regularly. I also read the rules so I was puzzled by your reply. I have suffered 2 more mini strokes which apparently affected my memory and co-ordination but not reasoning powers. I am slower though!
I stick with my original thought (after reading your posts) that Obama is NOT eligible. You fired me up so that I am now a State Delegate for the GOP. I have serious questions about the Natural Born Citizenship of both Santorum and Romney. Are citizens to sit back and do nothing? I have been fighting on this for 3 years now. It applies to ALL - not just liberals.
Sorry about the health issues. Hope you are getting better.
On the wall, I posted a link to the website of one of the attorneys for plaintiffs in the Georgia NBC case (Orly Taitz) where she said we lost the case in Georgia.
Right! If obama's father was a subject of the British Crown when obama was born, then obama is NOT a "natural born citizen" and he is ineligible to be president.
Apparently, Marco Rubio's parents were not U.S. citizens at the time he was born. So Rubio would be ineligible also.
I don't know any Facts about the citizenship status of Mitt Romney's and Rick Santorum's parents at the times they were born.
But what has happened is that many people just don't care what The Constitution says. Many - e.g., Mark Levin - want Marco Rubio to be VP - so they ridicule and mock people like us who question his NBC status.
Sean Hannity, Ann Coulter, etc. also mock us. Hannity isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer and he fawns all over Rubio; but Ann Coulter knows better.
Re those who support obama: We already know they don't care what The Constitution says.
I wen to the link last night and Orly's statement was at the top of the page. After I posted on the Constitutional Study Group, it was not at the top. To be honest, I find her page layout a little hard to read. The link is here Mollie.