Real Time Analytics



The conservative victory of November 2 has raised talk across the Internet of something that might have been unthinkable a few months ago.  That is the impeachment and removal of Barack Obama as President.

First, a couple of thoughts.  I consider the possibility of this happening very unlikely and I am totally committed to seeing a constitutional conservative sworn in as President on January 20, 2013.  

There are two parts to this possibility.  First is the impeachment of the President.  While unlikely, as I believe soon to be House Speaker John Boehner has zero interest in this, an impeachment is a possibility.  In order to impeach the President, the House Judiciary Committee must first consider articles of impeachment, which are then sent to the full House.  The House may vote for impeachment by a simple majority.   This is certainly possible, since the Republicans now control the House.

The impeachment is much like an indictment.  It alleges what the President has done wrong.  The matter then goes to the Senate where it takes a two-thirds majority to remove the President.

The common wisdom is that is impossible because not only to the Republicans not have two thirds, but also the Democrats actually control the Senate.

The conventional wisdom may be wrong.

An amazing editorial appeared in the pages of the Washington Post today.  Top Democratic operatives Douglas Shoen and Patrick Caddell called on Obama to announce immediately he is not running for reelection in 2012.   While Obama would never do that voluntarily, the fact that two top Democratic operatives called for this with two years left in his administration means the Democrats have come to a realization.  Obama cannot win 2012.

With Obama trailing every major GOP candidate, except Sarah Palin, in the polls, the Democrats are facing the prospect that in 2013, not only will the GOP control the House and the Senate; there will be a Republican in the White House again.  If you know anything about liberals, they do not voluntarily give up power. They live for power and for them to be totally shut out of power, for them, is the seventh circle of hell.

If the Republican House were to impeach Obama, would enough Democrats join in the vote to remove him as President?  Possibly.  If they were convinced he was absolutely doomed in 2012, they might.  

But for those who advocate Obama’s impeachment, you have to consider what would happen afterwards.  Biden would become President.  By the time an impeachment trial could be completed, we would be very close to the 2012 elections.  Biden could simply run as President, but denounce everything Obama did.  Would it work?  Who knows?  Four years ago, would anyone have believed Barack Obama would be the Forty Fourth President of the United States?

If Biden did not run for election, then the door would be opened for Hillary Clinton or any other number of Democrats who could separate themselves from the Obama regime’s record and run on their own.    If this happened and the Republican Party nominated a liberal, such as Mitt Romney, who at best does not inspire the Tea Party movement or who causes the Tea Party movement to totally bolt from the Republican Party, we could see a new, Democratic President in 2013 and we would see the chance to undo everything that Obama has done go down the drain.

The next two years will be perilous for the country and its citizens.  We need to navigate these treacherous waters with care and a lot of thought about what we do.

Views: 2

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Some one please tell me why no one is complaining about the takeover of America by Islam? they are our most dangerous enemy. Islam has pledged to over run America, convert it to the Islamic world order or kill us. every one who resists Islam, I have been suspended from two sites, for doing just that. And never implying one suggestion of any kind of violence.

God bless America ........ Pathfinder..........
Good answer, fortunateson. It is called staying "ON TOPIC".
Diverting attention from a discussion's current topic disrupts that discussion. That is not to say that the threat of Islamic goal of hegenomy is not real, but Charles' comment is in the wrong group. When good intetioned, serious people do not stick to the topic at hand, it is hard to see them as separate from disuptive "TROLLS" who work hard to disrupt the Tea Party's sharing of ideas.
Good reply Mr fortunateson, Lets do that. Sorry to intrude. Please pleas excuse this 80 year old man, who flew Air Force Planes in the late 50's in defense of America, and one of the first to study obamas life from child hood, and started trying to tell America that he was a Muslim and intended to "fundamentally" change America into an Islamic Nation and tat he hated white and black Americans who were Christians.

He said himself that he " got his solace, from hating whites".Remember, in one of his "great" speeches, that "we were no longer a Christian Nation"? The man couldn't even wait until it was elected. It was when it was a fact that he would become president. Not by "winning", but by "stilling" it.

We have George Soros to thank for that. Sorry for intruding, I want bother you all, again. Good luck, fellow Americans,. But do some searching. Don't take any ones word for any thing, even Mr fortunateson. Even though he is a Patriate.. God bless America, Pathfinder........................
A very sage and frightening comment.

I agree.
If Biden were to become President by Obama's impeachment, Pelosi would be next in line.

Would you really be able to stomach Pelosi, if some evil befell Biden?

Not a chance!

Let it go until 2012, when we can do the hatchet job on Obama correctly, at the ballot box.
Pelosi has lost her power, and she knows it.
I think he is totally unimpeachable. My argumentation and related reasoning can be found in the below link:

http://categoricallyunimpeachableman.blogspot.com/


Thank you!
Yes impeach him now ,prove he is not a citizen ,that will undo everything.( that will be a sure sign that God exist ). I SAY GO FOR IT.
Yes William I am with you. Start it now.
Would not efforts to impeach Obama hinder efforts to stop and repeal his and his party’s legislative stampede? The emphasis should now be on his and their past and current legislation agenda/intent accumulating any evidence along this legislative trail. A party that can find multiple definitions of is has the capacity to perform similar intrigue with their legislation.
The first route the incoming Republican congressmen need to take is the determination of Obama's actual eligibility. The house can force the issue, impeach the federal judges that have stonewalled it, bring charges against those of the Democratic leadership that permitted it, and bring Obama to trial under a number of charges sufficient to see him in Levenworth for the rest of his life, if not simply stood against the wall and blown away. If he is indeed ineligible, his removal from office would not require an impeachment. You cannot impeach someone for some reason that does not exist.
If, after a full and complete investigation inquiring into the eligibility status he is found to be eligible, there still will be all kinds of elements revealed as to why he is so adament against revealing his past that can get him stuck for a few life sentences.
Beyond that, there is sufficient evidence to try him for treason. If he is eligible, he is a citizen and CAN be tried for treason. Up against the wall. If he is ineligible, then he is not a citizen and can be tried for war crimes against the United States and its citizens; up against the wall.
Any way you look at it, the slimy bastard is the worst single enemy (from within or without) that the United States has faced in her entire 130+ year history and needs to be put up against the wall.
Call, email, write, and fax (not just your) your congressman and your senators (but every damned one of them) and insist on it. If they get enough of these messages (and despite their in-house censorers of your demands), even the gross rank-out chicken poop Democrats will listen—even Pelosi and Reid and Weenie Frank!
With that kind of an atmosphere in Washington, even the stupidest of the Liberals would have sense enough to back off and allow things to return to a more sensible level of political aspirations.
I'm sorry, but there is a distinct chance that the Supreme Court would not go along with your idea. Each law would have to be revoted in both houses of Congress and signed by a legitimate President

RSS

Tea Party Nation is a social network

 






© 2013   Created by Judson Phillips.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service