Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich has been trying for decades to rebuild his
image as the political, moral and religious conservative icon he once
claimed to
be, but which he betrayed in a series of arrogant missteps while Speaker
of the
House. In 1993 he carefully plotted his spectacular rise to power,
transitioning
almost seamlessly from liberal economics professor to champion of
conservative
values, with the help of an uncritical press. He had crafted a Contract
With
America to establish the facade of conservative leadership and then
promptly
shifted to pushing through passage of two globalist measures to
undermine US
sovereignty, NAAFTA and GAAT. He later even betrayed his morals and
marriage and
resigned early to evade even greater exposure to his growing list of
scandals.
I have previously predicted that Gingrich is the false conservative the
globalist kingmakers planned on running for president in 2012, just as
they
tried to foist a corrupt Rudolph Giuliani on Republican conservatives in
2008.
When that wouldn't fly they replaced Giuliani with an equally corrupt
and
controlled candidate: John McCain, a a solution purposefully destined to
fail
and get Obama elected. Knowing that a radical Obama presidency would
eventually
cause a swing back to the Right, Gingrich and the Powers That Be, who
control
both parties, are trying to position Gingrich to take advantage of the
strong
Tea Party movement which is still building in momentum as the
dissatisfaction
with Obama grows.
The Democratic party is clearly in trouble for the mid-term elections this
November. As Gary Langer for ABC News commented, "Increasingly
disenchanted with
President Obama's work on the stalled economy, registered voters by an
8-point
margin say they'd prefer to see the Republicans take control of Congress
- the
clearest sign yet of GOP opportunities and Democratic risks in the 2010
midterm
elections.
"A year and a half into his presidency, 51 percent in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll would rather have the Republicans run Congress
'to act
as a check on Obama's policies,' vs. 43 percent who want the Democrats
in charge
to help support those policies. That's accompanied by a 7-point,
one-month drop
in approval of Obama's handling of the economy, to a career low."
But here is a more interesting point: "While Democrats are most at risk, the
danger's not theirs alone. Registered voters by 62-26 percent are
inclined to
look around for someone new for Congress rather than to re-elect their
current
representative - the broadest anti-incumbency on record
in
ABC/Post polls since 1989. Backing for incumbents has lost 11 points
since
February, an unusually steep decline. There are other signs of raging
discontent: ABC's Frustration Index remains well in the
red
zone, at 67 on its scale of 0 to 100, right where it's been all year.
It's
reached higher just twice, likewise in times of deep economic trouble."
But the establish has seen this before and has developed an uncanny ability
to divert people from real change by promoting controlled candidates
that are
capable of selling people on a false string of hopes and promises and
just as
quickly betraying them. Obama as been a huge disappoint to both the Left
and the
independents who put him into office. Their new strategy for replacing
him is to
run a phony Republican conservative who will promise conservatives a
world of
change and outright reversal, but will not, in fact, overturn any of the
damaging programs rammed through Congress during Obama's tenure.
Gingrich is their man. With his slick, but disingenuous talk, he is the
perfect ploy to guide and deceive conservatives into change that won't
actually
happen. Listen to his rhetoric as reported by Mike Glover of the AP:
"'I've
never been this serious,' Gingrich said.... [and] predicted President
Barack
Obama would be a one-term president. Obama's poll numbers have dropped
below 50
percent, and Gingrich predicted they would continue to fall, making him
vulnerable in 2012 [true]."
However, I'm not completely sure Obama will only be a one-term president.
We'll be able to tell, I believe, by who the kingmakers (working through
the
controlled media) allow to win the Republican nomination. As I have
stated
before, they have to keep Romney out at all costs. Despite his excess
ambition
and desire to please the establishment, which makes him unreliable to
conservatives, he is not an insider and is smart enough to see the evils
of the
dark side of government if he were to occupy the White House. They can't
allow
that.
The last time that happened was when Ronald Reagan got into office despite
their attempts to defeat him in convention, and they had to control him
through
VP Bush and his staff. Even that didn't work completely and they had to
use an
assassination attempt to scare him and Nancy into compliance.
If the media steers the Republicans into handing Sarah Palin
the Republican nomination, I think that will be a sign they intend for
Obama to
win another term. The PTB could promote Palin (using the influence of
establishment controlled Fox News) if they want a Republican to hammer
during
the actual campaign. It would be relatively easy for the media to make a
spectacle of her, bringing out all the skeletons in her closet (her baby
switcheroo, and financial deals) and setting her up for a host of verbal
gaffes,
which is not hard to do. She is very dependent upon advisors, which are
all from
the establishment. The fact that the media is promoting her at every
opportunity
and treating her as some kind of political rock star is suspicious. They
certainly aren't doing it because the like her, but probably to satisfy
the
growing Tea Party discontent with a candidate that is very flawed. Palin
has
made several stupid moves already, like endorsing Senator John McCain's
reelection over a much more reliable primary challenger former US Rep JD
Hayworth.
An easily discreditable Palin would accrue to Obama's advantage and probably
allow Obama to be reelected. Whether or not the PTB need Obama another 4
years
depends upon how much bad law Obama can ram through Congress before the
end of
his first 4 years. If they get what they want (it looks like they will)
they can
switch back to the Republicans which are better at getting unthinking
conservatives to support more globalist wars of intervention. This
tactic,
together with using Team B (the Democrats) for passing extremely bad law
is a
terribly effective tactic to manipulate the voters even during turnover
elections. While I don't think Democrats will lose their majority in the
house
or Senate, they will lose a lot of seats in the mid-term
elections--including
perhaps both the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority
leader
Harry Reid, both in trouble for reelection.
USA Today noted that other Democrats are in trouble even in California, a
Democratic stronghold. "California Democratic senator Barbara boxer is
trailing
Republican challenger Carly Fiorina by 2 points--47% to 45%--in a new
Survey.
The same SurveyUSA poll shows Republican Meg Whitman leading Democrat
Jerry
Brown 46% to 39% in the California gubernatorial race." None of these
political
upsets, however, will threaten the insider's agenda. They made sure the
real
conservative challengers were defeated in the primaries.
Another interesting aspect surfaced that makes me wonder if the PTB are
actually trying to foment a Democratic defeat in November. Paul Kane of
the
Washington Post notes, "House Democrats are lashing out at the White
House,
venting long-suppressed anger over what they see as President Obama's
lukewarm
efforts to help them win reelection -- and accusing administration
officials of
undermining the party's chances of retaining the majority in November's
midterm
elections."
Let's return to Mike Glover's review of Gingrich [my comments in brackets]:
"Unlike President Bill Clinton, who rebounded from first-term problems
by
pushing for welfare reform and budget balancing changes that pleased
moderate
voters, Gingrich argued that Obama shows no inclination to move toward
the
center [Clinton was no centrist either, but a political chameleon
just
playing for advantage, like Gingrich-hence the false accolades from this
RINO
Republican].
"'He's not like Bill Clinton,' Gingrich said. 'Bill Clinton was an Arkansas,
Southern Baptist, sort of understood middle American. While he had some
Yale
overtones being liberal, the truth is Bill Clinton was quite happy to
move to
the right. [Absolutely false. Clinton was simply a puppet run by his
handlers. His religious pronouncements, and attendance at high profile
churches
with cameras clicking were all scripted. Gingrich's compliments are no
surprise.
He and Clinton are actually good friends, just as Clinton is very close
to the
Bush family-which should tell us something.]
"The former speaker, who [falsely] championed a family values
agenda, spearheaded efforts to impeach Clinton for perjury over his
affair with
White House intern Monica Lewinsky. Gingrich later admitted having an
extramarital affair of his own in 1998 with a former congressional aide,
Callista Bisek. He married Bisek after divorcing his second wife,
Marianne
[informing her when she was in the hospital--how crass!].
After leaving Congress, Gingrich created American Solutions for Winning the
Future, a tax-exempt organization that promotes conservative causes [He
also
wrote a book about "God in America" targeting the gullible mainstream
Christian
evangelical leaders with his pretensions of repentance and tactical
acknowledgments of God].
"Gingrich said he would to return several times this year to Iowa, where
precinct caucuses lead off the presidential nominating process. He said
he
planned to lay the groundwork for a campaign by working hard for
Republicans in
the midterm elections [essentially, promoting himself in the
process. The
Republican National Committee is helping out, telling up-and-coming
mainstream
"conservative" candidates that they need Gingrich to campaign for them.
This
ploy keeps Gingrich before conservative audiences and maintains his
image as a
top Republican leader. True conservative candidates for Congress
remember his
previous betrayal and are embarrassed to have Gingrich speaking on their
behalf].
"Thanks to Obama's performance, Gingrich said he expected that whoever wins
the Republican nomination would win the White House." That would only be
true if
the PTB have approved the Republican candidate. If not one of their own,
Obama
will be given another 4 years.
The other way the PTB keep Republican backlash in check is by making sure
that there are enough liberal Republicans elected who will side with the
Democrats from time to time to make sure the reversals always fail by
just a few
votes. False Republican Presidents can thus maintain the illusion that
it
"wasn't their fault that change wasn't forthcoming."
The media will always beat the drum of compromise and moderation when a
Republican is in office, but no such pressure is placed on Democrats
when they
rule. We notice that these same liberal Republicans even helped tip the
Democratic agenda this week. The notorious Financial Reform bill passed
the
Senate with the help of 4 RINO Republicans: Ben Nelson of Nebraska,
Scott Brown
of Massachusetts and the "Twin Women Libs" from Maine, Senators Olympia
Snow and
Susan Collins. The legislation was short of Yes votes after Democratic
Sen.
Robert Byrd (WV) died. The PTB were pushing hard to have the W. Virginia
governor name a replacement by Friday, but this proved unnecessary as
the
liberal (always called "moderate") Republicans betrayed their party.
MORT ZUCHERMAN'S CON JOB
Another political chameleon, publisher Mort Zucherman has been takingTags: Be, Choice, Have, How, It, Our, People????, Powers, The, To, More…
© 2013 Created by Judson Phillips.
