Okay, we all know liberals are pretty nutty but there are a couple of examples today that really go over the top.
First, in New Hampshire, a mother tried to prime her kid to get Rick Perrry in a gotcha moment. Unfortunately for her, there was a camera right behind her.
Immediately afterwards, Jon Huntsman had to grab for attention, tweeting "I believe in evolution." Not that anyone really cares what Huntsman has to say.
Actually, we can call you a liberal. The meaning is about the same.
Then, there is everyone's favorite liberal lunatic Jeanane Garofalo saying she thinks Herman Cain is being paid to run. Can someone explain why anyone pays attention to her? She was on Keith Olberman's show, so three people got to see this live.
Releasing America's fossil fuel potential off shore, in the Rockies, and in Alaska would emasculate OPEC and oil prices would plummet! Bring it!
It truly is a matter of supply and demand. Even perceived supply. Bush opened a large area to EXPLORATION and the prices went down! I just attended a Cain rally in Lexington, SC. You really need to listen to what he has to say. VERY impressive! And, while he is too much a gentleman to say it. Who will call him racist?
"because there's not much she or Congress can do to lower gas prices."
mr. m this one is easy. if an american president went on record just 'intimating' that the u.s. was going
to open both coasts and 'anwar' to full commercial exploration and production the saudis would panic,
and we could negotiate a lower intermediate price per barrel. and if we actually did utilize our domestic
In recent years, Ms. Garofalo thought anyone who said anything against Obama was racist. So, if she speaks out against Herman Cain, doesn't that make her a racist by her standards? Both clips show just how hypocritical the left is. Had this been a tea party member attempting to have their child ask a "gottcha" question, this would have been front page news. So, yes, things like this must be shown and brought to the forefront so that people can see first hand and be reminded of the hypocrisy of the liberals in this Country.
What I object to is that liberals keep advancing one side in a philosophic argument and trying to persuade the public that those on the other side are yahoos who are against scientific advancement. It doesn't help that many scientists are ignorant of the philosophy of science. The public reads Hawkins' book without considering that this is a very sick man whose views are as much driven by emotion as
the most manic Holy Roller. Liberals proceed regularly from the argument from authority, and then turn around and attack evangelicals etc. for doing the same. The public may hear stuff about " string theory"on "the Big Bang," and not know how totally hypothetical it is, and how driven it is by people are are determined--like Thomas Huxley--to kill God.
Very well said! I loved reading Carl Sagan's book Cosmos when I was a kid, but even at that age I noticed his preoccupation with trying to convince the reader that God did not exist. He would make anti-God statements in the book that just didn't really relate to the scientific topic. Stephen J. Gould did EXACTLY the same thing in his books. Dawkins is the same. Their obvious agenda is not science at all; I believe they are driven by the "spirit of antichrist" that John talked about in the Bible. Some people just have an irrational, rabid, intense hatred of all things Christian, to the point where it doesn't even make sense. Why should they care? If they believe in nothing, then why should they care what anyone else believes, since it makes no difference anyway?
It is with some sorrow that I must take umbrage with the Title of this discussion, sir.That title being "Liberals going nuts"
Inherent in said title are 2 suppositions:
Please provide data, measuring systems or other documentation. I would propose that all Liberals have deserved housing in the mental care units for decades, suffering from various mental incapacitation(s).
Thank you in advance for additional forthcoming information.
Vern Shotwell, esq.