Here’s something interesting that has popped up. According to reports, the on going investigation of the “Millionaire Madam” now shows that one of her clients may have been John Edwards.
From the Huffington Post:
A call girl working for alleged "Millionaire Madam" Anna Gristina told investigators she was paid to have sex with former U.S. Sen. John Edwards when he was in New York raising money for his failed presidential bid, DNAinfo has learned.
Edwards is the first big name to surface in connection to Gristina's alleged prostitution scheme run out of an Upper East Side apartment.
His lawyers were contacted by DNAinfo, but did not comment.
According to “On The Inside” sources, Edwards allegedly hooked up with one of Gristina’s high-end hookers in 2007 when the dashing pol from North Carolina brought his then high-flying presidential campaign to the Big Apple.
The one-night fling allegedly took place at an Upper East Side hotel suite and was arranged by an aide with help from a New Yorker familiar with Gristina’s prostitution ring, sources said.
The prostitute claiming to have slept with Edwards provided a detailed, first-hand account of their encounter to investigators in the Manhattan District Attorney's office in 2008 after they began probing Gristina’s operation, sources said.
While the account does not say when in 2008 the information was reported to the District Attorney’s office, but there is a good chance it was while Edwards was running for President.
Does anyone really believe that if this were a Republican, this information would have remained under the radar until now?
The District Attorney in Manhatten at the time was a Democrat. So is this a case of Democrats protecting Democrats. Gee, that has never happened before, right.
Perhaps a more interesting question would be when did the media first find out about this story?
In 2008, the New York Times claimed with absolutely no proof that John McCain was having an affair with a female lobbyist. The Times was eventually sued and settled the case. When did the Times get wind of this story and did they spike it?
Inquiring minds want to know.
What can one say? I'm amazed that the HuffPost released it!
What can one say? Well, I can say that I find it interesting that anyone wants to perpetuate a story of the past indiscretions of a politician who is essentially out of power and no longer viable when we have a plethora of the despicable types still in power and affecting our lives on a daily basis. It's a diversion, folks. Just like the birth certificate is.
What part of the rather substantial proof, offered by forensic document experts, about the fake birth certificate did you not believe or understand? Or maybe it's the fake Selective Service registration.
How about the part where the Constitution requires the President to be a "natural born citizen" that's been defined as someone born of two parents who are both U.S. citizens at the time of the child's birth? (FYI Obama's father was a British citizen when Obama Jr. was born.
You are right about one thing. There are plenty of despicable types still in power and Obama leads the list.
Right on, Cali. I replied the same sentiments under this very same post and it was removed. Obama's eligibility is not a diversion, it's at the very heart of our problems.
I can understand getting censored by the left, but TPN?
TPN has NOT censored the BC story and in fact, Judson has blogged about and allowed blogs to be posted on this site about it.
No, I don't believe Judson would. Someone removed my remark. It was right where Vern Shotwell's reply is now, and it was removed about the same time.
Doesn't take a genius. Vern went so far as to compare me to Alinsky just because I've let it be known I believe Newt is a progressive.
Careful, David. Exposing Newt's real politics will get you ostracized in this neck of the woods. You'd be called a liar even if you were to post a video of Newt himself saying, "I'm a globalist, Wilsonian, FDR worshiping progressive".
Indeed, Phil you may be ostracized for again claiming that a candidate says things not said! Why, somebody might believe such Alinsky tactyics
And you will be ostracized for again violating the TOS. The terms "misleading, deceptive", and particularly "libelous or defamatory" come to the fore.
Sound like a warning? You betcha!
Ah, Vern. Once again, you have cut me to the quick.
Since you know so little about me, allow me to introduce myself. I am a happily married, heterosexual white Christian male, and proud to be a direct descendant of those who shed blood in the Revolutionary War. I served 10 years in the Navy and am happy to say Ronald Reagan was my first Commander-In-Chief. I am a conservative who believes in limited government. I believe the Founding Fathers and Framers of the Constitution were not perfect, but as a whole were led of God when they based the Constitution on the Declaration of Independence. I believe America is exceptional because our Republic was founded on the Laws of Nature and Nature's God. I believe that's why America was so blessed for so long. I believe the current administration is waging all-out war against these principles of American Freedom and Liberty.
I believe the Founding Fathers would roll over in their graves at the very thought of the four front runners we have going up against Obama. I don't care for Santorum because of his big-government history. I support him simply because I believe he is the most conservative horse left in the race.
I care not about your warnings, Vern. I care not about being ostracized for exposing what I believe to be true. I care not that you call direct quotes and videos of someone saying things out of their own mouth ' "misleading, deceptive", and particularly "libelous or defamatory" '. What has cut me to the quick, Sir, is being compared to Alinsky. This is the second time you have done this to me.
Saul Alinsky - a Marxist, Communist radical, indirect mentor of our Charlatan-In-Chief, and one partly responsible for the current declining state of affairs, represents everything I, as a freedom loving, God fearing Patriot, detest and abhor
Yes, agreed, Glenn Beck has exposed Newt as being a conservative and in my opinion, that is what tanked Newt's chances. Glenn went after him hard right when Newt was rising up in the polls.
Anyway, my point was about the BC, and Judson has let it be known that he believes the BC that has produced is fake and has allowed blogs to be posted here about eligibility.
One thing we need to do is quit being nice and go after the OBAMA Throat.
Fight fire with fire.
Obama is a liar, his BC if fake, his Slective Service card is a botched data stamp foregery and it is quite visible.
Plenty on WND about it.
We are either going to be sheeple, or we are going to be Patriotic Warriors.
Many of us will go down fighting.
And, if you think SORROS is Obama's puppet master, think again. Most probably it is BUSH the Republican and Obama was a CIA grunt under his control while he was the CIA Director. Obama built and created by Bush Sr, then Obama went Rogue to replace the Bush Socialist Movement with the OBAMA Muslim movement. Both movements are a bunch of crap. And we are already it it knee deep. I can even smell Washington from Florida.