Newt Gingrich: GodFather of the Tea Party Movement?

Longtime followers of the Tea Party movement have seen numerous claims that this movement was started in 2007 by Ron Paul. A video of a "Money Bomb" event is offered as proof, showing a supporter's sign, containing the words "Tea Party"

   Those who organized the original events  in early in 2009, have understandably protested this as an attempt to hijack the movement.
   Now, photographic evidence pushes the time back....and demonstrates the revival of the Tea Party Protest approach  to perhaps be Newt, certainly not Ron Paul!
Newt was always a Tea Partier, as seen on April 15, 1994 in Georgia:.
 
Unlike Ron Paul, Newt Gingrich actually created the "props", had the idea himself, and forged the program  3 years before Paul laid claim to it.

It's  well documented really!

See the article entitled 

Newt Gingrich: Prop Comic

at the




Many Ron Paul partisans will continue to to spew this and other false information, in the face of historic facts. Honest historical analysis could be important, given a possible alliance between Paul and Romney.

Faithful Paul supporters are adamant, however! And have a set of talking points that will be put forth anywhere and everywhere, ad nauseum. The following video parody entitled  Talking with a Ron Paul Supporter2 provides an entertaining compilation of talking points. Study this video carefully. You will then understand the primary RP positions, all in one quick lesson!



So, what think  you?

Which of the candidates has the better claim as founder of the Tea Party Movement?
Which candidates supporters are most unreasonable?

Does this video miss any major Ron Paul talking points?

(We want to cover them all in one shot, you know!)

Tags: Bilderberger, Constitutionalist, One World Order, Party, Paul, Ron, Tea, lizard people

Views: 1856

▶ Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Permalink Reply by ART on March 19, 2012 at 9:43am

he needs a SC debate performance again, but I don't see it happening. I will NOT vote for Santorum however..  leaving Mitt.

Permalink Reply by Ed Ghiglieri on March 19, 2012 at 9:44am

Whoever founded it is not important.  What is interesting though is that most Americans support big gov't.  I'm one of the few that don't.  BTW, Newt is an advocate of a thumb print database for gun owners. 

I would love to learn how to educate folks about what the Founders wanted.  I was told the other day that the Pledge of Allegiance, Social Security, MediCare and MedicAid are in the Constitution.  When I handed the couple a copy of the document they could not find it.  The socialism we have now goes back quite a ways, about a hundred years now.

Permalink Reply by Gail Hartel on March 19, 2012 at 9:47am

There is so much BS about Newt its hard to tell truth from fiction.  Most truths have been turned into misinformation.  Newt is the only one I trust to out debate the CamPAINer in Chief, his Holinuts.  He may or may not be big g'ment, but at least he has ideas about how to get us OUT of this mess we're in, not further crisis or hostile takeover by the non-military peacekeepers he is organizing.  Why is the media not discussing his latest executive order?

Permalink Reply by Carol Williams on March 19, 2012 at 11:42am

Gail, here's some truth from a variety of sources:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w9zgQmez1J0&feature=youtu.be

Permalink Reply by Agi Yaeger on March 19, 2012 at 12:09pm

Carol, great sound bytes on Newt, short and to the point. However, all the naysayers here, wouldn't bother even viewing it.

After all these months, they still say the same thing. It's clear that we are not talking to them.

Permalink Reply by Vern Shotwell on March 20, 2012 at 7:17am

You are right Carol! It's a great video.Those in a position to know, and are not invested in maintaining the massive spending status quo are for Newt! I hope that all would watch at least this  2 minute clip!

It's important, and informative !

Permalink Reply by Gary L Hastriter on March 20, 2012 at 10:41am

Vern, Its too bad that every voter can't watch this video. I've sent it to my nearly 100 e-mail addresses.

If Newt loses out in this race, I'd like to have him put together a study course that every politician running for any office would have to take and pass before filing for the office.

It would certainly limit the amount of politicians we have now and would clean up the slate for the future.

At the present time, "Ignorance is Bliss".

Permalink Reply by Kristin Fecteau on March 19, 2012 at 9:51am
I wonder how Newt's idea of increasing the size of the State Department by 50% fits in with TeaParty small government ideals? http://www.buzzfeed.com/andrewkaczynski/newt-gingrich-increase-the-...
Permalink Reply by Kristin Fecteau on March 19, 2012 at 10:42am
So? How is that smaller government, and is that what he meant when he said this? No!
Permalink Reply by Kristin Fecteau on March 19, 2012 at 11:07am

You haven't answered the question. Was THAT Newt's intent when he made this statement (on video, so you can't deny it), that it was in regard to intelligence?

Permalink Reply by JOHN DELASAUX on March 19, 2012 at 2:46pm

Gee, simmer down, Kristin.

When we say "smaller government", we don't mean that EVERY DEPARTMENT must ALWAYS  be smaller in EVERY SITUATION that the country finds itself in.

If there were 100 forest fires set by terrorists next year, FEMA and the fire fighters might have to be bigger to take care of it.

If Newt was able to balance the budget and create a surplus to pay off some National Debt, why are you so set on blasting him? 

The purpose of wanting smaller goverment is to REDUCE TAXES and REDUCE SPENDING, not to cut services which are necessary.

If someone can give us more services for less taxes, what are you opposed to about that?

Permalink Reply by Carol Williams on March 19, 2012 at 11:10am

Kristin, are you even listening to yourself? You come in here with what you consider to be a "gotcha" which turns out to be not a gotcha at all and expect that to carry weight. And now this flippant reply to a very legitimate observation. Are you really saying that we need a reduced State Dept and reduced CIA capabilities? Are you really against Reagan's philosophy of Peace Through Strength?

Why don't you just tell us what your guy says about the State Dept? I'm sure it would be so dazzling it would make Santorum supporters of all of us.

RSS

Tea Party Nation is a social network

 



© 2013   Created by Judson Phillips.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service

Sign in to chat!