The upcoming battle
When November 2012 comes around, we can say one thing with absolute certainty. The man or woman who will be fighting Obama to save this country from socialism will be a Republican.
That is why the upcoming battle for the Chairmanship of the RNC is so important to the Tea Party. The Tea Party movement and the Republican Party are not alter egos. But many members of the Tea Party movement are Republican. Even those who are not Republican and do not want to be a part of the Republican Party get it. We cannot have to socialist parties dominating American politics.
There are five people in the race to be the next RNC chair. First is Michael Steele. Steele should be renamed Captain Titanic. It is harder to think of a greater epic fail than Steele’s mismanagement of the RNC. Thanks to Steele’s lack of management, the RNC is $20 million in debt. In the last election, it was so far in the hole, it could not even get out a get out the vote drive. Steele has repeatedly claimed credit for the 2010 electoral victories and Tea Party Nation has repeatedly pointed out, how many Michael Steele rallies were there in 2009/10? And let’s not forget the Steele deputy who thought it was a good idea to take major donors to a bondage club as a fundraiser. While Steele was not a part of that fiasco, he clearly had created a culture at the RNC where his deputy thought that was perfectly acceptable.
Reince Priebus and Maria Cino are the establishment candidates. Priebus, a Milwaukee lawyer, whose firm helped get clients federal stimulus funds, is considered the front-runner. He was a former ally of Steele, who decided Steele was weak enough now he could pull a Brutus and go for the top job. Cino was a lobbyist for Pfizer who helped push through Obamacare. That alone should totally disqualify her for ANY position in the GOP.
Ann Wagner is a conservative, who at one point was the RNC co-chair. To her credit, she has said the Tea Party has a seat at the table. But as this movement has exploded into life in the last two years, where has she been?
Then, there is Saul Anuzis. At Tea Party Nation, we have not been shy in stating that he is the best choice for RNC chair. The Daily Caller in describing the debate said of Anuzis, “alone of all the candidates, Anuzis seems to have a deep grounding in conservative thinking.” In other words, he is a true conservative, not simply someone who gives lip service to conservatism then goes off acting like a drunken Democrat!
As we have said in the past, as we head to 2012 it is open season and RINO is on the menu. Stopping socialism and restoring conservative control of the government is a war that must be fought one battle at a time. One of the most important battles is taking the RNC chair away from the RINOs and putting a good conservative in there. We need you today to call your RNC members. Each state has their own members. Call them and tell them you want a conservative as the next Chairman for the RNC. Call them today and ask them to support Saul Anuzis to be the next Chairman of the RNC.
Attached at the end of this blog is a directory of RNC Members.
- Attachments:
-
-
Member Directory 10.15.10.pdf, 174 KB
-
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Robert D. Stooks on -
Let's keep our eyes and ears open folks..
-
Permalink Reply by Barbara Markway on
-
Make those phone calls today, follow up with an email or letter. We must win!
-
Permalink Reply by Tom Backers on -
I watched parts of the RNC debate yesterday and was impressed by Wagner, but unimpressed with the choices overall...Anuzis is a "Beltway Boy" that has been after the RNC Chair for years...I see no substantive change in Party direction under his leadership, but I will give him this....HE HAS CONNECTIONS TO LOTS OF PAC $$$$$$$$$$$$$$......
The only question then becomes, which PACs, and what do they seek in return???????....he put Dan Benishek in Stupak's House seat almost single handedly with his Beltway connections, raising nearly $300K for his primary run almost overnight...
I reserve judgement on him, although I tend to lean in the direction of my Tea Party friends and State Republican insiders who do not support him....we shall see...
-
Permalink Reply by O. P. Ditch on
-
PLEASE! Someone show me a photo of ANY of these people at a Tea Party sponsored event this past year?
-
Permalink Reply by David Payne on
-
Having this venue available is of great import. Its educational factor is enormous. With a name like Saul Anuzis it will not be one chosen randomly by many people. True, no one should vote randomly or without doing research on the candidates but I am sure we all have. We see blurbs on TV and the occasional article in magazines and newspapers but they are all superficial and slanted to suit the source. The name Saul (sounds Jewish) Anuzis (sounds middle-eastern) could be a turn-off for many people. Come on, you know if his name was Drew Brees he would get a lot of votes by name alone. It is unlikely a lot of press will go for him because he is a Conservative. This site is invaluable for those of us not in the mainstream. Where else will we hear much, or anything positive, about Saul Anuzis?? Too bad his name isn't Mr. America.
-
Permalink Reply by TC in Austin on -
Hey DP, I love the Drew Brees reference! He's an Austin boy, and we are SO proud of him :-) What a great role model :-)
-
Permalink Reply by Longing For Liberty on
-
As for me I can't support Anuzis. He was among the most outspoken against Congressman Ron Paul being included in the debates. Ron Paul ignited the torch of Liberty in my soul! Now, you don't have to agree with me or even support Ron Paul, but tell me when it becomes acceptable to limit the scope of ideas and prevent the advancement of liberty. When the majority of mainstream Republicans can get on stage and they all seem to be saying essentially the same thing (the approved conservative agenda) and Ron Paul can stand and say something all together different and so profoundly rooted in our Constitution and the ideals of our Founding Fathers, the very seeds of the Tea Party Movement that we are all longing for and proclaiming now. Yet Mr. Anuzis desired and worked to prevent those ideas from being part of the Republican debate. Again, I'm not suggesting anyone here need support Ron Paul, but how can we support someone who aimed to limit the scope of ideas allowed at the table.
-
Permalink Reply by Barbara Graham on
-
This is a good question and we would like an answer to it.
-
Permalink Reply by Karl Koenigs on
-
First off, I have no problems with making sure that the NRC Chairman is as a Jeffersonian Constitutionalist as possible.
This brings me to the point and my prediction. The REPUBLICAN MACHINE, while much better than the vast majority of Socialist / Communist Democrats, do not and are unable to follow the RULE OF LAWs in the enumerated powers and money clauses of Article I Sections 8 and 10, of The Constitution, as reinforced by the Supremacy clause of Article VI, all of which are further reinforced by The Supreme Law of The Land by the 9th and 10th Amendments. In other words, the Republicans are almost as much the usurpers as the Democrats and all of you here on TPN knows it, what's more!
1. The Republican machine is going to blow up over the course of the next two years between the statists, socialists, tyrants, elitists and the ones who truly believe in individual Rights, Liberty and the Rule of (constitutional) Law on our Government.
2. As it does so we will realize that we need to elect somebody who is going to be a strict Jeffersonian Constitutionalist and that is only possible by way of a third party.
3. The economy will collapse before the election in 2012 due to inflation followed by a 72 hour hyperinflationary event that few can comprehend or want to comprehend or even want to hear or talk about. The result will be the U.S. Government going into full out survival mode to protect the vast majority of all the usurpations that far exceed the enumerated powers authorized under Article I Section 8. The people of the country will divide between Tories, who support most or all Socialist/Communist programs, such as Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, and Medicare Prescription Drug usurpations and a thousand other usurpations, and the Free and the Brave. To protect the vast majority of the U.S. Government usurpations in size, scope, power and spending this whole process will result in a declaration of “Emergency Powers”. The Federal Government, however, will state that it is to protect “the masses” from the potential for civil unrest. You all know what that means. Also it means elections will be postponed until further notice.
4. Since the chances of having another election are about as good as a snowball’s in hell. What you all need to decide now is whether you are going to be a Tory or a Free man?
5. We HAVE TO support the Rule of LAW in The Constitution and the canons of The Declaration of Independence, word for word, less any Amendments that can be clearly proven were not ratified by the States, such as the 16th and 17th Amendments, due to the lying Secretary of State Philander Knox treacherously deceitful tally of State votes. IL Department of Revenue Special Agent Criminal Division Bill Benson has 17,000 documents, most State Certified and Sealed, proving that the 16th Amendment was never ratified. He testified on C-Span and showed a pile of evidence. This brings me to a couple of questions:
-
- How did America survive without any income tax for almost 150 years?
- How was it possible, after the Civil War when the U.S. Government replaced “Greenbacks” with real money as per Article I Sections 8 and 10 of the Constitution – Gold and Silver coin, for the average common workingman to become far richer than we are today in the twenty years following the Civil War, and the country became a Super Power, before there was any Income Taxes?
Sorry about being so blunt, but I have been studying world history, world economics and world politics for decades and unless history and natural economic facts are lying my projections are up near 96% likely.
-
-
Permalink Reply by Robert R.Sewell Sr on
-
THAT IS VERY INTERESTING EXPLAINING ABOUT AMERICA'S CONSTITUTIONS & AMENDMENTS , ETC.
THAT IS TRUE AS WE ALL RIGHT NOW PICKING UP AND SET UP STRONG UNITED BETWEEN REPUBLICANS AND TEA PARTY TO SAVE OUR AMERICA COUNTRY BACK AND DOING THE RIGHT WAYS. FOR MANY YEARS MOST OF US GOOD PEOPLE ARE "SLEEPY HEAD" AND THAT IS HOW SOCIALISTS , COMMUNISTS, BILDERBERGS, UNIONISMS HAD PLANNED TO CAPTURE AMERICA COUNTRY AND PEOPLE INTO SLAVES AND TRAPPED SINCE THEY HAVE WORKED SO HARD FOR 30 - 44 YEARS PLANNED BY SEN. EDWARDS KENNEDY AND FAMILIES , HENRY KISSINGER, SEN, JAY ROCKEFELLER - ROTHSCHILD FAMILIES, SEN. JOHN KERRYAND FAMILIES ,BOTH GEORGE W. BUSH SR &JR, AND MANY OTHERS LIBERALISMS DID THAT AND TRYING TO DESTROY AND CAPTURE AMERICA FOR THEIR WEALTHS AND GREEDY AND TURN US ALL GOOD AMERICANS INTO SLAVES !!.
SO RIGHT NOW THAT HISTORY HAS TAUGHT US LESSONS FROM STEALING AMERICA FROM GOOD PEOPLE AND WAKE UP AND PULLUP OUR SLEEVES.BEST AS WE CAN WITH HELP FROM GOD!.
STAY THAT WAY RIGHT NOW DO NOT INVITE TO ANY OF THOSE CRONIES AND OBAMA INVLOVE WITH REPUBLICANS AND TEA PARTY NATION. WE MUST AWAKE AND CLEAN OUT THOSE CRONIES INTO PRISON AND THAT IS OUR HERTIAGE AMERICAN'S RIGHT TO DO AND SAVE OUR COUNTRY BACK
FOREVER FOR SAKE OF OUR FUTURE CHILDREN !. GOD BLESS YOU ALL AMERICANS REPUBLICANS AND TEA PARTY NATION RIGHTNOW ,
-
Permalink Reply by TC in Austin on
-
Add to the list of organizations destroying our country after 1913 - the Federal Reserve (The FED) and the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR). Do YOUR RESEARCH!
Both of these subversive organizations are destroying our country - and members of the FED are ALL members of CFR - some are past and/or present directors.
If you REALLY want to take back America, we have to get rid of the FED and minimize the influence of the CFR in American affairs.
Here is a slideshow explaining the FED (Misnomer created to fool the public).
http://www.wtv-zone.com/Mary/BIGGESTSCAMINHISTORY.HTML
© 2013 Created by Judson Phillips.
