If you are in Illinois and your drain stops up, you have a problem. Actually, if your drain stops up anywhere, you have a problem. But in Illinois your problems are worse. And those problems say a lot about the priorities and idiocy of the left.
What is going on?
In Illinois, today if you need to by drain cleaner or other caustic substances, you must show a government issued ID and you will be entered into a database.
The impetus for the law was attacks on two women where acid was poured on them and they were badly scarred. Chicago Democrat Representative Jack Franks pushed this measure and the bill sailed through the Democrat controlled state legislature.
As typical of Democrats everywhere, when something bad happens, instead of wanting to punish wrong doers, Democrats want to punish and harass the great mass of law-abiding citizens. Two people were attacked out of a city of 2.7 million and now if you need to get something to unplug your drain not only do you have to show a photo ID but you must also end up on a government database. What is wrong with this picture?
While Democrats think it is perfectly necessary to inconvenience law abiding people by forcing them to produce a photo ID to buy drain cleaner, they still resist all efforts to require a photo ID to vote.
Why?
Well, it certainly says something about their priorities.
Stealing elections is important to the Democrats. Otherwise, in many elections, they would lose!
In Colorado, the Attorney General discovered almost 12,000 illegal aliens registered to vote. In the 2010 election, at least 5,000 of them did. In December 2011, four Democrat Party officials from Troy New York entered guilty pleas to voter fraud. In Tunica County Mississippi, a Democrat official was sentenced to five years in prison for voter fraud. In the last two years, ACORN itself and former ACORN officials were convicted in Nevada for voter fraud. ACORN submitted as many as 60,000 fraudulent voter registrations. They even registered the entire starting line up of the Dallas Cowboys as voters in Nevada.
Why?
They want to steal elections.
In 2006, George Bush extended the Voting Rights act for 25 years. This bill only covers southern states with a history of disenfranchising minorities. The original bill was passed almost 50 years ago and that history is long since dead.
We need to revise the Voting Rights Act to focus on eliminating the kind of voter fraud that the Party of Treason specializes in. Neither Tennessee nor Texas need to be under the scope of this law. Illinois, Nevada and Wisconsin, with their history of voter fraud do.
We stand on the edge of a conservative revolution. Simply putting conservatives into office is not enough. We must make certain that we eliminate the ability of the left to engage in voter fraud.
Permalink Reply by Dorothy Hill on Do you have your ID ready so you can buy the drain cleaner to pour over the PoliticalScumBag's?
Permalink Reply by Charles H. Sims on How/why can the US pass a law that applies only to specified states?
Permalink Reply by Michael Goodfellow on The US can't. The VRA is in effect throughout the nation yet the South seems to be the area where it is needed.
God help those poor folks in Chicago if someone gets stabbed with a steak knife. Then you'll have to show an ID and get on a database in order to buy steak knives. And what would happen if someone stuck a fork in someone?
The madness of regulation/government intervention gets crazier by the day.
Permalink Reply by Dorothy Hill on ...and We the SHEEPle 'effectively' allow same...
Permalink Reply by Philip Hoffman on I have stated this as it appears above many times. What if the founders acted as we do today. Thank GOD they didn't. They pledged their live,their fortunes,and their sacred honor. They had guts .
Permalink Reply by Henry Massingale on Dear Judson,
Did you not get the memo ?
www.google.com/publicdata
3,007,856 people live in Iowa
- Jul 2009
Source: U.S. Census Bureau
Results for Iowa Republican Caucus (U.S. Presidential Primary)
Jan 03, 2012 (100% of precincts reporting)
Mitt Romney 30,015-24.6%
Rick Santorum 30,007-24.5%
Ron Paul 26,219-21.4%
Newt Gingrich 16,251-13.3%
Rick Perry 12,604-10.3%
Only around 100,000 people voted in Iowa out of 3 Million People,
so why did Michele Bachmann opt out ? Or should I pull up the numbers for you ?
We must let go of actions by others, in order to bring a honest change and hope who we bring into Office will take the time to Re-Build America.
I do more them play around in these blogs, if you do not start over and re-enter each State again you will lose the 2012 Elections with such blog stories. The info you wrote about may be correct but its time to Unite The Tea Party...
Permalink Reply by richard a. rufffing on i agree UNITY wins over "diversity"; pathetic results in Iowa, but why does the establishment let this continue?? of course to divide and conquer the non-establishment majority; a true national party would have all voting done on the same day to choose a candidate and if people were well informed and engaged in their own freedom and liberty it would work well! by the way santorum actually won by a few votes in Iowa; looks like it didn't fit the narrative!
Permalink Reply by Judson Phillips on That is one of the reasons we are doing the 2/27 tea parties. Of course, we can rally until the cows come home but if we do not eliminate voter fraud, nothing matters. Stalin said, it is not who votes that counts, it is who counts the votes.
Permalink Reply by Norma J. Sears on That is true.
Permalink Reply by Roger Davies on Yea, vote early and vote often. What's wrong with that....
Permalink Reply by Scott Casteel on you can go back to 1867, i believe it was, and look at the Reformation period and see where the Feds made the states rewrite their State Constitutions under Federal supervision. State rights have been getting butchered for a long time. The Progressive Movement has been around a long, long time.
© 2013 Created by Judson Phillips.
