Real Time Analytics


 


 

 

 

There is an inconvenient truth Mitt Romney would like conservatives and Republicans to forget.   He was the inspiration for Obamacare and the individual mandate came straight from Romneycare.

 

Ron Suskind has a new book out, called “Confidence men.”  It is about the Obama regime and goes into some detail about the origins of the individual mandate.

 

From the Daily Caller:

 

Suskind goes on to demonstrate that President Obama, who previously had not embraced the individual mandate, was impressed by RomneyCare’s impact in Massachusetts:

“… the centerpiece of that program, the individual mandate, was something Obama had drawn up short of endorsing during the campaign, much to the ire of Hillary Clinton, who called him ‘all talk, no action’ on health care. Now, DeParle, in her memo, stressed that Obama should embrace a plan much like that in Massachusetts, driven by the teeth of a mandate, where individuals would be fined for not having health insurance. Obama, never much for the mandate, was concerned about legal challenges to it but was impressed by DeParle’s coverage numbers. Without the mandate, the still-sketchy Obama plan would leave twenty-eight million Americans uninsured; with the mandate, the estimates of the number left uninsured were well below ten million.” (p. 262-263)

It’s no big secret that Obama looked to RomneyCare to craft his plan. But this book may also serve to remind everyone of what is obviously an inconvenient truth for Mitt Romney.

 

 

For conservatives this is important because we need a conservative to get the nomination and Romney is not a conservative.

 

 

From Fox News:

 

The upcoming Fox News/Google debate Thursday in Florida comes at a time when growing numbers of voters are becoming so frustrated with President Obama they are vowing to vote against him. But, as demonstrated in a new national poll out Wednesday, Americans are still far more interested in voting against Obama than voting for anybody in the current Republican field. 

At the debate, the candidates will have a chance to reveal that political X factor -- the quality that makes them not just competitive, but presidential. But while the right candidate may already be on stage, polls suggest voters haven't fallen in love with anybody yet. 

 

 This election is going to be the ABO election.  Anyone but Obama.  The Republican primary needs to be ABR.   Anyone but Romney. 

 

If Romney is elected, all we will have is a Republican manager of big government.  The size of government will not be reduced and what Obama has implemented will become permanent.   We need to make our choice:  Perry, or Bachman, or Gingrich or Cain.  Any of them is better than Romney.

Views: 1106

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Something to think about.
On top of  all this, Romney refuses to promise to repeal ObamaCare. Romney has said repeatedly in recent debates that if elected President, he would give all 50 states a waiver from ObamaCare. This is not enough, not by a long shot, because it leaves ObamaCare still standing as the law of the land. To the best of my knowledge, ALL of the Republican candidates, except Romney (and possibly Huntsman, but he has virtually zero support and will have to drop out soon), have pledged to repeal ObamaCare, if Congress puts such a bill on their desk (we have to remember that we also have to have both houses of Congress as well, in order for a bill to repeal ObamaCare to actually end up on the President's desk). We cannot count on Romney to sign a repeal of ObamaCare; he publicly admits he just won't do it. This is a knock-out question for me, regarding anyone who wants my vote for President next year. I have never supported Romney, and this is one of the reasons why. All the other candidates mentioned by Judson in the blog, Perry, Cain, Bachmann, and Gingrich, have all pledged publicly to repeal ObamaCare. Of these people, my personal choice is Perry. There is a big difference between merely granting a waiver to the law (while leaving the law intact and standing) and repealing the law! We need to choose someone committed to the repeal of ObamaCare to be the Republican nominee.
How about repealing everything that has been done in the last two and one-half years.
Norma, sounds great! I just mentioned ObamaCare because that's what the blog was about. But, by all means, get rid of everything Obummer has done!
No-no-no- no-no NO-O-O. Dammit. Haven't you people learned yet that dealing with the left wing of the totalitarian party is no better than dealing with the right wing of totalitarian party. You are getting more of the same with these empty suits of the District of Corruption. Ron Paul, as much as a simpleton you cliam him to be is the O-N-L-Y hope of this nation surviving!
I know the guy is sincere, and i know you are too, but RP just comes off as Kooky... he has the edge of Ross Perot surrounding him. I dont feel one ounce of trust for R. Paul. Sorry.

Dear Geoff..........do you really think it's okay for Iran to have nuclear capabilities??  REALLY????  Do you not believe a man when he says he wants to wipe a few countries off the face of the Earth??  REALLY???  I like Ron Paul, but he is dangerous when he speaks about just letting Iran do what ever it wants.  It is irresponsible talk, and he needs to stop.

I would vote for him. ABO.
Geoff, I've dropped Perry from my short list and now it' down to Michelle Bachmann and Ron Paul. Their both speaking my language on the constitution and reducing the size and control of Government.
WELL,YOU CAN COUNT ON ME "NOT TO VOTE FOR ROMNEY"!! SAME WITH OUR NOW PRESENT DICTATOR--NO VOTE FOR HIM!!
You  are  Mad...
Being  funny,  and  no  I  don't  like  Gingrich...he's another   Rino...Cain  or  Rubio, I need  to learn  more...I  am  so  far  not  impressed  by Cain.... 

RSS

Tea Party Nation is a social network

 






© 2013   Created by Judson Phillips.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service