
The attack on Herman Cain has escalated. It is now a full out political assassination. While Herman Cain’s candidacy should rise or fall on its own merits, the left does not want that to happen.
What is new?
Gloria Allred, lawyer and professional attention whore, has brought forth one Sharon Bialek to claim that Herman Cain made a pass at her fifteen years ago.
Of course the left wing is going nuts over this, seeing the possibility of destroying another conservative.
Allred wasted no time in going after Cain and trying to build up the credibility of this woman. She is a “Republican” and she saw Cain a few months ago at a “Tea Party” event.
And of course, she threw out the obligatory, if he did this to her, how many others are there?
This story gets even more suspicious as Cain reached out to members of the Chicago Tea Party, since she alleges the a meeting between them occurred at a Chicago Tea party event and shockingly, no one remembers her.
From Politicalarena.org:
When Sharon Bialek said that he was with Herman Cain at the Chicago TEA Party event with Herman Cain I reached out to one of the key voices and leaders of the Chicago TEA Party C. Steven Tucker and he says “I did not recognize her Chuck and I was there all weekend.”
I have been reaching out to my other friends in the Chicago TEA Party and so far no one recognizes her. Gloria Allred portrayed Bialek as a TEA Party Republican. Having seen her picture Bialek is not someone who goes unnoticed easily.
Tucker comments further:
I have spoken at Tea Party events ALL OVER Chicagoland including TeaCon Midwest 2011 where Gloria Allred says her client “confronted” Herman Cain. I have never seen nor have I ever even heard of a Sharon Bialek.
The media wants to portray this woman as a Tea Party Republican. Can we have some proof of this? And if she is a Tea Party Republican, why is she reaching out to liberal lunatic Gloria Allred?
These allegations are just that. They are allegations without corroboration. Could there be? Allegedly Cain and Bialek were alone in the car in 1997, but what about the confrontation at the Chicago Tea Party event? With all of the cameras that were there and you know they were following Cain around, surely there would be at least one photo of this confrontation.
It is impossible for Herman Cain to prove this did not happen. You cannot prove a negative. It is a he said, she said confrontation. Those are the easiest accusations to make and the hardest to prove.
Some corroboration of her claim would be nice. While there can be none for the 1997, there could be for the Chicago event. The fact that there is not one single photo of her at the event speaks volumes and calls her credibility into serious question.
Permalink Reply by Keith Jackson on November 7, 2011 at 7:28pm
Permalink Reply by JC Patriot on November 7, 2011 at 7:29pm
Permalink Reply by Judson Phillips on November 7, 2011 at 7:32pm
Permalink Reply by Bob dohnal on November 7, 2011 at 7:36pm
Permalink Reply by American Infidel on November 7, 2011 at 7:48pm
Permalink Reply by American Infidel on November 7, 2011 at 7:37pm
Permalink Reply by JC Patriot on November 7, 2011 at 7:40pm
Permalink Reply by American Infidel on November 7, 2011 at 7:47pm
Permalink Reply by JC Patriot on November 7, 2011 at 8:09pm
Permalink Reply by Jeff Waller on November 7, 2011 at 8:57pm
Permalink Reply by Doug Nicholson on November 7, 2011 at 11:40pm
Permalink Reply by Janet R Arnold on November 7, 2011 at 8:07pm I saw David Axelrod listed as an attorney in the case. Could this be...perhaps, just maybe...the white house David Axelrod? Interesting...
© 2013 Created by Judson Phillips.
