Someone once said there are only two things that have no known limits: The universe and human stupidity. And we are not certain about the universe.
American liberals hate it when we point out facts. Facts are such an inconvenient matter for liberals. Most sane people learn not only from their own mistakes but from the mistakes of others. Michael Savage says liberalism is a mental disorder. Perhaps that explains why liberals cannot deal with reality.
Reality is that liberalism is an abject failure. Socialism sucks and there is a reason for that. Socialism has never produced freedom, liberty or prosperity.
In Germany, we are getting another reminder of how socialism fails. Angela Merkel, the German Prime Minister is proposing a new tax. This is a tax on the youth of Germany.
Germany has a demographic problem. There are too many older people who are receiving generous social benefits and too few young people working to pay for those benefits.
Germany’s problems have two roots. First Germany, like so many European nations did not have policies that encouraged large families. In fact, their policies of high taxes discourage large families. Germany also has legal abortion. The end result, there are not enough Germans being born to replace the Germans getting old and dying off. This is not unique to Germany. In Britain, Italy, Greece and most of the other EU nations, the story is being repeated. In Russia, where in the days of the old Soviet Union abortion was the primary means of birth control, the Russian government is doing everything it can to pull Russia out of a population death spiral.
The second cause of Germany’s problems is its massive social welfare system. After the Second World War, Germany was mostly disarmed and for years after the war, it relied on American military hardware for its reconstituted Army, Air Force and Navy. It could afford to create lavish welfare programs.
Now Germany cannot afford these programs anymore.
So what does a socialist nation do when it can’t afford its welfare programs any longer? Instead of cutting the budget, it creates a new tax.
You do not have to be a rocket scientist to see where this is going to end up. One of the first laws of economics is, the more you tax something, the less you will have of it. Germany is taxing its future. A lot of the young Germans are not going to be thrilled that they are working so hard so the old Germans can have the easy life. They will vote with their feet and look for opportunities elsewhere.
Anyone, even a socialist should be able to see the handwriting on that wall.
What does this have to do with America?
The Democratic Party has sold its soul to the abortion industry and the radical feminazis. They want to subsidize abortions, sterilization and birth control. If you subsidize population decrease you will get population decrease.
The Democrats are also trying to create a lavish welfare state like Europe’s. Europe has failed. Its population is in a demographic nosedive and it is heading towards fiscal Armageddon.
If you see your neighbor start a fire that burns his house down, why on earth would you want to start a fire on your property?
That is what the Party of Treason wants to do. We have all seen what our future will be under their leadership. Only they are so blind they cannot accept the reality that their ideas suck and so do they.
By 2025 the world will be controlled by Muslims. I watched a video sometime back but can't find it. I think it was called "World Demographics". At this point in time the US isn't producing enough babys to maintain the population. This is sad. The population is being growing because of Muslims and I'll add Illegal Immigrants. This has to be stopped.
The European countries are worse off than we are.
ZERO has to be taken out of office, Along with a lot of other Communists and Muslims.
Don't worry about the growing Muslim demographics. Christ will be returning and ALL Muslims will bow at His knee and declare Him Almighty God. Some will accept Christ, the rest will end poorly.
Uploaded by lindaclements on Apr 27, 2009
This was originally posted by FriendOfMuslim. The Demographics exhibited in this video are alarming. There were 100,000 Muslims in America in 1970 There are 9,000,000 Muslims in American now. Our Grandchildren will be overrun by Muslims, Sharia Law, Abuse of Women, etc. In most continents on earth, it is already too late to turn the tide of the Muslim population explosion. Short of Divine Intervention, and Christian believers sharing the gospel, our planet will be overrun in no time.
<object style="height: 289px; width: 475px"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/_kKkY5EpVpY?version=3&feature=player_d... name="allowFullScreen" value="true"><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/_kKkY5EpVpY?version=3&feature=player_d..." type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="640" height="360"></object>
An excellent website for more information on the subject of the coming population wave of Muslims and immigrants, both legal and illegal, is Numbers USA.
Watch the "Gumball" video. It will shock you!
And Liberals along with their dependent constituency getting abortions on demand is a bad thing? I think not. It will only require a generation for them to disappear. Gone. Done. Our message to conservatives should be consistent with Biblical teachings. "Go forth and multiply". And, by the way, educate your kids in private schools or home schools to remove them from the socialist mindset.
Europe is crashing demographically, as is America!
The birth rate of indigenous citizens of all(?) European nations is decreasing and abortions are increasing while the third leg of the crashing stool is the rapid procreation Muslim communities, that are overrunning EU nations.
Hatching more kids simply means larger welfare checks - - - just like in America!
The libs want "choice" (aka kill the babies) contrary to God's Commandment, THOU SHALT NOT KILL. To replace those lost citizens they further want to impale the Constitution and let in "anchor babies" of those entering our country illegally. Let's forget the latter and make more of the former........in a free country where liberty abounds. May God have mercy upon us.
There is another reality that liberals cannot deal with. Not only do they not deal with it, they have somehow been joined by voices and powers that publicly claim to represent reasoned, intellectual conservativism. It is glaringly apparent that the media avoids the story of the Maricopa County cold case posse report based on nothing but a prejudged opinion that Obama is legally qualified to hold the office of President of the United States in spite of the lack of confirming evidence. It is daily more chilling to any thoughtful observer that there is such unanimity among news and political establishment pretense that the story is not there. Why should at least one voice in the national media or in the Legislative branch of government not publicly explore the story? Whether true or false, it is a powerful story and an honest media would investigate and report it. Honest elected representatives to congress would investigate it and act on it if action were warranted.
Sheriff Arpaio's investigation began on the assumption that Barack Obama was legally qualified. In accordance with good logical practice, he began with an attempt to prove a positive rather than a negative proposition. The evidence to support the proposition that Mr. Obama's documents entitle him to hold his office turned out not to be forthcoming. Indeed inspection of that prime proof of birthright citizenship, the birth document, proved it to be a forgery that never resided as a physical, paper document.
The search for further evidence of American citizenship led at some point to an examination of that other document that all American men have on file, Selective Service registration. That document also proved to be a transparent fake. Every American male has a birth certificate registered in his state records and for a nominal fee can obtain one or multiple copies of it complete with the required official embossed stamp. Likewise every American man has registered with the Selective Service system. All of us can prove that we have so registered. It turned out that Mr. Obama's record cannot substantiate that he legally registered with the Selective Service system since the date stamp on his registration card is not genuine.
To my knowledge, The Maricopa County cold case posse investigation has not released information concerning the questionable Social Security number being used by the President, but that it contains a number code indicating that it was issued for a Connecticut resident is abundantly suspicious since neither he nor any member of his family ever resided in that state.
To support the claims that both the birth document and the Selective service document are forged, the Maricopa County sheriff's posse submitted to our review a demonstration of the process they employed to determine the fact of document forgeries. That presentation is conclusive. Anyone with a trial copy of Adobe Illustrator can repeat the process demonstrated by that presentation. The results will confirm that there is probable cause to believe that the documents are forged. Sheriff Joe Arpaio and his team, in accordance with the highest standards of police investigation do not claim that Mr. Obama is guilty of forgery. They have discovered no evidence that indicates Mr. Obama to be the forger. That he stands to gain by the forgery is not a proof that he created the documents with his own hand or that he ordered others to do so.
Indeed the investigation has been conducted so carefully and with such attention to correct detail that a phrase that to my ear seemed to be merely grammatically incorrect police jargon clanged like an untuned bell. The report includes phrasing like this: "...there is probable cause that there was forgery ..."
Standard English usage would seem to indicate that "probable" is an adjective modifying the noun "cause". In this statement that noun would require the addition of the verb "to believe" in order to complete a clause containing a subject, verb and its object which in this case is a noun clause. I was wrong. The phrase "probable cause" is a legal term.
A visit to http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/probable+cause reveals this:
probable cause n. sufficient reason based upon known facts to believe a crime has been committed or that certain property is connected with a crime. Probable cause must exist for a law enforcement officer to make an arrest without a warrant, search without a warrant, or seize property in the belief the items were evidence of a crime. While some cases are easy (pistols and illicit drugs in plain sight, gunshots, a suspect running from a liquor store with a clerk screaming "help"), actions typical of drug dealers, burglars, prostitutes, thieves, or people with guilt "written across their faces," are more difficult to categorize. "Probable cause" is often subjective, but if the police officer's belief or even hunch was correct, finding stolen goods, the hidden weapon, or drugs may be claimed as self-fulfilling proof of probable cause. Technically, probable cause has to exist prior to arrest, search or seizure. (See: search, search and seizure, Bill of Rights)
Sheriff Joe's investigation was conducted and reported with meticulous attention to requirements of law, rules of evidence, and rigorous reasoning. There is probable cause to believe that the only documents available to demonstrate not only Mr. Obama's constitutional qualifications to be president, but that demonstrate his citizenship in the United States are forged documents.
Sheriff Arpaio's investigation passes every test of legality and reliability. It presents evidence of crime that, were it submitted to your Congressional Representative, should prompt him to launch a proceeding preliminary to impeachment of the President. It also presents a quick and easy pathway for Mr. Obama to disprove the implications that he lacks constitutional qualifications to hold his office. He can, as easily as you or I, provide access to the official record that contains his Hawaii birth document. He can disprove his collusion in the forgery of the birth document posted on the White House web site. He can order the Selective Service officials to provide access to his legitimate registration card. In other words, he can easily prove his legitimacy if such proof exists. Since he has so far not submitted such proof, we all have a duty to prompt our Congressional Representatives to uphold their oath of office.
That oath of office is this:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter: So help me God.
Mr. Obama has submitted forged documentation to support his claim to legitimacy in office. He has gone to great lengths to obfuscate the issue by responding with scorn rather than documentary evidence to support his legitimacy. There exists no legitimate documentary proof of his citizenship. Any elected official who has taken the oath of his office will have shown himself to have sworn falsely if he does not take measures to properly establish the truth concerning the question of whether a crime has been committed in Mr. Obama’s assumption of the Presidency. If, as seems probable, Mr. Obama has committed a crime, it will also be necessary to identify and deal with those who have supported him in the commission of that crime. Your representative will make himself one of the latter if he does not act in the manner his oath requires of him.
John Henry Botkin,
Outstanding post, Sir. However, as much as I would like love to see Odumbo impeached and convicted, the latter is an impossibility the way things currently stand. The House must bring charges of impeachment, which may well be possible. But the Senate would be the trier of fact and the result, no matter how damning the evidence, is a forgone conclusion as long as there is a Democrat majority with Harry Reid as Majority Leader.
If, God forbid, Odumbo should be re-elected but we can take over the Senate, then everything changes and a conviction would be a real possibility.
We all need to pray for the future of the USA!
My hypotheis has just been proven, Obama was not a Constitutional scholar, nor a constitutional professor. When he threatened the Supreme Court, I realized it.
Germany and Countries like Poland,embraced death, like a lover. It's part of the unadmitted to, self hate for their evil deeds in the early 40's.
This issue has been gnawing at me for some time. Pushing for smaller families will destroy a culture. When couples have less than 2 children, who mature and have children of their own, then your population naturally decreases as you aren't replacing yourself. May I offer that, generally, ungodliness breeds smaller families. Including, but not limited to, abortion, homosexuality, drugs, alcohol, cars/houses/stuff/entertainment/selfishness as priorities over starting/having/growing a family, and inconsistent Bible study/Prayer/Worship Attendance/Tithing/Service/Sharing faith.
I often wonder what the impact would be for a President to actively promote godliness and larger families and then for Congress and States to remove associated hindrances from "laws". Though I won't hold my breath on that, it would actually be better if we had another national spiritual awakening. IMO, "America" is slowly dying without it.