Name Names!
Mitt Romney or as we like to call him, Mitt the Cowardly liberal, is still lying to the American people and the Republicans in particular.
Yes, there are a lot of lies, but there is one in particular that is worth mentioning.
Which one is it?
Mitt the cowardly liberal claims he has Tea Party support and has support from prominent Tea Party leaders.
Really?
This started when I appeared MSNBC on Monday, on Martin Bashir’s show. I stated Tea Partiers would not support Mitt Romney. Romney claimed on the Laura Ingraham show that he had the support of prominent Tea Party leaders.
Really?
Who?
The answer is, he does not have the support of any significant Tea Party group or leader.
Why?
Mitt Romney is a liberal. Mitt Romney is simply John McCain 2.0. Mitt Romney, if elected will advance a liberal agenda.
Mitt Romney has ignored the Tea Party. His theory is simple. He does not need us. He will give the Tea Party lip service, just because any good politician does not go out of his way to antagonize a voting block.
For liberals, Romney is the candidate they most want to face. The Tea Party movement at best will be lukewarm behind him and at worst many of us will simply pass on the Presidential race to concentrate on Senate and House races. In previous polls, between one third and one half of Tea Party members surveyed said they would not vote for Romney in the general election.
(See our new Tea Party Nation Poll: Will you vote for Mitt Romney?)
Mitt Romney, like many politicians, simply says things and expects us to accept those statements as gospel, even if they fly in the face of the facts.
The fact is Mitt Romney has no major Tea Party support. No significant Tea Party figure has endorsed the liberal former Massachusetts governor.
The reason is the Tea Party does not support liberals.
Another statement Mitt Romney floats out that he expects us to blindly accept is that he is a conservative. That is one of the most laughable statements in history. If false statements could get you disqualified from running, Mitt would immediately be voted off the island for that whopper.
The truth of the matter is that Mitt Romney was a very liberal Massachusetts governor. He claims some of his liberal decisions were necessary because he had to run in a very liberal state. What Romney does not say, most of his most liberal decisions were made after he announced he was not running for reelection. He signed Romneycare after he was a lame duck. He enacted cap and trade when he was a lame duck. He could have just said I’m not enacting any of these laws and not had to worry about it because he was not going to run for reelection.
Instead, he pushed Massachusetts even further to the left.
Now, in New Hampshire, another liberal Republican, John McCain is going to endorse Mitt Romney. McCain pretty much tanked the GOP four years ago. Why does anyone care what McCain thinks? In fact, McCain’s endorsement is just another good reason not to vote for Mitt Romney, the liberal from Massachusetts.
So who endorses Mitt Romney? Liberals? Where are the Tea Party supporters he claims support him? Like his claims of a conservative record, they are a figment of his imagination.
Tags: conservatives, john, liberal, mccain, mitt, romney, splitting, votes
Replies to This Discussion
-
Permalink Reply by Larry Self on -
I am supporting Newt Gingrich.
I will support the Republican nominee, period!!!
YES, even Mitt Romney or Ron Paul. Enthusiastically even, though it will take time to work it up. Oh the shock of it! Look, I prefer taking a chance with the nutty uncle to evil clothed in "Progressivism". I will not sit at home and allow evil to flourish while I am breathing. Please consider toning down the rhetoric toward other competitors and focus more on comparing and contrasting which is the game plan Newt is gearing up for. Against all the competitors we should heed Sarah Palin's advice: "the GOP had better not marginalize Ron Paul and his supporters after tonight because their fiscal concerns are very legitimate and the GOP had better work with them".
I fear our US Constitution and her Bill of Rights will not survive another term of Obamalinsky.
-
Permalink Reply by Barry Gabrielson on -
The choice is going to be between Romney and the Fraud in the Oval office destroying this nation, plain and simple.
4 more years of this socialist/marxist pig will, yes will destroy this nation. I will select Romney before this fraud any time, any day, any where. No other candidate have a chance to beat this fraud. We need a new Speaker of the House, a person with a spine, same with the Senate. If we can take Congress, place fiscal conservatives in leadership positions, remove this toxic frauds in this adminstration, this nation has a chance at recovering.
-
Permalink Reply by Jim Delaney on
-
IF--and it's a big IF--RINO Romney snags the nomination, my guess is that he will lose to Obama, our Campaigner-in-Chief. In that case, our only hope is if the Senate and House is firmly in GOP hands which will enable us to at least slow the socialist transformation. Short of that, secession should be seriously considered. I have no intention of surrendering my family to state control.
Finally, with each passing day Gingrich looks more and more appealing. The GOP establishment loathes him, and for that reason alone I'm supporting him.
-
Permalink Reply by Thomas Nunn on
-
"many of us will simply pass on the Presidential race to concentrate on Senate and House races">
While I don't advise passing the presidential election, we shouldn't forget that if we elect enough conservatives in the House and Senate, we can still control the Government, even to an override of any veto by a RINO president,
If that is what the country elects.
Maybe even some Representatives who have the courage to challenge Obama's eligibility/administration, if he were to be reelected.
Electing the right president would solve a lot of problems, but it's not the only ballgame in town.
-
Permalink Reply by Raymond Greenway on -
In the past I held my nose and voted for Bush I, Bob Dole, Bush II re-election, and finally McCain. If either Mitt Rommey or Ron Paul get the nod, I will not vote for either of them.
-
Permalink Reply by Darwin Rockantansky on -
One more vote for Obama?
Personally, I would vote for Ron Paul over Obama; a quick and less painful death of our nation vs a longer protracted death of our nation.
-
Permalink Reply by Meredith on
-
I am beyond disatisfied with the lobbyists controlling the election. Mitt Romney has a chance to win only because he has millions in funds from lobbyists and interest groups, not because he is qualified true Conservative. Voting for the lesser evil is getting old.
-
Permalink Reply by Debbie Warren on
-
When you hold your nose and vote; you support the cabal. When you donate a single dime to either Party; you give them the money and the power. When you put your support behind one of these folks before the facts come out about them, you are putting the cart before the horse. We are not going to fix our problems with one election or even two more. But we can be more in charge of our fate and our money.
I truly wish more Americans would not jump into the water so early in the game. I wish they would realize who has the ultimate power. There are more of us than there are of them.
We would be better off focusing on the exposure and prosecution of the criminals in government, letting the dominoes fall and then picking our lobsters. Rather than dance to their tune; we would be better off writing our own script and storming the citadel before falling in line as dutiful little voters.
WE put Scott Brown in office based on a belief that he was our guy. It was a good thing because we proved we could upset the Kennedy apple cart and put a Republican in there. But, the turncoat RINO jackass took the resources given him and started promoting McAmnesty as soon as he had won the seat. Palin joined the effort as well. But both waited until Brown was elected before exposing their support for McCain. The deceit from both was disgusting and unforgivable because they knew how Conservatives felt about McCain and supported him anyway.
I voted for Bush Sr. and Jr. with a solid belief in both of them. I defended both. It was a sad day when I had to finally see what traitors they both are and how entrenched the Bush family is in the New World Order and the installation of the current White House squatter who clearly is there illegally.
-
Permalink Reply by Hector Torres on
-
Be aware that if it gets down to voting for Romney, he may be able to fix the financial side of our problems but when it comes to our Republic, he probably will place the last nails on the destruction of our Constitution and our way of life. Some of the states that use the Constitution for toilet paper; Illinois,(the biggest transgressor), Massachusets, California & Puerto Rico(territory). By the way, anybody knows what is the penalty for disregarding the Constitution ? Ive looked everywhere and I can't seem to find how it will be enforced(other than going to court or revolution). Help me out please.
-
Permalink Reply by Mary Todd on
-
I will be one who will sit out if Romney wins the nomination....Sorry, but I actually believe he will do as much or more damage then Obama...with Obama we know what to expect..I am one who stands by "better the enemy we know".....and I live in Tennessee , very conservative Williamson County....and I have heard "many" people who will not vote for romney because he is a Mormon....
-
Permalink Reply by Larry Self on
-
If you (and your "many" people) are so bold to say this, are you bold enough to place stickers on your car and home that say "I DID NOT VOTE FOR ROMNEY"? This will let your neighbors know who helped reelect Obamalinsky.
I know the pill will be tough, but your country needs you to take the awful tasting medicine even if it is a "generic".
-
Permalink Reply by james stamulis on -
so you would rather us keep heading toward communism than vote for romney? i hate romney but i will never vote for obama who is the opposite of what he says he is.
© 2013 Created by Judson Phillips.
