Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham: Palin's Not Electable
Last night, Ann Coulter was a guest on the O'Reilly Factor with guest host, Laura Ingraham. During their exchange, the both seemed to agree that Sarah Palin was unelectable and pointed to her unfavorable rating among Republicans.
Ann Coulter also slipped in a zinger against Palin's supporters when she said, "I used to love Palin because of her enemies and now I dislike her because of her supporters."
What really gets me about these too is that they don't even like Rick Perry. Coulter goes after him on his immigration stance, but apparently they both love Romney and we all know how Coulter feels about New Jersey Governor Chris Christie.
Those two think moderates are great, but someone like Perry is bad because of his views on illegal immigration? Do they think Romney and Christie would be better?
I used to love Ann Coulter. I thought she was a female Rush Limbaugh. However, over the past two years, she has increasingly seemed like a pro-establishment moderate who is closer in thinking to John McCain, then Sarah Palin or Michelle Bachmann.
It would seem Laura Ingraham is in that boat as well.
Watch the video and let me know what you think.
Tags: ann, bachmann, chris, christie, coulter, ingraham, laura, michelle, mitt, palin, More…perry, rick, romney, sarah
Permalink Reply by Janet Wilkins on September 7, 2011 at 3:16pm Rookie on international stage-Goes for all frontrunners.
Questionable ethics record-say politician.
Lacks big agenda-Bingo!
Management experience-Bingo!
Etc.
She's got no comprehensive vision, she can't speak off the cuff and answer questions without sounding like a bimbo, has little real experience and is a quitter.
Permalink Reply by Mark Smithey on September 7, 2011 at 8:00pm
Permalink Reply by Janet Wilkins on September 21, 2011 at 2:41pm Yes. Talking about Sarah.
I lived in AK for many years and still work there each summer in our fishing operation.
Would go past their fishing site with our drift boat at times.
Ask most Alaskans.....she's a quitter and an embarrassment.
Nice person though. Enjoyed chatting.
Used to like to party on the beach between fishing periods before she got religion.
Permalink Reply by Lawrence Brown on September 21, 2011 at 3:03pm
Permalink Reply by Nora Simon on September 7, 2011 at 5:39pm Nearly all presidential candidates could be characterized as "rookie", regarding international affairs simply because international affairs are managed by those in the upper echelons of gov't. I certainly don't recall any junior Senators from Illinois having any international gravitas at the time he was elected and he still hasn't acquired even the thinnest veneer of it...if anything, he is regarded as inconsequential, if not an outright clown.
No, she doesn't have a "questionable" ethics record...the examples cited have long been debunked..
Sorry?...Who exactly, is it that sees Palin as more "reactionary" than "visionary"? And you say that like it's a bad thing---look at what a "visionary" has wreaked on the American economy, on the goodwill of our traditional allies, on our national security, etc.
Does a scant few years a state senator and a U.S. Senator, with no experience leading even a Scout troup, somehow fail to qualify as "slim management experience?
Maybe she should have had only two children and spent most of her free time on the golf course? JFK, btw, only had two surviving children.
Ah. tha lack of experience again...maybe she has "the good judgement" promised by a certain former junior Senator, in lieu of experience.
"Not a dymanic speaker"...she could always use a set of teleprompters, referring to "corpse men", 57 states, speaking in *Austrian*, and pepper her speeches with copious sprinklings of umm's ah's, er's in order to be considered a "dynamic" speaker. Frankly, who isn't sick of the stern professorial lectures of the last few years?
And, it's hard to take credibly a list of reasons that was compiled by the U.S News and World Report...isn't it?
Permalink Reply by Lawrence Brown on September 7, 2011 at 6:33pm
Permalink Reply by Barry W Gaugler on September 21, 2011 at 3:47pm Thank you Nora.
Janet,
I see that all residents of Alaska are going to receive a check for $1,174. So much for inexperience. How much are you getting back from the state you now live in? I wish I could be that embarrassed. Her quitting saved the taxpayers of Alaska millions in lawyer and court fees. I guess that is a bad thing in your play world? You used to drift by and party before she got religion? I understand she got religion at age nine. Were these real tea parties, with little cups and saucers and some imaginary friends? You talk about ethics and then put her down for religion? Where do you think ethics come from, if not from religion? Do they just fall out of the lobster traps? Sarah put away corruption in the state of Alaska and even after going through thousands of emails the liberal media only could find out that she was an honest and dedicated governor. I don't know how you can find fault with that unless you are absolutely without religion. I'm sad for you. Oh, by the way. It's not religion. It's a personal relationship with a risen saviour. His name is Yeshua the Messiah (Jesus Christ). I would suggest you seek him.
Permalink Reply by Fern Rivers on September 7, 2011 at 8:36pm Hey Ms Laura B'
AND how many people did you help elect in 2010 in order to get congress away from the democRATS/progressives?...AND Obama is so...intelligent AND so...willing to destroy our country. Unfortunately, it's people like you who will get Obummer reelected. The majority of us do not like RINOS. John McCain introduced Sarah to the country and without Sarah, McCain would have been left bleeding in the streets. She supported him out of loyalty and the other guy was not any better. As far as her ethics, she won every case of those fraudulent charges. You want another silver tongue...speaking like a snake with 2 teleprompters even when he speaks to 6 years old?...Please...your hate is showing...Obama is so intelligent...he still lives in 2008 in his 57+ States...Sorry...I thought that The Tea Party Nation was more understanding...lately, it seems that this site has way too many nay-sayers...we need to stay together if we want to win and just by bashing one candidate over another is certainly not going to help...Sarah Palin is NOT a Bimbo there Ms Janet Wilkins...You, I believe, could not follow in her footsteps...
Permalink Reply by Gregory Gorski on September 7, 2011 at 11:37am Name the last president that was ugly?
Permalink Reply by Nancy on September 7, 2011 at 11:56am
Permalink Reply by Janice Manz on September 7, 2011 at 1:04pm © 2013 Created by Judson Phillips.
