Breaking News: Defense of Marriage Act declared unconstitutional.


A three-judge panel for the 1st Circuit Court of Appeals in Boston has declared the Federal Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional.  DOMA, as the Defense of Marriage Act is sometimes referred to, declared that the Federal Government only recognized marriage as being between one man and one woman.


From USA Today:


A U.S. appeals court Thursday declared that the federal Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutionally denies federal benefits to married gay couples, a ruling all but certain to wind up before the U.S. Supreme Court.


The unanimous ruling said the 1996 law that defines marriage as a union between a man and a woman discriminates against gay couples because it doesn't give them the same rights and privileges as heterosexual couples.


The three-judge panel of the 1st U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals didn't rule on the law's other politically combustible provision, which said states without same-sex marriage cannot be forced to recognize gay unions performed in states where it's legal.


The panel also wasn't asked to address whether gay couples have a constitutional right to marry.


The court focused much of its ruling on issues of Federalism.  It noted that laws regarding marriage and domestic relations have always been the laws of the states and not the United States.


What is interesting are two very important points that were not addressed.  First is do gay couples have the constitutional right to marry and whether states will be forced to recognize homosexual marriage if the state has already passed a law expressly refusing to recognize those marriages.


A few predictions here:


First, the obvious one is this case will end up in front of the Supreme Court.   There is a high likelihood DOMA will be declared unconstitutional by the Supremes.  As a matter of politics, all four of the liberal justices will vote to declare it unconstitutional.  They will only need to peel off one of the conservative justices to get a majority.   The will probably peel off Anthony Kennedy.  Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in Lawrence v. Texas, which declared unconstitutional laws banning homosexual sex acts.  


Assuming DOMA is declared unconstitutional, then the two remaining issues, which are not covered by this litigation are whether there is a constitutional right for homosexuals to marry and whether another state must recognize a homosexual marriage, even if that state has done as North Carolina recently did, amending its constitution to define marriage between one man and one woman.


While it is hard to say on the right to marriage issue, I am surprised there has not been more litigation on the issue of recognition of gay marriage by other states.  Whether you like it or not, the issue is fairly clear-cut. 


The Constitution has something known as the “Full Faith and Credit” clause.  It states:



Full faith and credit shall be given in each state to the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every other state. And the Congress may by general laws prescribe the manner in which such acts, records, and proceedings shall be proved, and the effect thereof.


A marriage recognized by a state is a public act.    Currently married couples that move from one state to another do not have to be remarried in their new state.  As long as the marriage in a previous state was done in accordance with the laws of the previous state, it must be recognized. 


Whether we like it or not, because the liberal states have enacted homosexual marriage, sooner or later the Supreme Court is going to say those marriages must be recognized by all fifty states.


While there are many religious and moral arguments that can be made about this, the simple fact is for the last sixty years or so; the left has been attacking the basic family unit.  The end result of this has been the creation of poverty where none existed before.  It has been the creation of an under class, born and raised in poverty, unlikely to escape poverty and encouraged to engage in the same behaviors that landed their parents in poverty.


Given the left’s track record in this area, they should not even be allowed to offer an opinion much less pass laws as they are doing in some of the east coast liberal freak show states.

Views: 2620

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

It's all about advancing Marxism.  A free society depends on the people being moral.  The Marxists must degrade our society to overthrow capitalism and liberty.  They always try to provide cover by declaring that they are acting to protect the children or the environment or the homosexual or etc.  However, the goal is always the same, degrade society in order to create dependence on gov't.

Awesome! This is a big win for freedom and a big lose for government control!!

Trolling, are we?

Agreed, Henry.  Every society that has embraced homosexuality has declined and perished. 

Henry Knox, a big "LIKE" for your post! :-)

I totally agree,chip chip chipaway.

"Civil Union" is acceptable...........MARRIAGE is between one man and one woman......and cannot be used by homosexual freaks!

Why do you hate the Bible?

Matthew 25

25:1 "Then the kingdom of heaven shall be likened to ten virgins
who took their lamps and went out to meet the bridegroom.

25:2 Now five of them were wise, and five were foolish.

25:3 Those who were foolish took their lamps and took no oil with them,

25:4 but the wise took oil in their vessels with their lamps.

25:5 But while the bridegroom was delayed, they all slumbered and slept.

25:6 And at midnight a cry was heard:
'Behold, the bridegroom is coming; go out to meet him!'

The Old Testament also says:

The LORD then gave these further instructions to Moses: 'Tell the people of Israel to keep my Sabbath day, for the Sabbath is a sign of the covenant between me and you forever.  It helps you to remember that I am the LORD, who makes you holy.  Yes, keep the Sabbath day, for it is holy.  Anyone who desecrates it must die; anyone who works on that day will be cut off from the community.  Work six days only, but the seventh day must be a day of total rest.  I repeat: Because the LORD considers it a holy day, anyone who works on the Sabbath must be put to death.'  (Exodus 31:12-15 )

It has nothing to do with homosexuality. It is a parable about those that where ready and those that where not. Hence, if you are not saved when Jesus returns to judge, you are going to Hell.

It proves that multiple wives were okay in Jesus' time.

Here are a few passages for you to gnaw on.

1 Timothy 3:2
A bishop then must be blameless, the husband of one wife, vigilant, sober, of good behaviour, given to hospitality, apt to teach;

Titus 1:6
If any be blameless, the husband of one wife, having faithful children not accused of riot or unruly.

1 Timothy 3:12
Let the deacons be the husbands of one wife, ruling their children and their own houses well.

1 Corinthians 7:2
Nevertheless, to avoid fornication, let every man have his own wife, and let every woman have her own husband.


Tea Party Nation is a social network

© 2016   Created by Judson Phillips.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service