Real Time Analytics



 

 

In the aftermath of the Arizona shootings, we expected lunacy from the left.   We expected more sense from the GOP.  Peter King (R-NY), who is best described as not being the sharpest knife in the drawer, is going to introduce a bill that prohibits the carrying of firearms within 1,000 feet of a member of congress.

 

Perhaps he can pass a new law while he is at it requiring us all to bow down to Members of Congress when we come within 1,000 feet of them too.

 

This bit of lunacy is in response to the shooting of Congressman Gabrielle Giffords, so perhaps we should start with the most important and most obvious question.

 

If this law had been in effect last Saturday, would it have stopped the shooting?

 

No, of course not. 

 

If you are going to introduce a law in response to something that has happened, perhaps someone might take a look at the law and ask the obvious question, will this stop a future occurrence of such an act?

 

Jared Loughner is nuts.  He is probably legally insane.  Would such a law have stopped him?  No.   Just to make the point, and remind those who are incapable of intelligent thought, like Congressman King, Arizona has had a murder statute on the books since it became a territory.  That did not deter Loughner.  The Federal Government has had a law against murdering Congressmen for over two hundred years.  That did not stop Loughner. 

 

When you have someone as far in left field as Loughner is, no law is going to stop him.  When you have someone who is obsessed with the idea of killing someone, a law is not going to stop them.  If laws stopped crimes, there would be no murders, robberies or rapes. 

 

Laws deter law-abiding people.  People like Loughner are by definition incapable of obeying the law.  Congressman King, your moronic law would not have helped anyone.

 

In law school, law students are often told that bad cases make bad law.  Someone needs to remind Congressman King, bad laws cause all kinds of unintended problems. 

 

In the Weekly Standard, King was interviewed about his new law.  John McCormack asked a very good question.  He said, what about what happened when the shots were fired?  A man with a gun ran to the aid of the people.  Would he be guilty under this new law?

 

King had no idea, “because the law has not been written.”

 

Congressman King, the only people who will be prosecuted under this statute are law-abiding citizens. 

 

Congressman King also said he was open to other gun control laws.  I am open to seeing the people of New York replace this guy in the next election.

Views: 12

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

There are already over 200 gun laws on the books.  Why don't you, David, understand that murderers & criminals do not care about any kind of laws and do not abide by them.  It is already illegal to murder people!  More laws only stifle the law abiding citizens.  Get a clue!

AMEN !!! gun control laws are nothing but a pain in everybody's posterior .... a law abiding citizen doesn't need them and , a criminal will just ignore them .... what's the point ? the Constitution gives us the right to bear arms , to protect ourselves and our families , not to mention our property , for which we are prosecuted if we use deadly force ( we violate the criminal's rights to steal our property , just as the government does ( they hate competition )) gun control means being able to hit your target
????????? Seriously what the hell is wrong with these clowns we call leaders?!?!?!?! All this will do is stop someone from saving a congress person from being killed! If I were there and this law was on the books instead of putting a bullet in Loughner's head to attempt to save the lives of others I would run!!!  If this clown is successful which he most likely will be "all of congress these days seems stupid enough to not get it" this will cause nothing but problems and will never stop anyone hell bent on hurting a member of congress or any politition for that matter! Why are they so ignorantly stupid?!?!?

I keep a 44 magnum under the truck seat .Every day I put my cell phone on the left side of my belt , a  Ruger on my right . A tee shirt covers the Ruger. No one in public ever see's them. I have a concealed carry permit . I have carried a concealed pistol since the late 70's. I have experience , nerve , reserve and integrity .The lack of a police record reflects my character . I just may be the brave guy that saves your life when some lunitic shoots at you in a crowded store , Except if you are within 1000 feet of a Member of congress.... I obey laws . That is why I have a carry permit .   Peter King is an idiot.    

Pray to God that He deliver us from the lunicy that has been the underlying cause that has led to the distruction of every Nation and Civilization since the beginning of Our Time on Mother Earth. May He show mercy on us all.

David;  We the SHEEPle have silently allowed a tiny minority of enemies to all-but-banish Yahweh/God from OUR America.   Kick Him out, His blessings go with...

 

Read Deut. 17:15 & 28:43   Insane Hussein and his anti-American Socialist's have just begun...   Pray

I guess it sounded good to him. Lol If this law goes into effect..its just the beginning of the rest of the "control" that will follow....and I, will be one of the MANY that has left the State of NY BECAUSE of it.
Like with virtually every other capital crime committed since the invention of gunpowder, the problem is not the abundance of guns, it's the absence of guns.  One armed and well trained citizen could have stopped that massacre within seconds of its start with far less loss of life.  Arm all law-abiding citizens and the crime rate will plummet overnight.  Had there been a few concealed-carry Tea Partiers present the outcome would no doubt have been vastly different.  As old west cowboy Teddy Blue Abbot observed, an armed society is a polite society, with most everyone saying "Please" and "Thank You".  I've traveled to NY on business and find it hard to believe that there's enough idiots there to elect people like King to office.  But then I'm from Idaho and can't believe that the likes of  Bloomberg, Schumer, Clinton, Frank, the Kennedy's, etc., could get elected dog catcher in any state.       

Keith:

You can not judge many by a few.

This is ridiculous! The security would be intended for the political figures only...what about the rest off the crowd of supporters at these rally's? Like that sweet little 9 year old? I for one would love to know that Many an American there would protect the people around them...or would you rather (ex:...the death count like in Fort Bragg where their guns were securely packed elsewhere), depend on the cops...who would be given 100 people per cop to try to oversee/protect? I think not. I'd feel a hell of a lot saver with the guy with the magnum standing next to me. I don't like the thought of giving one hundred percent of my personal safety over to sparse Law enforcement.

"Cars" kill 25000 people every year.

 

So, we should outlaw cars!

 

How many people does cancer kill every year?

 

Nancy Pelosi, using her powerful Congress would have "outlawed" cancer, if she had still been in power.

 

Her way of solving the Overweight Problem in Children would be to order that the Law of Gravity's formula should be reduced by 20 percent. That would instantly reduce the overweight children's weight by 20 percent.

 

Watch your local TV news, especially MSNBC. They have a whole bunch of great ideas to solve all the world's problems.

If someone is hell bent on murdering someone, a simple ball point pen would do the job if used correctly.  Perhaps we should ban those within 1000 feet also.

RSS

Tea Party Nation is a social network

 






© 2013   Created by Judson Phillips.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service